On 7/28/11 9:41 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Another question about JDK7/8, bsd-port (and so macosx-port).
>>> What about support of processors arch like PPC and ARM via Zero project ?
>>> Could we expect JDK7 (or may be JDK8) to have Zero Project in the mainline ?
>>
>> That's already the case. Zer
28, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
>> If I understand correctly, merging BSDPort into jdk mainline means that the
>> BSD-specific codes are not only in the bsd-port repo, but also inside the
>> master jdk8 repo and thus will be synced to every other team repo (awt,
&g
wrote:
> If I understand correctly, merging BSDPort into jdk mainline means that the
> BSD-specific codes are not only in the bsd-port repo, but also inside the
> master jdk8 repo and thus will be synced to every other team repo (awt,
> tl,...). The direct result is that every openjd
If I understand correctly, merging BSDPort into jdk mainline means that
the BSD-specific codes are not only in the bsd-port repo, but also
inside the master jdk8 repo and thus will be synced to every other team
repo (awt, tl,...). The direct result is that every openjdk contributor,
no matter
On Jul 28, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> It is not the goal of anyone at Apple to support these architectures. I am
>> not in a position to say if anyone at Oracle is interested in doing the work
>> for ancient PPC Macs. If someone in the community would like to put in the
>> effort,
> It is not the goal of anyone at Apple to support these architectures. I am
> not in a position to say if anyone at Oracle is interested in doing the work
> for ancient PPC Macs. If someone in the community would like to put in the
> effort, I would suggest they speak up now.
I understand that
On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> He means exactly what he said. JDK8 is an official product produced by
>>> Oracle, and the BSD-port code will be merged into that product. So that Mac
>>> OS X can become an officially supported platform.
>>
>> ok thanks, I wasn't aware that
>> Another question about JDK7/8, bsd-port (and so macosx-port).
>> What about support of processors arch like PPC and ARM via Zero project ?
>> Could we expect JDK7 (or may be JDK8) to have Zero Project in the mainline ?
>
> That's already the case. Zero was merged in some time ago.
Sorry but I'
>> He means exactly what he said. JDK8 is an official product produced by
>> Oracle, and the BSD-port code will be merged into that product. So that Mac
>> OS X can become an officially supported platform.
>
> ok thanks, I wasn't aware that BSD code into JDK7 wasn't already in such case.
Anothe
> He means exactly what he said. JDK8 is an official product produced by
> Oracle, and the BSD-port code will be merged into that product. So that Mac
> OS X can become an officially supported platform.
ok thanks, I wasn't aware that BSD code into JDK7 wasn't already in such case.
He means exactly what he said. JDK8 is an official product produced by Oracle,
and the BSD-port code will be merged into that product. So that Mac OS X can
become an officially supported platform.
Gary.
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> As the first of many steps to integrate
> As the first of many steps to integrate the Mac OS X Port into mainline jdk8,
> we need to merge the BSDPort code (on which the Mac OS X Port is based) into
> the jdk8 mainline. I've started this discussion as it pertains to HotSpot
> on the hotspot-dev mailing list:
>
> http://mail.openjdk.
As the first of many steps to integrate the Mac OS X Port into mainline jdk8,
we need to merge the BSDPort code (on which the Mac OS X Port is based) into
the jdk8 mainline. I've started this discussion as it pertains to HotSpot on
the hotspot-dev mailing list:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pi
13 matches
Mail list logo
