I don't support..
..using Torbrowser as a base, because it is its own thing now. Since
torbrowser upstreams many of its patches, then it's just as good to
take stuff from upstream, as I see the requirement for a
general-purpose browser that's better, of less bloat, and has slightly
better security
Vote for ng0's proposal on https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49604
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Additional input I just got:
The only addition which makes torbrowser use tor is the torbutton, which
I was told (currently I have no torbrowser access) can be turned off and
on.
Well this and maybe the default proxy settings, but I can't test at the
moment.
ng0
awake...@tutanota.de writes:
> Sounds really good. we have alot to learn from tor browser. I hope it wont
> break functionality for normie use or we will loose alot of users. keep in
> mind that Tor has become severely mainstream and is likely compromised on
> many levels by the global elite
Sounds really good. we have alot to learn from tor browser. I hope it wont
break functionality for normie use or we will loose alot of users. keep in mind
that Tor has become severely mainstream and is likely compromised on many
levels by the global elite cult that runs our country and our
It can be interesing Icecat to be a torbrowser derivative (or together)
instead of being alone Firefox derivative.
What about ESR-only versions policy?
El 13/08/16 a les 21:47, ng0 ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> I had an exchange of ideas with other people after the recent security
> announcement of
Hi,
I had an exchange of ideas with other people after the recent security
announcement of firefox[2].
The state of torbrowser was brought up in Guix as a problem and a
discussion before, in the attempt to figure out how to package
torbrowser compatible to our system.
It was pointed out to me