On 04/11/2018 10:57 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Yep, that's an incompatibility. The `c.c' thing in the original report is
> just a red herring, though.
>
> Chet
>
If you are aiming for compatibility with zsh, the fact that `echo **' recurses
is also a bug.
On 4/11/18 11:51 AM, Murukesh Mohanan wrote:
> Yep, sorry about that, c.c is selected:
>
> $ bash -c '(shopt -s globstar; d=$(mktemp -d); cd "$d"; mkdir a; ln -s a b;
> touch a/a.c c.c; echo **/*.c; cd ..; rm -r "$d")'
> a/a.c b/a.c c.c
>
> Is there a chance of having ** not select symlinks to
Yep, sorry about that, c.c is selected:
$ bash -c '(shopt -s globstar; d=$(mktemp -d); cd "$d"; mkdir a; ln -s a b;
touch a/a.c c.c; echo **/*.c; cd ..; rm -r "$d")'
a/a.c b/a.c c.c
Is there a chance of having ** not select symlinks to directories, so that
b/c.c doesn't show up in the output?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:16:19PM +0300, Ilkka Virta wrote:
> So, given
>
> .
> |-- dir
> | +-- link -> ../otherdir
> +-- otherdir
> +-- subdir
> +-- foo
>
> (that is: mkdir -p dir otherdir/subdir; ln -s ../otherdir dir/link; touch
> otherdir/subdir/foo )
>
> dir/**/foo does not
On 11.4. 17:57, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 4/11/18 10:32 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:21:03AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 4/11/18 12:21 AM, Murukesh Mohanan wrote:
This has come up in the past, and was somewhat resolved (<
On 4/11/18 10:32 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:21:03AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 4/11/18 12:21 AM, Murukesh Mohanan wrote:
>>> This has come up in the past, and was somewhat resolved (<
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-03/msg00097.html>), but
>>>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:21:03AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 4/11/18 12:21 AM, Murukesh Mohanan wrote:
> > This has come up in the past, and was somewhat resolved (<
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-03/msg00097.html>), but
> > bash's behaviour is still a but surprising IMHO.
On 4/11/18 12:21 AM, Murukesh Mohanan wrote:
> This has come up in the past, and was somewhat resolved (<
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-03/msg00097.html>), but
> bash's behaviour is still a but surprising IMHO. While globstar doesn't
> descend further into symlinks, symlinked
