[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-08 17:30 --- Hi Chris, Good catch. I have uploaded a patch to catch this form of unpredictable addressing. You may have some difficulty applying it as I created it from my local sources which have a second, uncommited

[Bug gas/11086] build failed

2009-12-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-14 11:01 --- Hi Yoshinori-san, Thanks for reporting this bug and supply the fix. I have applied your patch along with the changelog entry below. Cheers Nick gas/ChangeLog 2009-12-14 Yoshinori Sato ys

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-14 16:39 --- Created an attachment (id=4467) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4467action=view) More tests for unpredictable instructions -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-14 16:46 --- Hi Chris, I have checked in another patch (which should be in tomorrow's tarball) to fix the new cases you found and also to correct the snafu when post indexed addressing is used with an immediate offset 15

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-17 10:01 --- Hi Chris, I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying you don't want to flag all UNPREDICTABLES? Don't mind me, I was just whining... Did you catch all the load and store situations that are UNPREDICTABLE

[Bug gas/11109] Invalid vcvt UAL encoding

2009-12-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-21 16:51 --- Created an attachment (id=4476) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4476action=view) correctly encode vcvt instruction -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11109 --- You

[Bug gas/11109] Invalid vcvt UAL encoding

2009-12-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-21 16:52 --- Hi Anton, Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it fixes the problem for you. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11123] fails to build on trunk (uninitialized var in opcodes/arm-dis.c)

2010-01-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-04 10:23 --- Hi Matthias, I do not get this error message, but then I am probably using an older version of gcc to build the binutils than you. Anyway I have checked in the obvious fix to initialise the value variable

[Bug binutils/11128] Test for readelf is failing

2010-01-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-04 12:23 --- Created an attachment (id=4490) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4490action=view) Work around bugs in Sol 8 printf() implementation -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11128

[Bug binutils/11170] error in objdump disassemble for ARM target

2010-01-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-15 11:49 --- Created an attachment (id=4522) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4522action=view) Fix decoding of signed PC offsets -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11170 --- You

[Bug binutils/11170] error in objdump disassemble for ARM target

2010-01-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-15 11:50 --- Hi Mikaël, Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for you. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/11109] Invalid vcvt UAL encoding

2010-01-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-20 11:21 --- Patch checked in. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/4437] ld check all files are present and indicate those missing

2010-01-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-21 10:24 --- Created an attachment (id=4547) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4547action=view) Also continue after missing object files and missing sysrooted libraries -- What|Removed

[Bug ld/4437] ld check all files are present and indicate those missing

2010-01-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-21 10:25 --- Hi Jon, Thanks for the problem report and patch. I have taken the liberty of extending your patch to cover a few more areas (missing object files and missing sysrooted libraries) as well as fixing up

[Bug ld/4437] ld check all files are present and indicate those missing

2010-01-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-21 10:34 --- Patch checked in. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name

2010-01-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 12:09 --- Created an attachment (id=4561) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4561action=view) Issue warning for unseen sections mentioned in -j switches -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name

2010-01-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 12:09 --- Hi H.J. Is the uploaded patch OK with you ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name

2010-01-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 12:39 --- Created an attachment (id=4562) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4562action=view) Improved patch -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name

2010-01-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 12:40 --- Hi H.J. Ah - I should have run some regression tests before uploading that first patch - it breaks checks in the GAS testsuite that use multiple -j switches to match different possible names for data sections

[Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name

2010-01-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 15:26 --- Hi H.J. Should we set exit_status to 1 when issuing a warning? Thanks. Yup. Fixed. I have checked the patch in along with a couple of fixes to the testsuites for tests that were affected by the change

[Bug gas/11136] segmentaion fault while processing NEON arithmetric instructions

2010-01-29 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-29 16:04 --- Hi André Bergner, Thanks for the bug report and analysis. I decided that it would be safer to handle an ns value of NS_NULL inside the neon_check_type() function, as it is called from more places than just

[Bug ld/11219] LMA in link map versus object file disagrees

2010-02-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-05 13:54 --- Subject: Re: LMA in link map versus object file disagrees Hi Sterling, How about the following patch, which simply ensures that the bfd section's lma isn't stale? Approved - please apply. Cheers Nick

[Bug binutils/11240] Windres breaks down with spaces in rc source

2010-02-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-09 10:10 --- Hi, Linker error, could not find resource metal.pngtempleoftheancesteors This is more of a feature than a bug. What is happening is that windres now supports the concatenating of two double-quote enclosed

[Bug binutils/11238] make distclean does not clean up config.cache files

2010-02-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-09 12:15 --- Created an attachment (id=4581) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4581action=view) Delete config.cache files when reconfiguring -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11238

[Bug binutils/11238] make distclean does not clean up config.cache files

2010-02-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-09 12:18 --- Hi Jon, Thanks for the detailed instructions for reproducing the problem. I am now able to make it happen locally and I have found the problem - running configure with a new value of CFLAGS *before* running

[Bug binutils/11238] make distclean does not clean up config.cache files

2010-02-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-15 10:54 --- Hi Jon, Great - I have checked the patch in. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11297] Support for 8-bit relocations for AVR architecture

2010-02-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-23 11:42 --- Hi Andrew, Thanks for reporting this problem, and for providing the fix. I have checked your patch into the mainline sources along with these changelog entries. Cheers Nick gas/ChangeLog PR

[Bug binutils/11298] typos in windmc and windres manpages

2010-02-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-23 13:05 --- Hi Peter, Thanks for reporting this problem. The man pages are actually generated from a master source file (binutils/doc/binutils.texi), so I applied your patch there and then checked that the generated

[Bug ld/10858] ld generate broken PIE binaries on MIPS

2010-02-24 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-24 14:22 --- Hi Jay, Hi Aurelian, I have checked in the modified version of Alan's patch. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/6773] Typo in ARM saddsubx mnemonic

2010-02-24 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-24 15:12 --- Hi Jonas, I have checked in a patch to fix the disassembly of all of the prefixaddsubx and prefixsubaddx instructions so that they now use the UAL names. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed

[Bug binutils/11337] windres compiles menus and dialogs to UNICODE not ANSI

2010-03-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-03-05 12:43 --- Hi Ron, Have you tried using the --codepage=num switch to windres ? (I think that a value of 1252 might work. Either that or 0). Your zip file does not include the resources.h header file, so I could

[Bug gas/10143] Failed compilation at bfin-parse.c

2010-03-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-03-11 17:08 --- Hi Mike, was there a reason for also changing the error buffer from the stack to static ? adding the printf string %s makes sense, but it doesnt seem like it needs a static keyword added ... It is an old

[Bug binutils/11384] missing EOF statement at... eof of ld/emultempl/sh64elf.em

2010-03-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-03-18 13:18 --- Hi Aymeric, Thanks for pointing out this problem. I have checked in the patch as you described it. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11477] binutils toplevel Makefile is missing install-strip target

2010-04-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 11:35 --- Hi Aaro, This is actually the correct behaviour. The strip utility is part of a group of programs called the binutils. The command to install them is make install-binutils. There is no support for building

[Bug ld/11447] default section layout should be improved to reduce pagefaults

2010-04-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
|str) Fault #3 .dynstr should be in front of .dynsym Why? Both .gnu.version and .dynstr are referred to from .dynsym. ISTM that it would be as easy to improve the loader if it's reading them in a funny order. --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 11:53

[Bug ld/11447] default section layout should be improved to reduce pagefaults

2010-04-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 11:56 --- Hi Taras, This sounds like a loader problem to me, rather than a binutils bug. It is relatively easy to rearrange the order of the .gnu.version, .dynstr and .dynsym sections (see the uploaded patch), but I do

[Bug binutils/11430] nm crashes when handling some lib file.

2010-04-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 12:06 --- Hi Brook, Please could you upload a small test lib file that we can use to examine this problem ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11419] array signature[8] may be used uninitialized

2010-04-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 12:19 --- Created an attachment (id=4720) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4720action=view) Initialize the signature array -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11419 --- You

[Bug binutils/11419] array signature[8] may be used uninitialized

2010-04-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 12:20 --- Hi Chen, I have applied the uploaded patch to initialise the signature array. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11337] windres compiles menus and dialogs to UNICODE not ANSI

2010-04-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-14 15:52 --- Hi Ron, I am very sorry, but I have been unable to reproduce this problem. When I use the 2.20 version of windres I get a resource file with ANSI strings in it, not unicode. (I had to provide my own logo.bmp

[Bug ld/11398] Linker doesn't support priority with .preinit_array

2010-04-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-14 16:11 --- Hi H.J. I am not sure if this is a real problem. First of all I do not think that gcc will generate .preinit_array.priority sections, so they would have to be hand crafted by assembler source code. Secondly

[Bug gas/11395] gas creates 64bit add-instruction in 32bit mode for hppa2.0

2010-04-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/add2.s.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.2r2=1.3 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/basic.exp.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.13r2=1.14 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-16 11:23 --- Hi Michael, Sorry

[Bug gas/11517] Fatal error assembling ldgp for Alpha ECOFF

2010-04-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-20 14:33 --- Created an attachment (id=4736) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4736action=view) Make GPDISP relocs non-PC-relative -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11517 --- You

[Bug gas/11517] Fatal error assembling ldgp for Alpha ECOFF

2010-04-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-20 14:34 --- Hi Rainer, The uploaded patch fixes this problem for me, but since I no expert on this particular architecture I am not sure if it is the right solution. What do you think ? Cheers Nick

[Bug gas/11507] altmacro: wrong string interpretation

2010-04-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-20 15:53 --- Created an attachment (id=4737) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4737action=view) Fix parsing of LOCAL inside a string -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 --- You

[Bug binutils/11512] addr2line displays frong filename for GCC app compiled with -gcoff option

2010-04-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-20 17:10 --- Created an attachment (id=4740) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4740action=view) Add section address to symbol's value when looking up filenames -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla

[Bug binutils/11512] addr2line displays frong filename for GCC app compiled with -gcoff option

2010-04-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-20 17:12 --- Hi dvidvitop, I have uploaded a patch that *might* resolve the problem for you. Please try it out and let me know how you get on. If the patch does not work, please could you include some more detailed

[Bug binutils/11512] addr2line displays frong filename for GCC app compiled with -gcoff option

2010-04-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-21 07:02 --- Hi dzidzitop, Oops - sorry about that. I uploaded the wrong patch file by mistake. Please try out the new one instead. With this patch applied, using your test case I get: % addr2line -e bbb.exe 0x4013c0

[Bug binutils/11512] addr2line displays frong filename for GCC app compiled with -gcoff option

2010-04-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-21 07:01 --- Created an attachment (id=4744) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4744action=view) Correct patch: Adds section address to filename symbols' values -- What|Removed

[Bug gprof/11524] segmentation fault when use --external-symbol-table option

2010-04-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-27 14:47 --- Hi Hongsheng, Thanks for reporting this bug. I have checked in the patch that you described. Cheers Nick Clifton -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11513] Garbage is loaded into asection#lineno

2010-04-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-27 14:56 --- Hi Dzidzitop, Can you supply a small test case to demonstrate the problem please ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ld/11583] ld aborts in elf_link_output_extsym when given EXTERN() symbol in script.

2010-05-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-11 14:16 --- Created an attachment (id=4778) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4778action=view) Cope with unresolved references when exporing symbols -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug gas/11625] internal error in evax_frob_symbol assembling gmp 4.3.2 cntlz.asm

2010-05-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-25 09:52 --- Hi Jay, I have not had a lot of luck reproducing this problem. Is there any chance you could capture the tmp-cntlz.s file and upload that to this PR ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed

[Bug binutils/11624] bfd build breaks wrt alpha-dec-vms

2010-05-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
/bfd/doc/Makefile.in.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.104r2=1.105 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-25 10:29 --- Hi Jay, Thanks for the problem report and patch. I have checked in your fixes along with this changelog entry. Cheers Nick bfd/ChangeLog 2010-05-25 Jay

[Bug ld/11621] .o vs. obj = @OBJEXT@

2010-05-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
?cvsroot=srcr1=1.1645r2=1.1646 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/Makefile.am.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.124r2=1.125 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/Makefile.in.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.148r2=1.149 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-25 14

[Bug ld/11618] Add an option to page-align .bss

2010-05-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-25 16:02 --- Hi Taras, [You did not mention which target architecture(s) you are interested in, so I have just tested the following on an x86 host]. There should be no need to add a new command line option to the linker

[Bug ld/11612] New underscoring behavior can break -aligncomm directve

2010-05-26 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-26 08:20 --- Hi Doug, I tried to reproduce this problem but could not. Would it be possible for you to upload the test.o file from your example ? Also please could you check to see if the problem still exists

[Bug binutils/11633] bintuils testsuit fails if built with CFLAGS=-fstack-protector-all

2010-05-26 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-26 13:46 --- Created an attachment (id=4815) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4815action=view) demonstration patch -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11633 --- You are receiving

[Bug binutils/11633] bintuils testsuit fails if built with CFLAGS=-fstack-protector-all

2010-05-26 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-26 13:49 --- Hi Peter, Well you could modify the default_ld_simple_link in the linker testsuite library so that it adds the missing symbols. (See the uploaded patch). But this introduces other failures in the testsuite

[Bug gas/11601] Solaris assembler compatability doesn't work

2010-05-26 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-26 14:25 --- Created an attachment (id=4817) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4817action=view) Potentially improved error message -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11601 --- You

[Bug gas/11601] Solaris assembler compatability doesn't work

2010-05-26 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-05-26 14:29 --- Hi H.J. The assembler is failing to parse the .section directive because the # character starts a line comment. If you assemble your test case with the -f option added to the command line then it will work

[Bug binutils/11676] objdump -d forget 0e float prefix

2010-06-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-06-16 15:13 --- Hi Vincent, Thanks for reporting this problem. I have applied your patch and created a gas testcase for it as well. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ld/11675] -- oformat binary or srec broken

2010-06-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-06-16 16:18 --- Hi Vincent, I am unable to reproduce this problem. Please could you provide a small test case that demonstrates it ? (Note - I did run the ld-srec tests but although the tests failed to link there were

[Bug ld/11675] -- oformat binary or srec broken

2010-06-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11675 --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug gas/11673] move.l #1,2(a0) should fail on isab

2010-06-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/m68k/all.exp.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.21r2=1.22 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-06-16 16:29 --- Hi Vincent, Thank you for the bug report and patch. I have applied your patch and created a couple of ChangeLog entries to go along

[Bug binutils/11711] directory names conflict with windres include directories

2010-06-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
and do not complain if it does. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.1652r2=1.1653 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/windres.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.41r2=1.42 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com

[Bug ld/11675] -- oformat binary or srec broken

2010-06-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-06-21 10:10 --- Hi Vincent, Duh - I wonder why that did not work for me when I tried. Anyway I can now reproduce the problem. It is possible to fix the code in bfd_elf_m68k_set_target_options to avoid the seg-fault, but I

[Bug ld/11675] -- oformat binary or srec broken

2010-06-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-06-21 10:11 --- Created an attachment (id=4854) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4854action=view) Issue an error if an attempt is made to change the output format whilst linking m68k-elf binaries -- http

[Bug gas/11801] GAS ignores -fno-delayed-branch for functions with inline assembly

2010-07-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-07-16 15:59 --- Hi Andrew, This is not a GAS bug, but rather a feature of the assembly code generated by gcc. Have a look at the asm.s file in your tarball. Just before the start of the exhibit_bug function there is a .set

[Bug gold/11855] New: GOLD: PROVIDE: does not provide symbols only referenced in linker script

2010-07-29 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: nickc at redhat dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: any GCC host triplet: any GCC target triplet: any http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11855 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

[Bug gold/11899] New: segments not sorted by LMA

2010-08-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
-- Summary: segments not sorted by LMA Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: nickc at redhat dot com

[Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA

2010-08-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-08-10 11:19 --- Created an attachment (id=4922) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4922action=view) Sort segments by their load address -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899 --- You

[Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA

2010-08-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-08-10 11:20 --- Proposed patch uploaded. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who

[Bug gas/11835] Infinite recursive loop in @FILE option

2010-08-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-08-12 13:41 --- Hi Chin, This is actually a bug in the libiberty library that is used to pre-parse the assembler command line. I have filed a bug report here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00899.html I have

[Bug binutils/11843] ld long link times due to compute_bucket_count() choosing hash table size

2010-08-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
=srcr1=1.373r2=1.374 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-08-12 16:24 --- Hi Todd, I have checked in your patch - thanks very much for creating it. Cheers Nick bfd/ChangeLog 2010-08-12 Todd Veldhuizen todd.veldhui...@logicblox.com PR ld/11843

[Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA

2010-08-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-08-20 08:43 --- Created an attachment (id=4943) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4943action=view) Revised patch -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA

2010-08-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-08-20 08:45 --- Hi Ian, Thanks for catching that for me. Your suggested improvement works just fine, so I have uploaded a revised patch. OK to apply ? Cheers Nick gold/ChangeLog 2010-08-20 Nick Clifton ni

[Bug gold/11985] GOLD seg-faults if it cannot create needed output sections

2010-09-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-06 08:56 --- I have just uploaded a small patch which adds debug information to gold for when it tries and fails to create an output section. Enabled by running gold with the --debug script option. I am not sure whether

[Bug binutils/11983] libbfd reuses pointer passed to bfd_openr

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 10:54 --- Hi Carlo, The correct thing to do is to take a copy of the filename, rather than relying upon the original still being valid. So, please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for you

[Bug binutils/11973] mn10300 assembler produce incorrect calls address for far calls (32bit) when command contain nonzero stack and/or saving registers

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/tc-mn10300.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.71r2=1.72 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 11:08 --- Hi, Thanks for reporting this problem and providing a patch. I have checked the patch in, but there is one remaining issue - do you have

[Bug gas/11972] Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 14:27 --- Created an attachment (id=4970) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4970action=view) Fix ARM parsing of bignums -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11972 --- You

[Bug gas/11972] Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 16:37 --- Hi Ryan, I may be confused here, but -4294967296 is the same as -(0x1), right ? So wouldn't that mean that the 2.19.1 assembler was wrong and that the current assembler, with the patch applied

[Bug binutils/11938] Support for linking with Solaris libraries is only enabled on SPARC!

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 16:49 --- Hi Andrew, I am not quite sure what you have in mind here, so please could you generate a patch. Please keep in mind that tools like readelf ought to be able to process Solaris libraries even if they were

[Bug ld/11931] Segfault in ld (elf_link_output_extsym) when defining symbols with a constraint on a non-existent section

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 17:02 --- Created an attachment (id=4971) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4971action=view) Skip abort for linker created symbols. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11931

[Bug gas/11972] Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails

2010-09-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/tc-arm.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.455r2=1.456 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 07:40 --- Patch applied. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11938] Support for linking with Solaris libraries is only enabled on SPARC!

2010-09-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 10:12 --- Hi Andrew, The code I looked at already allows i[34]86 targets to see[1] these features. Where exactly were you thinking that changes needed to be made ? Cheers Nick [1] I said see rather than work

[Bug ld/11931] Segfault in ld (elf_link_output_extsym) when defining symbols with a constraint on a non-existent section

2010-09-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 10:16 --- Hi Alan, Nick, I think you're just papering over the real problem here. Our handling of assignments inside ONLY_IF... sections is quite broken. To see more problems, try the link with a map file. :-( I

[Bug ld/11931] Segfault in ld (elf_link_output_extsym) when defining symbols with a constraint on a non-existent section

2010-09-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/mn10300/basic.exp.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.15r2=1.16 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 10:42 --- Oops - please ignore that commit - it was for PR 11973, not this PR. Cheers

[Bug binutils/11973] mn10300 assembler produce incorrect calls address for far calls (32bit) when command contain nonzero stack and/or saving registers

2010-09-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 10:41 --- Hi, Thanks - that was great. I have converted the assembler source into a gas testcase and checked it in to the repository. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11983] libbfd reuses pointer passed to bfd_openr

2010-09-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 14:24 --- Created an attachment (id=4974) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4974action=view) Revised patch -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11983] libbfd reuses pointer passed to bfd_openr

2010-09-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 14:25 --- Hi Carlo, Further resting revealed some problems with the first version of the patch, so I have uploaded a revised version. Please could you try this one out ? Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org

[Bug gold/11997] Different behevior of MEMORY regions

2010-09-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
/memory_test.t.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.1r2=1.2 --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-10 11:55 --- Hi H.J. This is related to PR 11985. GOLD insists on creating some sections in the output file which LD does not. It is not related to the MEMORY region code. I

[Bug gold/11997] Different behevior of MEMORY regions

2010-09-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-27 15:41 --- There is a discrepancy between the behaviour of LD and GOLD with regard to unspecified VMA and LMA values for sections mentioned in linker scripts that use memory regions. LD will place any section which does

[Bug ld/12161] Unconforming ELF file causes SIGSEGV in avr-ld

2010-10-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12161 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2010-10-27 13:25:57 UTC --- Created attachment 5090 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5090 Delete elf32_avr_check_relocs function -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug ld/12161] Unconforming ELF file causes SIGSEGV in avr-ld

2010-10-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12161 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug binutils/12075] cross binutils-2.20.51.0.11 doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

2010-10-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/12073] addr2line unwind inlined functions does not always work with dwarf2

2010-10-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12073 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug ld/12001] Linker includes archive members when symbols therein have already been defined

2010-10-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12001 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2010-10-28 13:42:29 UTC --- Created attachment 5095 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5095 Add early definition of --defsym symbols. -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug ld/12001] Linker includes archive members when symbols therein have already been defined

2010-10-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12001 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/12058] ar s command undocumented

2010-10-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12058 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2010-10-28 14:14:35 UTC --- Created attachment 5096 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5096 Remove 's' command from ar --help output -- Configure bugmail: http

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >