Re: [Bro-Dev] CBAN naming

>> I like "bro-pkg," though I wonder whether it could be even shortened to >> "bpkg" or "bkg." > > It could be, and bpkg is what I original suggest, but I thought you and > Justin liked bro-org better. The point here was that bro-pkg would align to bro-cut. Although I still like brow, I would

Re: [Bro-Dev] CBAN naming

> On Jun 2, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Matthias Vallentin wrote: > >> So with that said, I propose bro-pkg, but will leave this open for >> another day if there are strong opinions. > > I like "bro-pkg," though I wonder whether it could be even shortened to > "bpkg" or "bkg." It

Re: [Bro-Dev] CBAN naming

> So with that said, I propose bro-pkg, but will leave this open for > another day if there are strong opinions. I like "bro-pkg," though I wonder whether it could be even shortened to "bpkg" or "bkg." This would be the name for the command line client. How would we call the whole thing? The Bro

Re: [Bro-Dev] CBAN naming

> On Jun 2, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Siwek, Jon wrote: > >> >> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:30 PM, Slagell, Adam J wrote: >> >> These are variants of #1, which I now substitute with bro-pkg > > Related to “pkg” or “package” naming: if that terminology gets used,

Re: [Bro-Dev] CBAN naming

> On Jun 2, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Siwek, Jon wrote: > > Related to “pkg” or “package” naming: if that terminology gets used, what > would be done about the classic/existing usage of the term “package” within > Bro? > > “Package” is currently used to refer to any collection

Re: [Bro-Dev] CBAN naming

> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:30 PM, Slagell, Adam J wrote: > > These are variants of #1, which I now substitute with bro-pkg Related to “pkg” or “package” naming: if that terminology gets used, what would be done about the classic/existing usage of the term “package” within