Padraig Brady and Jim Meyering wrote:
> > All improvements look good to me.
>
> Likewise.
OK, I pushed it.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Jim Meyering writes:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> On 16/10/16 12:55, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi,
The 'getprogname' module test fails on Cygwin 2.6, because the returned
value is "tes
Hello,
Jim Meyering writes:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 16/10/16 12:55, Bruno Haible wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The 'getprogname' module test fails on Cygwin 2.6, because the returned
>>> value is "test-getprogname", not "test-getprogname.exe". (On mingw, on the
>>
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 16/10/16 12:55, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The 'getprogname' module test fails on Cygwin 2.6, because the returned
>> value is "test-getprogname", not "test-getprogname.exe". (On mingw, on the
>> other hand, it really is "test-getpro
On 16/10/16 12:55, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 'getprogname' module test fails on Cygwin 2.6, because the returned
> value is "test-getprogname", not "test-getprogname.exe". (On mingw, on the
> other hand, it really is "test-getprogname.exe".)
>
> Also, while at it, I'd like to add comments
Hi,
The 'getprogname' module test fails on Cygwin 2.6, because the returned
value is "test-getprogname", not "test-getprogname.exe". (On mingw, on the
other hand, it really is "test-getprogname.exe".)
Also, while at it, I'd like to add comments:
1. The declaration in getprogname.h does not state
