Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Here's a fix to make ls -LR work the same way Solaris 10's /bin/ls
>>> does in the presence of a cycle.
>
> It makes sense to exit(2) along with the printed error.
> The patch looks good.
Thanks for the review.
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Here's a fix to make ls -LR work the same way Solaris 10's /bin/ls
>> does in the presence of a cycle.
It makes sense to exit(2) along with the printed error.
The patch looks good.
cheers,
Pádraig.
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Here's a fix to make ls -LR work the same way Solaris 10's /bin/ls
> does in the presence of a cycle.
I've tweaked the patch to udpate the documentation, too.
>From 9fad0c69f218a57c9404f7c1137961eec5a818f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 1
