[Bug binutils/11983] libbfd reuses pointer passed to bfd_openr

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 10:54 --- Hi Carlo, The correct thing to do is to take a copy of the filename, rather than relying upon the original still being valid. So, please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for

[Bug binutils/11973] mn10300 assembler produce incorrect calls address for far calls (32bit) when command contain nonzero stack and/or saving registers

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 11:07 --- Subject: Bug 11973 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2010-09-08 11:07:39 Modified files: gas: ChangeLog gas/config :

[Bug gas/11972] Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 14:27 --- Created an attachment (id=4970) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4970action=view) Fix ARM parsing of bignums -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11972 --- You are

[Bug binutils/11991] ar --plugin does not use plugin

2010-09-08 Thread andi-bz at firstfloor dot org
--- Additional Comments From andi-bz at firstfloor dot org 2010-09-08 14:25 --- Never mind. I resolved it with Rafael privately. The trick is to use GNUTARGET=plugin, but that isn't documented anywhere (should be probably) I think there are still some issues with the plugin, but I'll

[Bug gas/11972] Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails

2010-09-08 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- Additional Comments From rmansfield at qnx dot com 2010-09-08 15:31 --- Thanks! I no longer get the error when assembling but the value has changed. With 2.19.1: 0: f2c30e30vmov.i64d16, #0x And with the patch applied: 0: f3c70e30

[Bug gas/11972] Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 16:37 --- Hi Ryan, I may be confused here, but -4294967296 is the same as -(0x1), right ? So wouldn't that mean that the 2.19.1 assembler was wrong and that the current assembler, with the patch applied, is

[Bug binutils/11938] Support for linking with Solaris libraries is only enabled on SPARC!

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 16:49 --- Hi Andrew, I am not quite sure what you have in mind here, so please could you generate a patch. Please keep in mind that tools like readelf ought to be able to process Solaris libraries even if they were

[Bug gas/11972] Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails

2010-09-08 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- Additional Comments From rmansfield at qnx dot com 2010-09-08 16:59 --- Yes, you're right. Thanks again for the fixing this bug. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11972 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or

[Bug ld/11931] Segfault in ld (elf_link_output_extsym) when defining symbols with a constraint on a non-existent section

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 17:02 --- Created an attachment (id=4971) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4971action=view) Skip abort for linker created symbols. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11931 ---

[Bug binutils/11973] mn10300 assembler produce incorrect calls address for far calls (32bit) when command contain nonzero stack and/or saving registers

2010-09-08 Thread DaLiV at apollo dot lv
--- Additional Comments From DaLiV at apollo dot lv 2010-09-08 19:33 --- example of code with assembling will be ok ? look at 11 and 17 - that is not patched , address ofset field passed to linker equal to registers and stack offset values part (=incorrect). $ mn10300-as.exe 40.asm -al

[Bug gold/11994] New: Gold failed to build

2010-09-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
This patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-09/msg00014.html breaks gold on Fedora 13/x86-64: cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors /export/gnu/import/git/binutils/gold/script-sections.cc: In member function ‘void gold::Script_sections::add_memory_region(const char*, size_t, unsigned

[Bug gold/11994] Gold failed to build

2010-09-08 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2010-09-08 23:55 --- Already fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/11931] Segfault in ld (elf_link_output_extsym) when defining symbols with a constraint on a non-existent section

2010-09-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-09 02:06 --- Nick, I think you're just papering over the real problem here. Our handling of assignments inside ONLY_IF... sections is quite broken. To see more problems, try the link with a map file. :-( The trouble is