https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
Jeremi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
>
> --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
> (In reply to rguenther from comment #26)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to rguenther from comment #26)
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
> >
> > --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
> > (In
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
>
> --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
> (In reply to rguenther from comment #24)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to rguenther from comment #24)
> >
> > Shouldn't --gc-section tests be enabled in libstdc++ and mark them as XFAIL?
>
> Not sure how reliable we can identify those. Also we'd get
> XPASS then
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
>
> --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
> (In reply to rguenther from comment #22)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to rguenther from comment #22)
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
> >
> > --- Comment #21 from cvs-commit at gcc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
>
> --- Comment #21 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org> ---
> The
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #21 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=da8c5cfcc9fa7fc77878ce177d1b52348ae52f26
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #19 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9e223787a474c672c5f1cfd4574857241ae4eafa
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at redhat dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 10892
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10892=edit
A patch
I got
[hjl@gnu-cfl-1 rhbz-1543912]$ make
mkdir build
/usr/gcc-8.0.1-x32/bin/gcc -I ./src -flto -B./ -O2 -g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
The original testcase is fixed tho.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
We may also keep debug sections in otherwise unused files if there
is a .note.gnu.property section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
The crx and xgate FAILs are due to broken relocation processing. I don't think
they should be swept under the rug. HJ has already pointed out why mips is
failing in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 17 May 2017, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
>
> H.J. Lu changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=087ea5435ab5800e6c29671acab40dc6ca82
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b7c871edcd83ccdc5fcd8148a7f433efd6b52255
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-05/msg00195.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Some targets, like mips, keep input files when there are some special
sections, like .gnu.attributes, even if input file is unused otherwise.
In this case, all debug sections are kept.
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 10052
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10052=edit
Try this
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On May 16, 2017 7:17:40 PM GMT+02:00, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com"
wrote:
>https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
>
>--- Comment #2 from H.J.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Gold keeps all debug info even if they aren't needed:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr20882]$ cat t1.s
.text
.globl main
.type main, @function
main:
ret
.section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||21494
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You
31 matches
Mail list logo