Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
Sam, Simon,
Sam Steingold wrote:
Ok, so please do create a module and guarantee the stability. :-)
This wish makes sense: We have a module 'threadlib' which only determines
how to link with the thread library, without providing any replacements.
I can
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Yes this makes sense. Please push it!
Done, I pushed it.
Bruno
Hi Eric,
Eric Blake wrote:
Also, that
particular declaration at line 585 of wctype.h (line 282 of wctype.in.h)
is guarded by:
#if ! @HAVE_ISWCNTRL@ || @REPLACE_ISWCNTRL@
#elif ! @HAVE_ISWBLANK@
So knowing the value of all the HAVE_IS* and REPLACE_IS* from config.log
would be
Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/01/2010 12:48 PM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
+++ update-copyright.test-ex-stderr 2010-08-31 22:20:22.981772600 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-update-copyright.test-ex.4: warning: FSF copyright statement not found
-update-copyright.test-ex.5: warning: FSF copyright statement
Hello!
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
2010-09-02 Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org
wctype: Avoid compilation error on IRIX 6.5.30.
* lib/wctype.in.h (iswblank): Declare with a replacement if
REPLACE_ISWBLANK is set.
* m4/wctype_h.m4 (gl_WCTYPE_H): Check also
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:04:50PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/01/2010 12:48 PM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
+ exec zsh ./test-vc-list-files-cvs.sh --no-reexec
Tom, since the reexec lost all tracing, what about:
zsh -vx ./test-vc-list-files-cvs.sh
Sure, output here:
On 09/02/2010 08:02 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
zsh -vx ./test-vc-list-files-cvs.sh
Sure, output here:
http://jupiterrise.com/tmp/zsh_vx_test-vc-list-files-cvs.out
Thanks. I definitely see a couple of problems.
First, there's no 'emulate sh' command anywhere in the trace, and zsh
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:21:46PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello!
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
2010-09-02 Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org
wctype: Avoid compilation error on IRIX 6.5.30.
* lib/wctype.in.h (iswblank): Declare with a replacement if
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:49:58PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
IRIX mis-parses 1e 1 as 10.0 and instead of 1.0 and e 1.
Because the original parse may differ from the reparse in terms
of whether the value overflows, we have to do an errno dance.
* lib/strtod.c (strtod): Reparse number on
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:53:54PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Sure. I've just pushed the following.
Can someone confirm that 5.6.0 works, or even
find what precise version is barely new enough?
I just tried the test on RHEL 2.1 with perl 5.6.1
and it fails in the same way.
The test works on
Tom G. Christensen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:53:54PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Sure. I've just pushed the following.
Can someone confirm that 5.6.0 works, or even
find what precise version is barely new enough?
I just tried the test on RHEL 2.1 with perl 5.6.1
and it fails in the
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:25:51AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/02/2010 08:02 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
echo $BASH_VERSION
+ echo '3.1.16(1)-release'
3.1.16(1)-release
test $(echo y) = y || exit 1
cho y
++ cho y
bash: line 2: cho: command not found
+ test = y
bash: line 2: test:
Bruno's proposed changes are mostly good, but I have a few quibbles:
+Don't make the program ugly just to placate warnings from tools other
+than those that you use on a daily basis.
This isn't quite right. Suppose a programmer uses 'lint' on a daily
basis? They they can make a program ugly
Is gnulib bootstrap designed for reuse in other projects?
I'm finding it extremely difficult to understand a lot of the code, let alone
incorporate it into Libtool. I have some fixes for the obvious bugs, and a lot
of questions about the design choices, below. In short, it could use a
On 09/02/2010 10:36 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Is gnulib bootstrap designed for reuse in other projects?
Yes; I know that it is already shared among coreutils, grep, libvirt,
and several other projects. However, improvements are certainly welcome.
I'll tackle the questions I know an answer
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Is gnulib bootstrap designed for reuse in other projects?
I'm finding it extremely difficult to understand a lot of the code,
let alone incorporate it into Libtool.
...
Hi Gary,
You're right, bootstrap is not pretty. It has grown mostly by accretion.
It is used in
I installed this as an obvious fix for a recently-installed typo.
* lib/hash.c (safe_hasher): Result is pointer, not pointer to
const; otherwise, there is a type error later.
---
ChangeLog |6 ++
lib/hash.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Tom's IRIX setup had a broken bash, and proceeded to run zsh
outside of POSIX mode. But trying to trace that setup proved
difficult, since the re-exec lost tracing.
* tests/init.sh: Borrow autoconf POSIX-mode sanitization. Pass
-vx through shell re-exec.
Reported by Tom G. Christensen.
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
1. gnulib_mk
# Name of the Makefile.am
gnulib_mk=gnulib.mk
What is this for? The only use in the rest of the script is inside the
slurp() function, who's purpose I cannot fathom:
if test $file = Makefile.am test X$gnulib_mk != XMakefile.am;
On 09/02/2010 08:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Next, your trace showed the cause of the first message:
+mktempd_:51 template_length_=+mktempd_:1 wc -c
+mktempd_:51 template_length_=' 16'
+mktempd_:52 nx_=+mktempd_:1 echo gt-init.sh.
+mktempd_:52 nx_=+mktempd_:1 wc -c
+mktempd_:52 nx_=' 12'
And theres more...
On 2 Sep 2010, at 23:36, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Is gnulib bootstrap designed for reuse in other projects?
I'm finding it extremely difficult to understand a lot of the code, let alone
incorporate it into Libtool. I have some fixes for the obvious bugs, and a
lot of
[adding bug-gnulib]
On 09/02/2010 03:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
IF we want to use gitlog to create the ChangeLog, then either of these
is fine with me. However, see below.
iii) fix the gitlog entries -- if that's even viable?
I don't think (iii) will work. You can play all sorts
On 9/2/2010 5:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/02/2010 03:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
Two people worked on a single patch, or someone submitted it, and then
one of the people with commit access modified the patch slightly. The
GCS says you should do this, in the ChangeLog:
On 09/02/2010 03:16 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/2/2010 5:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/02/2010 03:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
Two people worked on a single patch, or someone submitted it, and then
one of the people with commit access modified the patch slightly. The
GCS says you should
On 09/02/2010 09:35 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:49:58PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
IRIX mis-parses 1e 1 as 10.0 and instead of 1.0 and e 1.
Because the original parse may differ from the reparse in terms
of whether the value overflows, we have to do an errno dance.
25 matches
Mail list logo
