Hi Amir,
I just found some small issue where addr2line finds the symbols if it
searches all sections but when call with '-j .text' (i.e. a single section
where the symbol in there) it doesn't finds it.
addr2linw without -j
addr2line -e helloworld 0x123456
helloworld.c:51
addr2line with -j
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19359
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6)
> Peter, I haven't investigated why gcc is misbehaving and I'm supposed to be
> on vacation. It is almost certainly an error in rs6000.h:ASM_CPU_SPEC.
Yes, it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19381
--- Comment #3 from Josh Triplett ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> You don't say which target you are using - some do have valid low memory
> addresses.
The default warning threshold would need to be target-specific. Many
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10773
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12548
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19379
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19372
Alexander E. Patrakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrakov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12548
--- Comment #20 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #19)
> Created attachment 8860 [details]
> Solaris specific version of previous patch
> I think that the problem is that the original patch affects generic
