On 17/08/17 21:55, A. Wilcox wrote:
> On 13/08/17 11:22, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Pádraig Brady
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/08/17 11:49, A. Wilcox wrote:
>>>
FAIL: tests/misc/csplit-io-err ==
>>> This was due to an inconsistency in the errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/08/17 11:22, Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Pádraig Brady
> wrote:
>> On 11/08/17 11:49, A. Wilcox wrote:
>>
>>> FAIL: tests/misc/csplit-io-err ==
>> This was due to an inconsistency in the
On 13/08/17 09:22, Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 11/08/17 11:49, A. Wilcox wrote:
>>
>>> FAIL: tests/misc/csplit-io-err
>>> ==
>> This was due to an inconsistency in the errors output by seq.
>> A fix for that buglet i
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 11/08/17 11:49, A. Wilcox wrote:
>
>> FAIL: tests/misc/csplit-io-err
>> ==
> This was due to an inconsistency in the errors output by seq.
> A fix for that buglet is attached.
>
>> FAIL: tests/misc/printf-surpri
On 11/08/17 11:49, A. Wilcox wrote:
> FAIL: tests/misc/csplit-io-err
> ==
This was due to an inconsistency in the errors output by seq.
A fix for that buglet is attached.
> FAIL: tests/misc/printf-surprise
>
Depending on exit 141 couple
Probing further at printf-surprise.sh, it appears that the problem is:
* musl is unaffected by the printf bug being tested
* therefore, it does successfully output 20 MiB of blank space
* `head -c 10 fifo` will read the first 10 characters of the fifo
* the rest of the 20 MiB cannot be written,
The first test failure, csplit-io-err, seems to be a simple error
message format change.
The third test failure, sort-debug-warn, seems to be sensitive to
locales. I am not sure the best way to fix this.
Best,
--arw
--
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
http://adelielinux.org
=
