Thanks!
* Dmitry Selyutin [171120 20:17]:
> Hi Darshit,
>
> I've just pushed your patch. I took the liberty to
> format it as if it was sent via git format-patch.
> Thank you again!
--
Thanking You,
Darshit Shah
PGP Fingerprint: 7845 120B 07CB D8D6 ECE5 FF2B 2A17
Hi Darshit,
I've just pushed your patch. I took the liberty to
format it as if it was sent via git format-patch.
Thank you again!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Dmitry,
That's perfectly fine. Long as I know that it is being looked into, it's okay.
There's always so many things that are going on and other items often take
priority. No issues.
* Dmitry Selyutin [171120 06:40]:
> Hi Darshit,
>
> the reason is actually very
Hi Darshit,
the reason is actually very simple: I just had no time to apply it due to
activities on a regular work. Hopefully I'll continue developing
gnulib-tool in the end of this week. The patch seems to be OK though; I'll
try to push it this evening. Thank you again and sorry for the delay.
It's been a while. Atleast some response on why it isn't being accepted would
be appreciated
* Darshit Shah [171113 09:07]:
> Hi,
>
> Is there something blocking this patch? It doesn't seem like it has been
> merged
> yet.
>
> * Darshit Shah
Hi,
Is there something blocking this patch? It doesn't seem like it has been merged
yet.
* Darshit Shah [170913 00:19]:
> * Dmitry Selyutin [170911 21:32]:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > > As explained above, this patch helps converge gnulib-tool.py and
> >
* Dmitry Selyutin [170911 21:32]:
> Hi all,
>
> > As explained above, this patch helps converge gnulib-tool.py and
> > gnulib-tool. There is a behavioural difference which I also consider to
> > be a regression, and hence a string need to fix it.
> Thanks for the patch!
Hi all,
> As explained above, this patch helps converge gnulib-tool.py and
> gnulib-tool. There is a behavioural difference which I also consider to
> be a regression, and hence a string need to fix it.
Thanks for the patch! Looks perfectly fine from my side. Could you push it
into the
Hi Bruno,
> Hi Darshit,
>
> > * pygnulib/GLImport.py(_update_ignorelist_): Append the ignore data to
> > any existing VCS ignore files instead of replacing them
>
> We cannot judge this patch, for lack of information about what it does and
> why it is needed.
Sorry, I meant to have a detailed
Hi Darshit,
> * pygnulib/GLImport.py(_update_ignorelist_): Append the ignore data to
> any existing VCS ignore files instead of replacing them
We cannot judge this patch, for lack of information about what it does and
why it is needed.
1) What is the problem with the current behaviour of
* Eric Blake [170911 14:00]:
> On 09/11/2017 06:49 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> > * pygnulib/GLImport.py(_update_ignorelist_): Append the ignore data to
> > any existing VCS ignore files instead of replacing them
> > ---
> > pygnulib/GLImport.py | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2
On 09/11/2017 06:49 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> * pygnulib/GLImport.py(_update_ignorelist_): Append the ignore data to
> any existing VCS ignore files instead of replacing them
> ---
> pygnulib/GLImport.py | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
* pygnulib/GLImport.py(_update_ignorelist_): Append the ignore data to
any existing VCS ignore files instead of replacing them
---
pygnulib/GLImport.py | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pygnulib/GLImport.py b/pygnulib/GLImport.py
index 4352a7ec5..b0e3ec655
13 matches
Mail list logo