Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
08.09.2011, 05:26, "Kurt Miller": >>  3) Does anybody have OpenJDK image for Mac/PPC newer than [5]? In [5] Zero >> is failng too much: it cannot run Java 5 application which runs fine of >> Apple JVM, and it cannot be used as bootstrap VM. >> >>  [5] >> http://landonf.bikemonkey.org/static/s

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread John Yeary
Wow! A build that works on PPC. I will try it out when I get home tonight. Are there any specific steps that you had to use to get it to compile? Could you update the directions on the build page http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJDK/Darwin9Build This is all very exciting. John 2011/9/8 Konstanti

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Kurt Miller
On 9/8/11 4:08 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 08.09.2011, 05:26, "Kurt Miller": > >>> 3) Does anybody have OpenJDK image for Mac/PPC newer than [5]? In [5] >>> Zero is failng too much: it cannot run Java 5 application which runs fine >>> of Apple JVM, and it cannot be used as bootstrap VM. >

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Kurt, It could be nice for PPC users to get it packaged Sad I don't have OSX PPC box available to make package built on it via a Jenkins slave ;( 2011/9/8 Kurt Miller : > On 9/8/11 4:08 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> >> 08.09.2011, 05:26, "Kurt Miller": >>   3) Does anybody have OpenJDK i

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Kurt Miller
Hi Henri, On Thursday 08 September 2011 08:53:42 am Henri Gomez wrote: > Kurt, > > It could be nice for PPC users to get it packaged > > Sad I don't have OSX PPC box available to make package built on it via > a Jenkins slave ;( Once it is working well again, hopefully someone from the comunity

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Mike Swingler
On Sep 8, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Kurt Miller wrote: > Hi Henri, > > On Thursday 08 September 2011 08:53:42 am Henri Gomez wrote: >> Kurt, >> >> It could be nice for PPC users to get it packaged >> >> Sad I don't have OSX PPC box available to make package built on it via >> a Jenkins slave ;( > > On

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Henri Gomez
> Once it is working well again, hopefully someone from the comunity will > step up and do that work or donate you a PPC box for your build farm. Build farm ? Ouch I'm far from this, but I'll be happy to help for PPC builds.

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Henri Gomez
> An Intel Leopard box should be able to compile a universal binary for both > PPC and Intel, but would require explicitly passing -arch flags. No more Leo here, Snow and Lion only ;( > The J2SE 5.0 builds on Leopard for ppc, i386, and x86_64 were always made > using an Intel builder. Interest

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Kurt Miller
On Thursday 08 September 2011 11:42:34 am Mike Swingler wrote: > On Sep 8, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Kurt Miller wrote: > > > Hi Henri, > > > > On Thursday 08 September 2011 08:53:42 am Henri Gomez wrote: > >> Kurt, > >> > >> It could be nice for PPC users to get it packaged > >> > >> Sad I don't have

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Mike Swingler
On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Kurt Miller wrote: > On Thursday 08 September 2011 11:42:34 am Mike Swingler wrote: > >> On Sep 8, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Kurt Miller wrote: >> >>> Hi Henri, >>> >>> On Thursday 08 September 2011 08:53:42 am Henri Gomez wrote: Kurt, It could be nice for PP

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Kurt Miller
On Thursday 08 September 2011 12:26:33 pm Mike Swingler wrote: > On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Kurt Miller wrote: > > > On Thursday 08 September 2011 11:42:34 am Mike Swingler wrote: > > > >> On Sep 8, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Kurt Miller wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Henri, > >>> > >>> On Thursday 08 September

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Mike Swingler
On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: >> An Intel Leopard box should be able to compile a universal binary for both >> PPC and Intel, but would require explicitly passing -arch flags. > > No more Leo here, Snow and Lion only ;( > >> The J2SE 5.0 builds on Leopard for ppc, i386, and x86

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Henri Gomez
> I'm not sure what you mean? What is an "arch detector"? We do have the > macosx-port setup to do Intel-Universal builds, but I don't think any of that > logic trickled back to bsd-port. Many uname in makefile settings some envvars and activating various builds options

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
08.09.2011, 20:15, "Kurt Miller": >>  An Intel Leopard box should be able to compile a universal binary for both >> PPC and Intel, but would require explicitly passing -arch flags. >> >>  The J2SE 5.0 builds on Leopard for ppc, i386, and x86_64 were always made >> using an Intel builder. > > Th

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
08.09.2011, 05:26, "Kurt Miller": > I have some debug builds from February here: > > http://www.intricatesoftware.com/OpenJDK/macppc/ > I get java.awt.HeadlessException when trying to launch any GUI software. Try to launch e.g demo/jfc/FileChooserDemo/FileChooserDemo.jar from package. -- Rega

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Kurt Miller
Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/a3142bdb6707 > [4] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/d17bd0b18663 > Konstantin, With these fixes I can build bsd-port on ppc again too. I am currently testing the build by using it to

mercurial version?

2011-09-08 Thread Christos Zoulas
Does anyone know what version of mercurial the bsd-port repository is running? I am asking because last time I committed something (roughly 2 years ago), the repository got corrupted because it could not handle 64 bit time_t' from newer mercurial. Thanks, christos

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
08.09.2011, 23:01, "Kurt Miller": > As far as I can tell it is not possible for mercurial to pull over > individual change sets. Actually, it's possible via hg-git and git cherry-pick, but it may be not acceptable for you ;) However, I guess that only those 2 changes were not enough to make Ze

hg: bsd-port/bsd-port/hotspot: 3 new changesets

2011-09-08 Thread christos
Changeset: 45d640b4ff1b Author:Christos Zoulas Date: 2011-09-08 20:02 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port/hotspot/rev/45d640b4ff1b Protect __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS from re-definition. It is best not to define this here, but in jvm_bsd.h because we want it defined be

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Kurt Miller
On 9/8/11 1:28 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 08.09.2011, 05:26, "Kurt Miller": >> I have some debug builds from February here: >> >> http://www.intricatesoftware.com/OpenJDK/macppc/ >> > I get java.awt.HeadlessException when trying to launch any GUI software. > > Try to launch e.g demo/jfc/FileCh

hg: bsd-port/bsd-port/hotspot: 3 new changesets

2011-09-08 Thread kurt
Changeset: d99689d906ec Author:kurt Date: 2011-09-08 23:47 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port/hotspot/rev/d99689d906ec Summary: Handle SIGBUS the same as SIGSEGV on bsd w/zero. Needed for FreeBSD at least. ! src/os_cpu/bsd_zero/vm/os_bsd_zero.cpp Changeset: 68

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Kurt Miller
On 9/8/11 1:28 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 08.09.2011, 05:26, "Kurt Miller": >> I have some debug builds from February here: >> >> http://www.intricatesoftware.com/OpenJDK/macppc/ >> > I get java.awt.HeadlessException when trying to launch any GUI software. > > Try to launch e.g demo/jfc/File

Re: OpenJDK Zero PPC Build on OS X Leopard

2011-09-08 Thread Kurt Miller
On 9/8/11 3:20 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > However, I guess that only those 2 changes were not enough to make Zero > *working* (my java binary failed to initialize) I pushed up the changes + one more that has been in my zero tree for a while. zero is working again for me. I have been able to s