Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat clear downloads unexpectedly destructive

The workaround would be to move all downloads to another folder, and then clear the list. In addition, the "clear history" setting at exit shouldn't affect downloads. -M. 2016-11-15 1:39 GMT+02:00, J.H. : > Icecat android : no option to.remove items from > download list

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Tor code base

Hello all I'm not 'voting' as I do not fully understand what is going on to cause all the debate and argument. I started using Icecat as I felt I had a noticeable performance improvement over the over offerings. Since then it has not updated much and appears to be well behind the Firefox base at

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Tor code base

ng0 writes: > "Daniel Quintiliani" writes: > >> Should we use the Tor code as a basis for Icecat? >> >> 1. Yes >> 2. No >> >> I vote #1 > > Assuming that you mean torbrowser code, where most of it is being > upstreamed anyway, I vote #1 I change my

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 45 IMPORTANT consideration: Keep cookie prompt "ask me every time"

You an now click on "Votes" and add your vote(s) on https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49607 On 2016-09-27 04:51, mdn wrote: I don't understand what's the problems with cookies options. To understand my POV I'll explain what's my experience. I understood the problems with cookies

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat future development

I don't support.. ..using Torbrowser as a base, because it is its own thing now. Since torbrowser upstreams many of its patches, then it's just as good to take stuff from upstream, as I see the requirement for a general-purpose browser that's better, of less bloat, and has slightly better security