bug#6667: dd ?bug? while making image of hdd with bad sectors

2018-10-10 Thread Assaf Gordon
tags 6667 notabug close 6667 stop Hello, On 19/07/10 08:44 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 19/07/10 10:05, Jakub Muszynski wrote: I have been trying to make a dd copy : dd if=/dev/sdb conv=noerror,sync bs=4096k|pv| dd of=usb320.dd conv=noerror,sync bs=4096k > dd320.LOG but image took all my

bug#6667: dd ?bug? while making image of hdd with bad sectors

2010-07-19 Thread Jakub Muszynski
Hello, It's my first post here, i hope it might be usefull. My full story can be found here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9607705#post9607705 I will try to summarize it here: I have broken (fall) hdd, now im sure that's contain ~2GB od broken sectors, in 1/3 of disc capacity. I have

bug#6667: dd ?bug? while making image of hdd with bad sectors

2010-07-19 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 19/07/10 10:05, Jakub Muszynski wrote: Hello, It's my first post here, i hope it might be usefull. My full story can be found here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9607705#post9607705 I will try to summarize it here: I have broken (fall) hdd, now im sure that's contain ~2GB

Is this a DD bug?

2009-11-07 Thread daniel_nysveen
Hi, I have a strange dd problem when running the dd command on brand new hard drives.  I am often creating clones of hard drives and I have come across something I don't understand. If I DD to a hard drive that has been previously used, the DD takes about 35 minutes. If I clone to a

Re: Is this a DD bug?

2009-11-07 Thread Pádraig Brady
daniel_nysv...@comcast.net wrote: I have a strange dd problem when running the dd command on brand new hard drives. If I DD to a hard drive that has been previously used, the DD takes about 35 minutes. If I clone to a completely brand new drive, the DD takes over 100 minutes. If I

dd / bug report / summary incorrect

2009-05-03 Thread Horvath Andras
Dear Developers, I found a tiny bug in the dd command of the coreutils package. I tested it with dd version 6.1 and 7.1 too. Unfortunately i don't have the chance to test the latest development version. Description: --- When running the following command: dd if=/dev/zero of=test

dd bug

2006-08-22 Thread alu2024
dd if=/dev/zero of=obj/kern/bochs.img~ count=1 2/dev/null /bin/sh: line 1: 5952 Segmentation Fault dd if=/dev/zero of=obj/kern/bochs.img~ count=1 2/dev/null make: *** [obj/kern/bochs.img] Error 139 dd if=p1.tar of=p2.tar 13500+0 records in 13500+0 records out Segmentation Fault

Re: dd bug

2006-08-22 Thread Paul Eggert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: dd if=/dev/zero of=obj/kern/bochs.img~ count=1 2/dev/null /bin/sh: line 1: 5952 Segmentation Fault dd if=/dev/zero of=obj/kern/bochs.img~ count=1 2/dev/null I don't observe this bug. Perhaps it's a bug in your operating system, outside of 'dd'? I'm afraid

Possible dd bug? No close of if=/of= fds

2005-12-07 Thread HARDY, Steven
Hello, I'm experiencing some problems trying to use dd to load firmware onto a device, and I guess this could be a potential bug? - dd if=myfirmware.bin of=/dev/mydevice The problem is that /dev/mydevice returns -EIO if the load has been unsuccessful, but dd always returns 0 whether

RE: Possible dd bug - no close of if=/of= fds

2005-12-07 Thread HARDY, Steven
: Possible dd bug - no close of if=/of= fds HARDY, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm experiencing some problems trying to use dd to load firmware onto a device, and I guess this could be a potential bug? - dd if=myfirmware.bin of=/dev/mydevice The problem is that /dev/mydevice returns -EIO

Re: patch from Oct 2003 for dd's error-handling code [Re: dd bug

2004-06-03 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you send me a patch that applies cleanly (the patch below gets six failed hunks), I'll test it. OK, thanks, here's a clean patch. I don't know how to test it easily, though, since one needs a bad device (with

Re: dd bug

2003-09-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Buciuman Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: read(0, 1 ..., 737280) = 36864 write(1, 1 ..., 737280) = 737280 read(0, 0x4015a000, 737280) = -1 EIO (Input/output error) write(2, dd: , 4) = 4 write(2,

Re: dd bug

2003-09-17 Thread Paul Eggert
Buciuman Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've post a message some weeks ago about a possible dd bug. I assume that you're talking about this one? http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-08/msg00105.html What do you think about ? Is that indeed a bug ? It's not easy to say. I

Re: dd bug

2003-09-17 Thread Buciuman Adrian
I've post a message some weeks ago about a possible dd bug. I assume that you're talking about this one? http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-08/msg00105.html Yes , indeed . What do you think about ? Is that indeed a bug ? It's not easy to say. I can't easily

Re: dd bug

2003-09-17 Thread Paul Eggert
, because I ' ve tried the dd that comes with FreeBSD . It worked well . The hardware was the same . It could be a GNU dd bug; or it could be a kernel or driver bug. To help decide this, can you please run the following shell command, and then email the contents of the file 'trace' to [EMAIL

dd bug

2003-09-16 Thread Buciuman Adrian
I've post a message some weeks ago about a possible dd bug. From: Buciuman Adrian Subject: dd 5.0 seeking after an error bug Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:02:31 -0700 What do you think about ? Is that indeed a bug ? Or my message ( my English ) was not very clear ? Thanks , Adrian Buciuman