Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 02:09 AM, Alexander Malmberg wrote: This patch seems to have broken parts of the string handling. When I tried running the test suite today, it not only failed, it dumped core during the string tests. I re-ran the tests and it was fine ... then I checked and fou

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Alexander Malmberg
This patch seems to have broken parts of the string handling. When I tried running the test suite today, it not only failed, it dumped core during the string tests. Our test suite isn't complete in any way, but it does cover a lot of things, and a fair amount of important stuff. I'd like to strong

[bug #5205] Service menu in palette doesn't act as service menu and problem of delete menu

2003-09-10 Thread nobody
=== BUG #5205: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT === http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5205&group_id=99 Submitted by: yjchen Project: GNUstep Submitted on: Wed 09/10/2003 at 17:52 Category: Gorm Severit

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Pete French
> just tired this with your favourit UTF-8 page and I was able to copy it > from Mozilla over to Ink. Great now all that Unicode copying should be > working. (Not that I ever wanted to copy that page anyway) Thats great news :-) Just wish I could try it myself (see todays other postings on FreeB

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Fred Kiefer
Hi Pete, just tired this with your favourit UTF-8 page and I was able to copy it from Mozilla over to Ink. Great now all that Unicode copying should be working. (Not that I ever wanted to copy that page anyway) Cheers Fred Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 10:41 P

Re: [Patch/base](HEAD) GSObjCSuper

2003-09-10 Thread David Ayers
Adam Fedor wrote: On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 03:28 AM, David Ayers wrote: * Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h (GSObjCSuper): Added test for uninitialized superclass reference. Commited to HEAD. (And will commit to the branch if no one objects.) OK. I'm not cer

Re: [Patch/base](HEAD) GSObjCSuper

2003-09-10 Thread Adam Fedor
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 03:28 AM, David Ayers wrote: * Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h (GSObjCSuper): Added test for uninitialized superclass reference. Commited to HEAD. (And will commit to the branch if no one objects.) OK. I'm not certain though, whethe

[RFA/base](HEAD) remove -[NSObject compare:]

2003-09-10 Thread David Ayers
Hello everyone, I think we can now safely remove NSObject's compare declaration/implementation from -base. GDL2 has been updated and I've check GSWeb and other projects in dev-libs that they send compare: to typed recivers of valid types. I'm not sure what we should do on the branch. We don'

[Patch/gdl2] -compare:

2003-09-10 Thread David Ayers
Hello everyone, Wow! I didn't realize how messy "ObjC hygiene" can be :-). This patch prepares GDL2 for the removal of the -compare: declaration/implementation of -base. Committed: * EOControl/EOFault.m (+[EOFault respondsToSelector:]): Use GSObjCRuntime functions and corr

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread David Ayers
Pete French wrote: All the other methods should already be implemented in NSString.m in terms of those primitives. Are there any existing subclasses of NSString which use these methods that I could use for testing, or is it best to actually make my own subclass for testing purposes ? Current

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 01:01 PM, Pete French wrote: All the other methods should already be implemented in NSString.m in terms of those primitives. Are there any existing subclasses of NSString which use these methods Not that I know of. that I could use for testing, or is it best t

Fundamental BSD problem...

2003-09-10 Thread Pete French
Having completed a build and install of thelatest CVS there is a very fiundamental probelm on BSd systems. I am getting the following error: xyz: kvm_read: Bad address xyz: cannot read IdlePTD CANT OPEN KERNEL when trying to run the simplest of command line tools. This looks to me like an error i

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Pete French
> All the other methods should already be implemented in NSString.m in > terms of those primitives. Are there any existing subclasses of NSString which use these methods that I could use for testing, or is it best to actually make my own subclass for testing purposes ? Currently it sounds like th

Documentation buold woes - FreeBSD 4.8

2003-09-10 Thread Pete French
In Gui... gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home/pfrench/gnustep/core/gui/Source' cp ../Documentation/Gui/Gui.gsdoc . cp ../Documentation/GuiAdditions/GuiAdditions.gsdoc . Making all for doc Gui... Generating reference documentation... Bus error (core dumped) Running gdb on the coredump giuves the

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 12:34 PM, Pete French wrote: The one in NSString.m is used whenever anyone implements their own subclass of NSString. O.K., so I can test that by making an empty subclass of NSString then ? Unfortunately not quite that simple ... NSString is the semi-abstract

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Pete French
> The one in NSString.m is used whenever anyone implements their own > subclass of NSString. O.K., so I can test that by making an empty subclass of NSString then ? -bat. ___ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/list

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Pete French wrote: BTW- I dont understand some of the GNUstep architecture that well. There are several implementations of rangeOfComposedCharaterSequenecAtIndex - how do I know which is used when ? I note that one of them appears not to use the isn

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Pete French
> Thanks ... looked OK and seemed to work (not break my existing code) > so I applied it, though I don't have any testcases for what it's > supposed to do. I've got some that I use for internal testing - but the most obvious is that you should now be able to read any valid UTF-8 sequence into a s

[Patch/base](HEAD) GSObjCSuper

2003-09-10 Thread David Ayers
* Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h (GSObjCSuper): Added test for uninitialized superclass reference. Commited to HEAD. (And will commit to the branch if no one objects.) I'm not certain though, whether we want to commit the previos patch: 2003-08-24 David Ayers

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 10:41 PM, Pete French wrote: Sorry about this, please ignore the last UTF8/UTF16 patch, this one has a slight change which makes it better (but got missed in the original email). The addition is to consider the high word of the surrogate pairs as non-spacing. That

Re: NSCalendarDate bug?

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 05:51 AM, Rob Burns wrote: The small program to calculate age, that follows, usually returns the right answer. But, given a birthdate of 1981/9/23 it will return: 2003-09-08 21:42:38.591 age[3987] Age = 22 years, -1 months, 15 days (because it uses 'todays d