Narcis Garcia wrote:
>
> IceCat 45 must have vulnerabilities too, and then someone will ask for
> Icecat 52, etc.
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2016-95/--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Should I just ignore this guy now? Because he's starting to sound like he's
nuts.
--
-Dan Q
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 21:38:27 +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> IceCat 45 must have vulnerabilities too, and then someone will ask for
> Icecat 52, etc.
>
>
> El 30/12/16 a les
IceCat 45 must have vulnerabilities too, and then someone will ask for
Icecat 52, etc.
El 30/12/16 a les 17:44, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
> Numerous remote code execution vulnerabilities? You're kidding me right?
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:06:10 +0100, Narcis Garcia
it's OK. private = secure in the same way policy compliant = secure. :-)
> On Dec 30, 2016, at 8:44 AM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>
> Numerous remote code execution vulnerabilities? You're kidding me right?
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:06:10 +0100, Narcis
Numerous remote code execution vulnerabilities? You're kidding me right?
--
-Dan Q
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:06:10 +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> People asking for a new IceCat version for Windows, they already have
> IceCat 38.8.0 ans it seems usable.
> Any freedom and
Hello,
I don't understand it why. The first time I run "icecat", it turns on
the sound. I used right click on the link.
When I say "turns on sound", I mean, it unmutes the loudspeakers or
maybe increases volume, I don't know. But if there is nothing related
to sound, it should not be.
I have
People asking for a new IceCat version for Windows, they already have
IceCat 38.8.0 ans it seems usable.
Any freedom and security enhancement they ask for, it's to GNU/Linux
direction.
El 29/12/16 a les 23:58, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
> I think there's been a real problem lately where
Let's work for people means & knowledge!
El 29/12/16 a les 15:35, Mart Rootamm ha escrit:
> IceCat on Windows would be like wearing warm clothes in the cold in a
> bad neighborhood. The bad neighborhood being a proprietary operating
> system.
>
> Many people don't have the means or the