[bug #65110] [PATCH] [gropdf] should not include full argv[0] in diagnostic messages

Update of bug#65110 (group groff): Summary: [gropdf] should not include full argv[0] in diagnostic messages => [PATCH] [gropdf] should not include full argv[0] in diagnostic messages ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Thank you,

[bug #65115] [PATCH] BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry

Follow-up Comment #4, bug#65115 (group groff): > I can push this fix with others later today if Deri doesn't beat me to it. I'm unlikely to win that race. I did take part in the UK National Spastic Games, in my youth, representing the South-East region. Well before paralympics. Won 3 golds and

[bug #64592] [troff] registers .m and .M contain no initial value

Follow-up Comment #13, bug#64592 (group groff): [comment #12 comment #12:] > If no one objects to my proposed change in comment #10, please set this ticket's status to "Confirmed" and I'll take care of it. > > Or someone else can. It's a one-liner! But I don't know what _mom_(7) will need to

[bug #65112] [gropdf] glyphs missing from groff_char(7) but not warned about

Update of bug#65112 (group groff): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => gbranden ___ Follow-up Comment #10: No, it was not

[bug #65115] [PATCH] BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry

Update of bug#65115 (group groff): Status: Confirmed => In Progress ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message

[bug #65112] [gropdf] glyphs missing from groff_char(7) but not warned about

Follow-up Comment #9, bug#65112 (group groff): [comment #8 comment #8:] > On Bookworm I did this:- I have that same package installed but apparently its contents are not the ones that get found on my system. Did you mean to update/clear the "Status" and "Assigned to" fields? >

[bug #65112] [gropdf] glyphs missing from groff_char(7) but not warned about

Update of bug#65112 (group groff): Status: In Progress => None Assigned to:gbranden => None ___ Follow-up Comment #8: On Bookworm I did

[bug #65112] [gropdf] glyphs missing from groff_char(7) but not warned about

Update of bug#65112 (group groff): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => gbranden ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #65112] [gropdf] glyphs missing from groff_char(7) but not warned about

Follow-up Comment #7, bug#65112 (group groff): Hi Deri, Thanks for the explanation! I got this ancient version of the Symbol font from this Debian package. $ dpkg -s gsfonts Package: gsfonts Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: text Installed-Size: 4439 Maintainer:

[bug #65115] [PATCH] BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry

Update of bug#65115 (group groff): Summary: BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry => [PATCH] BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #65115] BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry

Update of bug#65115 (group groff): Status: Invalid => Confirmed Open/Closed: Closed => Open ___ Follow-up Comment #3: Sorry, my bad, I was

[bug #65115] BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry

Update of bug#65115 (group groff): Item Group:None => Incorrect behaviour Status: Fixed => Invalid Assigned to:None => gbranden Open/Closed:

[bug #65117] [pdfmark] premature page break in "pdfmark.ms" output with page size A4

Update of bug#65117 (group groff): Summary: [pdfmark] premature page brake in "pdfmark.ms" output with page size A4 => [pdfmark] premature page break in "pdfmark.ms" output with page size A4 ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Per

[bug #65115] BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry

Update of bug#65115 (group groff): Status:None => Fixed Summary: U-BMI and U-BMR show switched font names in fonts_{n,x}.pdf => BMI and BMR definitions are switched in Foundry.in for the U foundry

[bug #65110] [gropdf] should not include full argv[0] in diagnostic messages

Follow-up Comment #1, bug#65110 (group groff): testing per sr #111000 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Savannah

[bug #65112] [gropdf] glyphs missing from groff_char(7) but not warned about

Follow-up Comment #6, bug#65112 (group groff): Apologies for the brevity, it was one of those "go to bed and wake up bolt upright with the answer", just wanted you to confirm the fix was good. Now the explanation:- Type 1 fonts have a section of numbered subroutines which can be called from the