bug#65697: numproc, add flag to get number of available cores

On 02/09/2023 10:38, Simon Heimberg wrote: Hello Depending on what a process is mainly limited by, the ideal number of processes to run concurrently varies. A frequent use case is to run one process on each _physical_ core (which is available) than on each logical processing unit. I propose to

bug#65599: mv and cp give a pointless warning when moving/copying a directory

On 2023-09-02 04:18, Bruno Haible wrote: chmod fails with EACCES, hence per POSIX it's buggy. Thanks, I reported the bug with chmod, chown, etc. to the linux-cifs mailing list, here:

bug#65659: RFC: changing printf(1) behavior on %b

Stephane Chazelas wrote in <20230902084912.vdfedsgbnat2w...@chazelas.org>: |2023-09-01 23:28:50 +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The \ |Open Group: ... |>|FWIW, a "printf %b" github shell code search returns ~ 29k |>|entries

bug#65599: mv and cp give a pointless warning when moving/copying a directory

Paul Eggert wrote: > Yes please. If chmod also does not work coreutils might need more > workarounds. > > Just to be clear; please try it on a file where chmod should fail > because you don't own the file and you're not root. chmod should fail > with EPERM in this case; it it fails with EACCES

bug#65697: numproc, add flag to get numer of available cores

Hello Depending on what a process is mainly limited by, the ideal number of processes to run concurrently varies. A frequent use case is to run one process on each _physical_ core (which is available) than on each logical processing unit. I propose to introduce a flag --core which returns the

bug#65659: RFC: changing printf(1) behavior on %b

On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 8:10 PM Stephane Chazelas wrote: > 2023-09-01 07:54:02 -0500, Eric Blake via austin-group-l at The Open Group: > > > FWIW, a "printf %b" github shell code search returns ~ 29k > entries > ( > https://github.com/search?q=printf+%25b+language%3AShell=code=Shell > ) > > Ha

bug#65659: RFC: changing printf(1) behavior on %b

Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote in <20230901181024.pwx4plwclz7ij...@chazelas.org>: |2023-09-01 07:54:02 -0500, Eric Blake via austin-group-l at The Open Group: ... |> How many scripts in the wild actually use %b, though? And if there |> are such scripts, anything

bug#65659: RFC: changing printf(1) behavior on %b

2023-09-01 23:28:50 +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group: [...] > |FWIW, a "printf %b" github shell code search returns ~ 29k > |entries > |(https://github.com/search?q=printf+%25b+language%3AShell=code=Sh\ > |ell) > | > |That likely returns only a small subset of