https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22443
--- Comment #9 from Mingi Cho ---
Created attachment 10619
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10619&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Nick,
I have tested with your patch and added checking for null pointers because the
symbo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22443
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10617|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22443
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10609|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22443
--- Comment #6 from Mingi Cho ---
Created attachment 10616
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10616&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Nick,
I tested with the patch which you suggested. But in my case the problem still
occurs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22443
--- Comment #5 from Mingi Cho ---
Created attachment 10615
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10615&action=edit
minimized testcase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22450
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> Hi H.J.
>
> > It works for me. Can you extract the testcase from
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-11/msg00304.html
> >
> > We need to verify that th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22450
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi H.J.
> It works for me. Can you extract the testcase from
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-11/msg00304.html
>
> We need to verify that the bogus note is removed from output
> and there is n
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22419
--- Comment #2 from Michael ---
Nick,
I wonder if LD ought to be able to support binary output at all?
I feel that it should, since growth of embedded and IoT type devices is huge
and binary output is needed for most firmware generation. Cr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22450
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> Created attachment 10611 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi H.J.
>
> What do you think of this patch ?
>
> I was wondering if we should complain if we do not fi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22450
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22451
Bug ID: 22451
Summary: strip no longer works on older object files
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22449
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22449
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3cfd3dd0956fe854a07795de12c1302ecabbd819
commit 3cfd3dd0956fe854a07795de12c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22443
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10608|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22443
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 10608
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10608&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Guys,
In which case, please can someone try out this patch and let me know if it
fixes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22450
Bug ID: 22450
Summary: ld: Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22443
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
17 matches
Mail list logo
