Eugen Dedu wrote:
Is there a rationale for this, i.e. chmod to use umask?
It's specified by POSIX. I expect the idea was to make it a bit harder to grant
permissions that the user didn't intend.
On 18/12/16 18:34, Pádraig Brady wrote:
tag 25223 notabug
close 25223
stop
On 18/12/16 12:37, Eugen Dedu wrote:
Hi,
chmod +w file does not work:
snoopy:~$ touch ff
snoopy:~$ ls -l ff
-rw-r--r-- 1 ededu ededu 0 Dec 18 13:31 ff
snoopy:~$ chmod +w ff
snoopy:~$ ls -l ff
-rw-r--r-- 1 ededu ededu
tag 25223 notabug
close 25223
stop
On 18/12/16 12:37, Eugen Dedu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> chmod +w file does not work:
>
> snoopy:~$ touch ff
> snoopy:~$ ls -l ff
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ededu ededu 0 Dec 18 13:31 ff
> snoopy:~$ chmod +w ff
> snoopy:~$ ls -l ff
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ededu ededu 0 Dec 18 13:31 ff
>
Hi,
chmod +w file does not work:
snoopy:~$ touch ff
snoopy:~$ ls -l ff
-rw-r--r-- 1 ededu ededu 0 Dec 18 13:31 ff
snoopy:~$ chmod +w ff
snoopy:~$ ls -l ff
-rw-r--r-- 1 ededu ededu 0 Dec 18 13:31 ff
snoopy:~$ chmod +x ff
snoopy:~$ ls -l ff
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ededu ededu 0 Dec 18 13:31 ff
snoopy:~$
