Hi Jim,
> Jim writes:
>> Do you think AUCTeX should do smart action to avoid "--nonstopmode" when
>> "--synctex" is requested by the user, so that
>> (setq ConTeXt-texexec-option-nonstop "")
>> isn't necessary on the user side? It isn't difficult to have
>> "--nonstopmode" only when `TeX-sou
Hi Ikuma,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 17:44 (+0900), Ikumi Keita wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>> Jim writes:
>>> It is easy to remove "--texutil", but I'd like to ask whether it is safe
>>> for older (before 2023) TeX distribution to do so. What was this option
>>> "--texutil" for? Unfortunately, "context
Hi Jim,
> Jim writes:
>> It is easy to remove "--texutil", but I'd like to ask whether it is safe
>> for older (before 2023) TeX distribution to do so. What was this option
>> "--texutil" for? Unfortunately, "context --help" of TeX Live 2024
>> doesn't give me useful information.
> I am a re
Hi Ikumi,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 15:31 (+0900), Ikumi Keita wrote:
> Thank you for your report. None of the AUCTeX maintainer uses ConTeXt, so
> inputs from ConTeXt user are valuable.
Glad you think so!
>> Jim writes:
>> (1) TeX-command-list contains the following
>> ("ConTeXt" "%(cn
Hi Jim,
Thank you for your report. None of the AUCTeX maintainer uses ConTeXt,
so inputs from ConTeXt user are valuable.
> Jim writes:
> (1) TeX-command-list contains the following
> ("ConTeXt" "%(cntxcom) --once --texutil %(extraopts) %(execopts)%t"
> and --texutil isn't in texlive
Emacs : GNU Emacs 27.2 (build 1, x86_64-slackware-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version
3.24.27) of 2021-03-25
Package: 14.0.3.2024-03-17
Some of the ConTeXt-specific features are a bit outdated, and, as of
recently, arguably broken.
(1) TeX-command-list contains the following
("ConTeXt" "%(cntxcom) --on
