I already talked to Matthias but for the record, this looks good to
me.
One more question:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 15:24 -0700, you wrote:
(4) bloomfilter_merge(bf1: opaque of bloomfilter, bf2: opaque of
bloomfilter) : bool
Is this merging bf2 into bf1? Would it make sense to return a new
So it sounds like having the merge function returning bool was an accident?
Exactly, well-spotted!
Matthias
___
bro-dev mailing list
bro-dev@bro.org
http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
I'm the process of devising Bro's new Bloom filter interface and would
like to have your feedback on the BiFs. This is what I came up with so
far:
(1) bloomfilter_init(fp: double, capacity: count, max: count): opaque
of bloomfilter
(2) bloomfilter_add(bf: opaque of bloomfilter, x: any)
(3)
