> On Sep 19, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Robin Sommer wrote:
>
> @Jon: Do you think this would be doable that way?
Yeah, looks viable.
> - I’m not quite sure if the bundle should contain just the packages
> themselves or further bro-pkg state as well, such as which packages
> are currently loaded. Rig
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Azoff, Justin S wrote:
>
> Sounds great.. What you are describing is basically source and binary
> packages.
In concept, I like the idea of simply extending the “install” command to be
able to install from a source or binary packages, but how would the package
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:11 +, you wrote:
> Sounds great.. What you are describing is basically source and binary
> packages.
Not sure "binary package" is the right term, at least for the first
part of your description (where nothing gets built). The difference
seems more to be having one
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 14:35 +, you wrote:
> Yeah, I think that’s generally how it would be also. Though, maybe
> since the default behavior of the “install” command is to
> automatically do a subsequent “load” it makes sense to automatically
> do loads after “unbundle” as well.
What woul