Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Emoji in IceCat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi David, As Mart wrote in his reply, my initial issue has been resolved. I'm not sure, though, if creating a bug report for this would be appropriate, as IIRC emoji have been a problem in terms of displaying them ever since I installed IceCat (both the downloads from gnu.org/s/gnuzilla and Guix). Working around the issue at hand is quite easy once you're aware of the about:config options and are not afraid to use it. For me, it wasn't a problem once I got the know-how from Mart, but it may confuse "normal" users who most likely expect emoji to work out-of-the-box. However, that's just my two cents, so feel free to ignore it. - -- Felix Fröhlich GnuPG: AC26CC3F517BA1794743512E32E7A8DAB442426F On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 21:19 +0200, David Hedlund wrote: > Mart, is this "Emoji in IceCat" issue a bug or not? > > > On 2018-04-20 19:51, Mart Rootamm wrote: > > Felix, > > There are additional font size settings in about:config, if you > > search > > there just with 'font'. > > > > The about:config solution is one, though in some operating systems, > > browsers typically default to the closest possible match, if they > > rely > > on the OS to match missing characters, thus precluding the trip to > > about:config. > > > > wrt font size, can you send a screenshot of what the Noto emoji > > look > > like for you with text? > > For example, both in a plain Wikipedia article, and in a textarea > > (editing an article). > > > > wrt to replies, then I originally sent a reply both to bug- > > gnuzilla, > > and a carbon copy to you. On assumption, that you've subscribed > > anyway, then I won't :cc you. > > > > -M. > > > > 2018-04-20 0:52 GMT +03:00, Felix Fröhlich> de>: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > > Whoops. Apparently that email didn't include the previous reply I > > > sent > > > to Mart. Here you go: > > > > > > Hi Mart, > > > > > > Great! Thanks for the advice. > > > > > > I added the Noto Color Emoji font to the following > > > about:config > > > settings: > > > > > > * font.name.monospace.x-unicode > > > * font.name.sans-serif.x-unicode > > > * font.name.serif.x-unicode > > > > > > Now the Emoji actually do show up. They're way too big, > > > though ^^ > > > > > > I'll play around with the font settings and see if I can > > > manage > > > this; Maybe I'll have to use a different font. > > > > > > - -- > > > Felix Fröhlich > > > GnuPG: AC26CC3F517BA1794743512E32E7A8DAB442426F > > > > > > On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 23:33 +0200, Felix Fröhlich wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > So, erm, that was... not optimal. I wrote the mail to Mart and > > > > bug- > > > > gnuz > > > > i...@lists.gnu.org because for some reason I believed that was > > > > the > > > > correct email address... Please don't ask me why. > > > > > > > > Anyhow, with Mart's help I figured out how to display the emoji > > > > (see > > > > below). > > > > > > > > I also found out that -- for some reason I don't know -- the > > > > Noto > > > > Color > > > > Emoji font on my system appears to be corrupted, as the font > > > > shows up > > > > as what looks like a rounded square in gnome-font-viewer (see > > > > attachment). Not sure what causes this, but I fell back to the > > > > uncoloured version of that font, namely Noto Emoji. It's no big > > > > deal, > > > > really. > > > > > > > > Now all emoji that I wanted to display show up just fine. > > > > > > > > Thanks again for your help, Mart! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > > > iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEErCbMP1F7oXlHQ1EuMueo2rRCQm8FAlrZD7QACgkQMueo2rRC > > > Qm8zvw/9Hstj1r/u5kb7+8R+PTr32FjujwvDzZg1J5Nb598evLHhDUZ8KeQdW3aD > > > TTbi31ICOOnrHCzG0/5tKW3sbY0J8tKFV7oEuj+gWdAmTCRSaLKQxBho7iHSIsaL > > > vdhQZt8wtMwN9XGeOaGZm5Ifq6Ykz9rTS24IWfzb5mZ5/9ojXsDy7x2C92g/evQW > > > YOR+Qp2xukY9sjVDYqjrHP4visJIDR8wyXsezNKUA1wbsUnOmHb7oygtMMV0iEMZ > > > A87SP/kah3Nscue7f/c/3J1E61XoB0rPwsI7vp3ZrKjz6nC/nBqI4D3l3t06So38 > > > pC2cQKvOZ5jEykvnSiGQdSVGLZfAjL8k/6kXuLyLDeY6ppQqZ4GGKAeopqNgH+SP > > > ZF2rc5U+r02QH83o597fVMOIS+o0yftH8O9e9FCIBD4ttxBEjPjyNqr/KlPw7378 > > > Oit3sWi46dWC8bv95gvidROCPvEuTcXWBuVlVO89BsQRj7uuIt8cmcxJkr7SmjLY > > > tlIetL03muTkMZ1+uBHeIgl35t5hp+NsZgcK4aAvn82RmRAXPQzDQZSff4NmUdX0 > > > qLuET207xRUZh8l3ZOnhyZiwGN6b97DSYbpUPRw0Pr6vs9gsLyjJwPetEJiaTp+/ > > > jrJ3l+yDy9/+kwAn0Jsn4h8ksGUdcn2JYCFFt350d8VNVjowQj0= > > > =1nZe > > > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > > > > > -- > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEErCbMP1F7oXlHQ1EuMueo2rRCQm8FAlrahecACgkQMueo2rRC Qm+gAQ/+MVbgKgpaq5hd+thqpA/4JiJ91seICSJgtl86ZpcMBTBbgKkNfNH06Tc1 S2c7Bo08s/0bmT7o4nxQ2WJALuzZhrmdfgFl4KuSez6nV8CD68qmEhns6TvCO3tj
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Emoji in IceCat
Hi Matt, As for the Noto Emoji font, everything's a-okay. They show up in the size of the surrounding text, and even though they're not coloured (because they're not coloured in the font, either), they work just as you'd expect emoji to work. When using the Noto Color Emoji font, however, it produces results as shown in the pictures attached. As you may notice, they are WAY oversized for the area they're supposed to be displayed in. The first attachment (emoji-regular.png) shows the emoji as they show up on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Emoji_(Unicode_block). The second one (emoji-textarea.png) shows the emoji when used in a text area. The emoji was pasted in line 7 as last character on the line. As I said, though, I am pretty sure the oversized display is due to my installation of the font (or the font in general?) being corrupted or unusable, not a bug in IceCat. With regard to the replies: Yes, I am subscribed to the list, so there's no need to CC me :) -- Felix Fröhlich GnuPG: AC26CC3F517BA1794743512E32E7A8DAB442426F On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 20:51 +0300, Mart Rootamm wrote: > Felix, > There are additional font size settings in about:config, if you > search > there just with 'font'. > > The about:config solution is one, though in some operating systems, > browsers typically default to the closest possible match, if they > rely > on the OS to match missing characters, thus precluding the trip to > about:config. > > wrt font size, can you send a screenshot of what the Noto emoji look > like for you with text? > For example, both in a plain Wikipedia article, and in a textarea > (editing an article). > > wrt to replies, then I originally sent a reply both to bug-gnuzilla, > and a carbon copy to you. On assumption, that you've subscribed > anyway, then I won't :cc you. > > -M. > > 2018-04-20 0:52 GMT +03:00, Felix Fröhlich>: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Whoops. Apparently that email didn't include the previous reply I > > sent > > to Mart. Here you go: > > > > Hi Mart, > > > > Great! Thanks for the advice. > > > > I added the Noto Color Emoji font to the following about:config > > settings: > > > > * font.name.monospace.x-unicode > > * font.name.sans-serif.x-unicode > > * font.name.serif.x-unicode > > > > Now the Emoji actually do show up. They're way too big, though > > ^^ > > > > I'll play around with the font settings and see if I can manage > > this; Maybe I'll have to use a different font. > > > > - -- > > Felix Fröhlich > > GnuPG: AC26CC3F517BA1794743512E32E7A8DAB442426F > > > > On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 23:33 +0200, Felix Fröhlich wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > So, erm, that was... not optimal. I wrote the mail to Mart and > > > bug- > > > gnuz > > > i...@lists.gnu.org because for some reason I believed that was > > > the > > > correct email address... Please don't ask me why. > > > > > > Anyhow, with Mart's help I figured out how to display the emoji > > > (see > > > below). > > > > > > I also found out that -- for some reason I don't know -- the Noto > > > Color > > > Emoji font on my system appears to be corrupted, as the font > > > shows up > > > as what looks like a rounded square in gnome-font-viewer (see > > > attachment). Not sure what causes this, but I fell back to the > > > uncoloured version of that font, namely Noto Emoji. It's no big > > > deal, > > > really. > > > > > > Now all emoji that I wanted to display show up just fine. > > > > > > Thanks again for your help, Mart! > > > > > > -- > > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEErCbMP1F7oXlHQ1EuMueo2rRCQm8FAlrZD7QACgkQMueo2rRC > > Qm8zvw/9Hstj1r/u5kb7+8R+PTr32FjujwvDzZg1J5Nb598evLHhDUZ8KeQdW3aD > > TTbi31ICOOnrHCzG0/5tKW3sbY0J8tKFV7oEuj+gWdAmTCRSaLKQxBho7iHSIsaL > > vdhQZt8wtMwN9XGeOaGZm5Ifq6Ykz9rTS24IWfzb5mZ5/9ojXsDy7x2C92g/evQW > > YOR+Qp2xukY9sjVDYqjrHP4visJIDR8wyXsezNKUA1wbsUnOmHb7oygtMMV0iEMZ > > A87SP/kah3Nscue7f/c/3J1E61XoB0rPwsI7vp3ZrKjz6nC/nBqI4D3l3t06So38 > > pC2cQKvOZ5jEykvnSiGQdSVGLZfAjL8k/6kXuLyLDeY6ppQqZ4GGKAeopqNgH+SP > > ZF2rc5U+r02QH83o597fVMOIS+o0yftH8O9e9FCIBD4ttxBEjPjyNqr/KlPw7378 > > Oit3sWi46dWC8bv95gvidROCPvEuTcXWBuVlVO89BsQRj7uuIt8cmcxJkr7SmjLY > > tlIetL03muTkMZ1+uBHeIgl35t5hp+NsZgcK4aAvn82RmRAXPQzDQZSff4NmUdX0 > > qLuET207xRUZh8l3ZOnhyZiwGN6b97DSYbpUPRw0Pr6vs9gsLyjJwPetEJiaTp+/ > > jrJ3l+yDy9/+kwAn0Jsn4h8ksGUdcn2JYCFFt350d8VNVjowQj0= > > =1nZe > > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > > > > > -- > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Emoji in IceCat
David, > Mart, is this "Emoji in IceCat" issue a bug or not? Felix's initial issue is resolved. He did complain about the too big font size for his emoji font, so now I'm waiting for a screenshot from him. -M. 2018-04-20 22:19 GMT +03:00, David Hedlund: > Mart, is this "Emoji in IceCat" issue a bug or not? > > > On 2018-04-20 19:51, Mart Rootamm wrote: >> Felix, >> There are additional font size settings in about:config, if you search >> there just with 'font'. >> >> The about:config solution is one, though in some operating systems, >> browsers typically default to the closest possible match, if they rely >> on the OS to match missing characters, thus precluding the trip to >> about:config. >> >> wrt font size, can you send a screenshot of what the Noto emoji look >> like for you with text? >> For example, both in a plain Wikipedia article, and in a textarea >> (editing an article). >> >> wrt to replies, then I originally sent a reply both to bug-gnuzilla, >> and a carbon copy to you. On assumption, that you've subscribed >> anyway, then I won't :cc you. >> >> -M. >> >> 2018-04-20 0:52 GMT +03:00, Felix Fröhlich : >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA512 >>> >>> Whoops. Apparently that email didn't include the previous reply I sent >>> to Mart. Here you go: >>> >>> Hi Mart, >>> >>> Great! Thanks for the advice. >>> >>> I added the Noto Color Emoji font to the following about:config >>> settings: >>> >>> * font.name.monospace.x-unicode >>> * font.name.sans-serif.x-unicode >>> * font.name.serif.x-unicode >>> >>> Now the Emoji actually do show up. They're way too big, though ^^ >>> >>> I'll play around with the font settings and see if I can manage >>> this; Maybe I'll have to use a different font. >>> >>> - -- >>> Felix Fröhlich >>> GnuPG: AC26CC3F517BA1794743512E32E7A8DAB442426F >>> >>> On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 23:33 +0200, Felix Fröhlich wrote: Hi all, So, erm, that was... not optimal. I wrote the mail to Mart and bug- gnuz i...@lists.gnu.org because for some reason I believed that was the correct email address... Please don't ask me why. Anyhow, with Mart's help I figured out how to display the emoji (see below). I also found out that -- for some reason I don't know -- the Noto Color Emoji font on my system appears to be corrupted, as the font shows up as what looks like a rounded square in gnome-font-viewer (see attachment). Not sure what causes this, but I fell back to the uncoloured version of that font, namely Noto Emoji. It's no big deal, really. Now all emoji that I wanted to display show up just fine. Thanks again for your help, Mart! -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >>> >>> iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEErCbMP1F7oXlHQ1EuMueo2rRCQm8FAlrZD7QACgkQMueo2rRC >>> Qm8zvw/9Hstj1r/u5kb7+8R+PTr32FjujwvDzZg1J5Nb598evLHhDUZ8KeQdW3aD >>> TTbi31ICOOnrHCzG0/5tKW3sbY0J8tKFV7oEuj+gWdAmTCRSaLKQxBho7iHSIsaL >>> vdhQZt8wtMwN9XGeOaGZm5Ifq6Ykz9rTS24IWfzb5mZ5/9ojXsDy7x2C92g/evQW >>> YOR+Qp2xukY9sjVDYqjrHP4visJIDR8wyXsezNKUA1wbsUnOmHb7oygtMMV0iEMZ >>> A87SP/kah3Nscue7f/c/3J1E61XoB0rPwsI7vp3ZrKjz6nC/nBqI4D3l3t06So38 >>> pC2cQKvOZ5jEykvnSiGQdSVGLZfAjL8k/6kXuLyLDeY6ppQqZ4GGKAeopqNgH+SP >>> ZF2rc5U+r02QH83o597fVMOIS+o0yftH8O9e9FCIBD4ttxBEjPjyNqr/KlPw7378 >>> Oit3sWi46dWC8bv95gvidROCPvEuTcXWBuVlVO89BsQRj7uuIt8cmcxJkr7SmjLY >>> tlIetL03muTkMZ1+uBHeIgl35t5hp+NsZgcK4aAvn82RmRAXPQzDQZSff4NmUdX0 >>> qLuET207xRUZh8l3ZOnhyZiwGN6b97DSYbpUPRw0Pr6vs9gsLyjJwPetEJiaTp+/ >>> jrJ3l+yDy9/+kwAn0Jsn4h8ksGUdcn2JYCFFt350d8VNVjowQj0= >>> =1nZe >>> -END PGP SIGNATURE- >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >>> >> -- >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Emoji in IceCat
Mart, is this "Emoji in IceCat" issue a bug or not? On 2018-04-20 19:51, Mart Rootamm wrote: Felix, There are additional font size settings in about:config, if you search there just with 'font'. The about:config solution is one, though in some operating systems, browsers typically default to the closest possible match, if they rely on the OS to match missing characters, thus precluding the trip to about:config. wrt font size, can you send a screenshot of what the Noto emoji look like for you with text? For example, both in a plain Wikipedia article, and in a textarea (editing an article). wrt to replies, then I originally sent a reply both to bug-gnuzilla, and a carbon copy to you. On assumption, that you've subscribed anyway, then I won't :cc you. -M. 2018-04-20 0:52 GMT +03:00, Felix Fröhlich: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Whoops. Apparently that email didn't include the previous reply I sent to Mart. Here you go: Hi Mart, Great! Thanks for the advice. I added the Noto Color Emoji font to the following about:config settings: * font.name.monospace.x-unicode * font.name.sans-serif.x-unicode * font.name.serif.x-unicode Now the Emoji actually do show up. They're way too big, though ^^ I'll play around with the font settings and see if I can manage this; Maybe I'll have to use a different font. - -- Felix Fröhlich GnuPG: AC26CC3F517BA1794743512E32E7A8DAB442426F On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 23:33 +0200, Felix Fröhlich wrote: Hi all, So, erm, that was... not optimal. I wrote the mail to Mart and bug- gnuz i...@lists.gnu.org because for some reason I believed that was the correct email address... Please don't ask me why. Anyhow, with Mart's help I figured out how to display the emoji (see below). I also found out that -- for some reason I don't know -- the Noto Color Emoji font on my system appears to be corrupted, as the font shows up as what looks like a rounded square in gnome-font-viewer (see attachment). Not sure what causes this, but I fell back to the uncoloured version of that font, namely Noto Emoji. It's no big deal, really. Now all emoji that I wanted to display show up just fine. Thanks again for your help, Mart! -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEErCbMP1F7oXlHQ1EuMueo2rRCQm8FAlrZD7QACgkQMueo2rRC Qm8zvw/9Hstj1r/u5kb7+8R+PTr32FjujwvDzZg1J5Nb598evLHhDUZ8KeQdW3aD TTbi31ICOOnrHCzG0/5tKW3sbY0J8tKFV7oEuj+gWdAmTCRSaLKQxBho7iHSIsaL vdhQZt8wtMwN9XGeOaGZm5Ifq6Ykz9rTS24IWfzb5mZ5/9ojXsDy7x2C92g/evQW YOR+Qp2xukY9sjVDYqjrHP4visJIDR8wyXsezNKUA1wbsUnOmHb7oygtMMV0iEMZ A87SP/kah3Nscue7f/c/3J1E61XoB0rPwsI7vp3ZrKjz6nC/nBqI4D3l3t06So38 pC2cQKvOZ5jEykvnSiGQdSVGLZfAjL8k/6kXuLyLDeY6ppQqZ4GGKAeopqNgH+SP ZF2rc5U+r02QH83o597fVMOIS+o0yftH8O9e9FCIBD4ttxBEjPjyNqr/KlPw7378 Oit3sWi46dWC8bv95gvidROCPvEuTcXWBuVlVO89BsQRj7uuIt8cmcxJkr7SmjLY tlIetL03muTkMZ1+uBHeIgl35t5hp+NsZgcK4aAvn82RmRAXPQzDQZSff4NmUdX0 qLuET207xRUZh8l3ZOnhyZiwGN6b97DSYbpUPRw0Pr6vs9gsLyjJwPetEJiaTp+/ jrJ3l+yDy9/+kwAn0Jsn4h8ksGUdcn2JYCFFt350d8VNVjowQj0= =1nZe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Emoji in IceCat
Felix, There are additional font size settings in about:config, if you search there just with 'font'. The about:config solution is one, though in some operating systems, browsers typically default to the closest possible match, if they rely on the OS to match missing characters, thus precluding the trip to about:config. wrt font size, can you send a screenshot of what the Noto emoji look like for you with text? For example, both in a plain Wikipedia article, and in a textarea (editing an article). wrt to replies, then I originally sent a reply both to bug-gnuzilla, and a carbon copy to you. On assumption, that you've subscribed anyway, then I won't :cc you. -M. 2018-04-20 0:52 GMT +03:00, Felix Fröhlich: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Whoops. Apparently that email didn't include the previous reply I sent > to Mart. Here you go: > > Hi Mart, > > Great! Thanks for the advice. > > I added the Noto Color Emoji font to the following about:config > settings: > > * font.name.monospace.x-unicode > * font.name.sans-serif.x-unicode > * font.name.serif.x-unicode > > Now the Emoji actually do show up. They're way too big, though ^^ > > I'll play around with the font settings and see if I can manage > this; Maybe I'll have to use a different font. > > - -- > Felix Fröhlich > GnuPG: AC26CC3F517BA1794743512E32E7A8DAB442426F > > On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 23:33 +0200, Felix Fröhlich wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> So, erm, that was... not optimal. I wrote the mail to Mart and bug- >> gnuz >> i...@lists.gnu.org because for some reason I believed that was the >> correct email address... Please don't ask me why. >> >> Anyhow, with Mart's help I figured out how to display the emoji (see >> below). >> >> I also found out that -- for some reason I don't know -- the Noto >> Color >> Emoji font on my system appears to be corrupted, as the font shows up >> as what looks like a rounded square in gnome-font-viewer (see >> attachment). Not sure what causes this, but I fell back to the >> uncoloured version of that font, namely Noto Emoji. It's no big deal, >> really. >> >> Now all emoji that I wanted to display show up just fine. >> >> Thanks again for your help, Mart! >> >> -- >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEErCbMP1F7oXlHQ1EuMueo2rRCQm8FAlrZD7QACgkQMueo2rRC > Qm8zvw/9Hstj1r/u5kb7+8R+PTr32FjujwvDzZg1J5Nb598evLHhDUZ8KeQdW3aD > TTbi31ICOOnrHCzG0/5tKW3sbY0J8tKFV7oEuj+gWdAmTCRSaLKQxBho7iHSIsaL > vdhQZt8wtMwN9XGeOaGZm5Ifq6Ykz9rTS24IWfzb5mZ5/9ojXsDy7x2C92g/evQW > YOR+Qp2xukY9sjVDYqjrHP4visJIDR8wyXsezNKUA1wbsUnOmHb7oygtMMV0iEMZ > A87SP/kah3Nscue7f/c/3J1E61XoB0rPwsI7vp3ZrKjz6nC/nBqI4D3l3t06So38 > pC2cQKvOZ5jEykvnSiGQdSVGLZfAjL8k/6kXuLyLDeY6ppQqZ4GGKAeopqNgH+SP > ZF2rc5U+r02QH83o597fVMOIS+o0yftH8O9e9FCIBD4ttxBEjPjyNqr/KlPw7378 > Oit3sWi46dWC8bv95gvidROCPvEuTcXWBuVlVO89BsQRj7uuIt8cmcxJkr7SmjLY > tlIetL03muTkMZ1+uBHeIgl35t5hp+NsZgcK4aAvn82RmRAXPQzDQZSff4NmUdX0 > qLuET207xRUZh8l3ZOnhyZiwGN6b97DSYbpUPRw0Pr6vs9gsLyjJwPetEJiaTp+/ > jrJ3l+yDy9/+kwAn0Jsn4h8ksGUdcn2JYCFFt350d8VNVjowQj0= > =1nZe > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org