On 09:16 Mon 31 Oct , Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> bsd-port seems to be still in b147 whereas macosx-port is allready b215.
>
> Is it planned to put it in sync ?
>
OpenJDK7 only goes up to b147:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/
The numerous jdk7ux trees seem to continue but with
On 20:08 Tue 18 Oct , Henri Gomez wrote:
> > I suggest you ask a lawyer.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion but individuals like me don't have lawyers
> available so easily, especially those involved in licences issues :)
>
> Usually there is people very aware of licences problematics in OSS
> com
On 26 October 2010 13:29, John Yeary wrote:
> There should be no issues around licensing. I have a conference call on
> Friday to see about getting more binaries built by Oracle. Until there is
> some word, it would still be prudent for the community to post ones like you
> noted for less popular
On 23 November 2009 04:57, Michael Franz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a new fclone of the bsd repo today. When running the build I get the
> following error:
> javax.net.ssl.SSLException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected error:
> java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors
On 23 February 2010 09:31, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:15 -0800, Michael Allman wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>
>> > Michael Allman wrote:
>> >> Does the BSD jdk port accept code contributions from non-copyright
>> >> holders?
>> >
>> > It follows the sam
On 10 February 2010 10:50, Andrei Dmitriev wrote:
> You see it on MacOS only? We tried linux and it's ok.
>
No I've seen it on using local GNU/Linux builds of IcedTea to
bootstrap. Will recheck when I get a chance.
> The workaround works - thanks!
No problem :-)
>
On 8 February 2010 11:06, Andrei Dmitriev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know the future of 6856630? It's in the log but I still see
> following error while building full bsd-repo on MacOSX.
> Didn't find anything mentioning I need to modify my build scripts. Any
> ideas?
>
> If asking build-dev is
2009/12/10 Ray Kiddy :
>
> I just wanted to update build people on this issue. There are pages on the
> wiki for building on Mac OS X 10.5.8 and on Snow Leopard. See the "Building
> from source" section of http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJDK/BSDPort. I have
> updated http://wikis.sun.com/display/O
>
> Also, is there an easy way to force the bootstrap jdk to be compiled as Java
> 5? It seem to compile some of the classes as Java 7 and some based on
> BOOT_SOURCE_LANGUAGE_VERSION BOOT_TARGET_CLASS_VERSION. I had to define
> TARGET_CLASS_VERSION, SOURCE_LANGUAGE_VERSION and
> SOURCE_CLASS_VER
2009/11/24 Martin Buchholz :
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 15:39, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> What version of ant are you using?
>
> I think I'm using 1.7.0
>
$ ant -version
Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on May 6 2009
Boot JDK is OpenJDK6 b17.
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
2009/11/23 Michael Franz :
> Hi,
>
> I did a new fclone of the bsd repo today. When running the build I get the
> following error:
> javax.net.ssl.SSLException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected error:
> java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors parameter
> must be no
asspath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
> ********
> did overlays
> start java build
>
> patches/boot/icedtea.patch
>
> openjdk-boot/corba/make/common/Defs.gmk
>
Not sure about why we do this, need to look into it.
> Eric
>
> On Mon,
2009/11/17 Kurt Miller :
> Hi Greg,
>
> Greg Lewis wrote:
>> G'day all,
>>
>> I just committed a few patches for Zero support on BSD which should be
>> fairly safe. I've got a couple more that I'd like to get some review
>> on before committing. So far I've tested them on FreeBSD 7.x/i386 (single
2009/11/17 Kurt Miller :
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> I'm currently trying to build the BSD tree on linux-amd64 and am confused by:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port/jdk/diff/4fef42eb432c/make/common/internal/BinaryPlugs.gmk
>
2009/11/16 Eric Richardson :
> Andrew,
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Andrew John Hughes
> wrote:
>>
>> 2009/11/15 Michael Franz :
>> > Eric,
>> >
>> > I have encountered this issue before. I am not sure what I did to fix
>> > it
2009/11/15 Michael Franz :
> Eric,
>
> I have encountered this issue before. I am not sure what I did to fix it.
> I think I used ecj instead of the Apple javac. Check the javac perl script
> that IcedTea has. The other option is to apply this patch in the required
> build files.
>
> http://cr.o
2009/11/10 Christos Zoulas :
> On Nov 9, 7:59pm, gle...@eyesbeyond.com (Greg Lewis) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: OpenJDK 6 Build 17
>
> | For me, the latter is the key question. How do we move forward with
> | getting BSD support (ultimately) into the current development tree so
> | we have less heav
2009/11/10 Gary Benson :
> Greg Lewis wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 02:12:17AM +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> > 2009/11/10 Kurt Miller :
>> > > It would be fantastic if Sun would host a mercurial repository
>> > > for OpenJDK6 (i.e. bsd-port6 o
2009/11/10 Greg Lewis :
> G'day Andrew,
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 02:12:17AM +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> 2009/11/10 Kurt Miller :
>> > It would be fantastic if Sun would host a mercurial repository
>> > for OpenJDK6 (i.e. bsd-port6 or the like). Is
2009/11/10 Kurt Miller :
>
> It would be fantastic if Sun would host a mercurial repository
> for OpenJDK6 (i.e. bsd-port6 or the like). Is there a chance that
> Sun could set that up for us? The lack of a central repository is
> one of the reasons I haven't worked on OpenBSD support for OpenJDK.
>
2009/10/19 Greg Lewis :
> G'day John,
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 01:06:36PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:06:01PM -0700, John Rose wrote:
>> > With the current bsd-port plus unrelated MLVM patches I got a clean
>> > Snow Leopard build. It passed the MLVM regression tests.
2009/9/12 Michael Franz :
> vsrikarunyan,
>
> Did this solve your problem? It got me past the original error, but I am
> not getting :
> hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/arguments.cpp: In static member function
> 'static void Arguments::set_aggressive_opts_flags()':
> hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/argu
2009/8/25 Andrew John Hughes :
> 2009/8/25 Christian Thalinger :
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> True, but I don't see the advantage in destroying the history just to
>>> make the changes into a more convenient set of changesets.
>>
>> Well, at leas
2009/8/25 Christian Thalinger :
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> True, but I don't see the advantage in destroying the history just to
>> make the changes into a more convenient set of changesets.
>
> Well, at least when the bsd-port is commited back to jdk7, the history
2009/8/24 Christian Thalinger :
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> Btw. what do you think of using Mercurials rebase extension[1]? I think
>>> it would be more straight forward as the base repository would be
>>> exactly the same (no changesets in between) and th
2009/8/24 Christian Thalinger :
> Greg Lewis wrote:
>> G'day Christian,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:05:58PM +0200, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>> Hi (mostly Greg)!
>>>
>>> I wanted to ask at what intervals a merge with upstream is done? I
>>> guess it's just a matter of spare time and actuall
2009/8/21 Christian Thalinger :
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Unless bsd-port is handled differently to the other OpenJDK forests,
>> your existing OpenJDK account should just work. I've used mine across
>> about 6-7 forests now.
>
&g
2009/8/21 Christian Thalinger :
> Hi (mostly Greg)!
>
> I wanted to ask at what intervals a merge with upstream is done? I
> guess it's just a matter of spare time and actually doing it. Maybe I
> could help with that task, but then I'd need commit rights.
>
> Furthermore it would be nice to inte
2009/6/2 Kurt Miller :
> Nabil wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've seen that openjdk6 it's available for Ubuntu PowerPC.
>> It's possible to build it in Leopard (PPC machine)?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Not currently. If/When Zero (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/zero/)
> is merged into OpenJDK 7 ppc su
29 matches
Mail list logo
