https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33454
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33450
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 33449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33449
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33452
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 33452 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 33450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 33454 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33455
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16357
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16357&action=edit
A patch
Try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 33453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33456
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 33456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16356
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16356&action=edit
A patch
Try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33458
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33451
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 33458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33451
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16355
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16355&action=edit
A patch
Try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org, liuzhensong at loongson dot cn
Target Milestone
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 tls-5]$ cat x.c
__attribute__ ((tls_model ("local-exec"))) __thread int i;
int *
foo (void)
{
return &
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Joseph Myers from comment #10)
> No, just resolve the relocations by writing 0 in the relocated bits in the
> case of an undefined weak symbol.
>
Someone needs to fix the m68k linker and verify t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Joseph Myers from comment #8)
> Created attachment 16340 [details]
> TLS ABI
>
> The ABI (attached) expects -mxtls to be used for LD and LE TLS access with a
> TLS area too large for 16-bit offsets
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #4)
> > > It's probably time to remove coldfire support from glibc. There's at le
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #4)
> It's probably time to remove coldfire support from glibc. There's at least
> one other GCC issue that comes and goes randomly, causing glibc build
> failures.
>
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fweimer at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|m68k|m68k-coldfire
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #1 from H
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: m68k
The range of R_68K_TLS_LE16 is very limited
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33427
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16339
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16339&action=edit
A patch
This allows me to build glibc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Undefined hidden TLS symbol |Undefined TLS symbol is
|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16338
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16338&action=edit
A patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org, shorne at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: or1k
[hjl@gnu-zen4-1 gas]$ cat /tmp/y.s
.text
l.movhi r27
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33408
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.46
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33409
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33409
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33389
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.46
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33374
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16319|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33397
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
onent: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Makefile.am has
GENSCRIPTS = $(SHELL) $(srcdir)/genscripts.sh "${srcdir}" "${libdir}"
"${prefix}" "${exec_prefix}" @host@ @targ
erity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: Solaris x86
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ touch x.c
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ gcc -c x.c
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ ./ld-n
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.46
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33349
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #2)
> > --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
> > Created attachment 16307 [details]
> > --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16307&action=edit
> > A patch
> >
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp has
set got [remote_exec host "tail -n +4 tmpdir/objdump.out" "" "/dev/null"
"tmp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33374
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16319
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16319&action=edit
A patch
Here is a patch to use generic x86 targets for Solaris.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
If a shared library has
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 solaris]$ readelf -D -sW x.so | grep _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_
3: 02c0 0 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu ---
(In r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33374
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33374
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
One option is to drop Solaris emulation and enable Solaris features via
command-line options. When binutils is configured for Solaris targets,
these features are enabled by default. This will require some code
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27666
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33374
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33349
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16307|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Only the GNU linker properly sets sh_entsize on PLT and GOT sections:
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 readelf-2]$ ld.gold -o gold.so -shared foo.o
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 readelf-2]$ readelf -SW gold.so | grep -E "plt|got"
[ 5] .rela.
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i386
elf_i386_finish_dynamic_sections has
/* UnixWare sets the entsize of .plt to 4, although that doesn't
really seem like the right
ormal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 tmp]$ readelf --got /opt/google/chrome/chrome
Floating point exception (core dumped)
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 tmp]$ readel
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33349
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33328
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33358
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.46
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33351
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33344
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33328
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86
elf_x86_64_get_synthetic_symtab has
/* Match lazy PLT first. Need to check the first two
instructions. */
if ((memcmp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33351
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.46
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
A pat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33344
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Rin Okuyama from comment #0)
> > You can see the size of segment is not changed at all. This results in
> > regression of stripped-binary sizes for NetBSD.
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33344
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33287
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> richi would like to make GCC configure fatal by default unless users have
> safe glibc or explicitly ask for =gnu (see
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/
> CAFi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33328
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28387
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hjl.tools at gmail dot com |unassigned at
sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33314
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #12)
> Looks like libpython.3.15.so from the attachment in comment 1 is mislinked.
>
> readelf -rR.got 33314/libpython3.15.so.1.0
>
> we have
>
> 00463b48 000
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ cat x.s
.data
.p2align 3
.globl data
data:
.dc.a __ehdr_start + 2
.dc.a __ehdr_start +
: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: jbeulich at suse dot com
Target Milestone: ---
hjl@gnu-cfl-3 tmp]$ cat y.s
.section .foo, "aw", %progbits,unique,0
.zero 6
.section .foo,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33314
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28387
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.46
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
||2025-08-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16281
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16281&action=edit
A p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28387
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.46 (HEAD)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #13)
> Btw., it's a bit confusing the there are two instances of the No PLT
> tests in ld.sum for two different tests. May that's something to fix in
> a followup?
Did y
sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Target Milestone|--- |2.46
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
Please try:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/binutils/list/?series=51114
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10)
>
> check:
> subq$8, %rsp
> call*get_func@GOTPCREL(%rip)
> - cmpq%rax, func_p(%rip)
^^^ This is from Linux whi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #5)
> > --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
> > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #3)
> >> Recently, the workaround (hack?) stopped working: the tests FAIL to run
> >> wit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #3)
> Recently, the workaround (hack?) stopped working: the tests FAIL to run with
>
> Running: tmpdir/no-plt-1f > tmpdir/no-plt-1f.out
> ld.so.1: no-plt-1f: fatal: relocat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #7)
> > --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
> >> It is without -z nocopyreloc as originally reported, but then the test
> >> aborts. Until recently, the -z nocopyreloc workaro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33300
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
stdio.c has
#undef stdin
#undef stdout
#undef stderr
FILE *stdin = (FILE *) &_IO_2_1_stdin_;
FILE *stdout = (FILE *) &_IO_2_1_stdout_;
FILE *stderr = (FILE *) &_IO_2_1_stderr_;
libio_static_fn_required (_IO_f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33300
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
stdio.o is corrupted by --strip-unneeded.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33300
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Confirmed on Fedora 42 with glibc 2.41.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33300
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33291
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33291
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #24)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #22)
> > I am testing this:
> >
> > diff --git a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
> > index 8ba95b04e23..bbc679a31ef 100644
> > --- a/ld/ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33130
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33287
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33213
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33267
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.46
Status|WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33291
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu ---
I am testing this:
diff --git a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
index 8ba95b04e23..bbc679a31ef 100644
--- a/ld/ldlang.c
+++ b/ld/ldlang.c
@@ -2862,6 +2862,7 @@ lang_add_section (lang_statement_list_type *ptr,
{
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33291
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 pr33291]$ cat x.c
const long long int foo = 0x20001;
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 pr33291]$ cat y.c
const char bar = 1;
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 pr33291]$ make LD=./ld.master
gcc -B./ -O2 -fPIC -fmerge-all-constants -
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33300
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33294
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
FYI, I use a 32-bit GCC on Linux/x86-64 to build and test binutils in 32bit:
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ~]$ /usr/gcc-15.2.1-32bit/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/gcc-15.2.1-32bit/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPP
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33294
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> IF we want this, I can do ld-i386/no-plt.exp too.
Not all Linux/x86-64 OSes provides bits needed for -m32. We need
to check if -m32 works on Linux/x86-64, especially "
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33291
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16271
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16271&action=edit
A patch not to set sh_entsize for special sections
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
1 - 100 of 2578 matches
Mail list logo
