Le 25/02/2018 à 03:24, Pádraig Brady a écrit :
On 20/02/18 00:04, Declercq Laurent wrote:
Le 20/02/2018 à 04:26, Pádraig Brady a écrit :
2. Non-permission bits are preserved, even when the --no-preserve=mode
option is involved.
Original file to copy: prwSrw-rw- 1 root staff 0 févr. 18 18:59
On 20/02/18 00:04, Declercq Laurent wrote:
> Le 20/02/2018 à 04:26, Pádraig Brady a écrit :
>>> 2. Non-permission bits are preserved, even when the --no-preserve=mode
>>> option is involved.
>>>
>>> Original file to copy: prwSrw-rw- 1 root staff 0 févr. 18 18:59 spfile
>>> cp(1) command (run as
Le 20/02/2018 à 04:26, Pádraig Brady a écrit :
2. Non-permission bits are preserved, even when the --no-preserve=mode
option is involved.
Original file to copy: prwSrw-rw- 1 root staff 0 févr. 18 18:59 spfile
cp(1) command (run as root user): cp -r --no-preserve=mode spfile
spfile_copy
Current
On 19/02/18 02:22, Declercq Laurent wrote:
> I think that I did found at least two bugs in cp(1) command when the
> --no-preserve=mode option is involved and when copying special file. I
> describe each of them below.
>
> 1. Mode set on special files seem to be wrong:
>
> Original file to
I think that I did found at least two bugs in cp(1) command when the
--no-preserve=mode option is involved and when copying special file. I
describe each of them below.
1. Mode set on special files seem to be wrong:
Original file to copy: prw-rw-rw- 1 root staff 0 févr. 18 18:59 spfile
cp(1)
