Hi Pierre and Aiko,
Pierre Langlois writes:
> I believe we'll have to update the package as well. For example on
> aarch64 I can do a `guix pull' just fine, however `guix system reconfigure'
> fails because it builds the full guix package, including running the
> tests.
>
> You've mentioned
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, dem 06.01.2022 um 04:35 + schrieb
raid5atemyhomework:
> I recently upgraded, and on reboot found that the Gnome Shell extension
> Dash to Dock was no longer working properly.
>
> Instead of displaying my favorite applications on the bottom dock, it
> only displays the
- Forwarded message from Gleb Gorshkov -
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 23:52:27 +0500
From: Gleb Gorshkov
To: Leo Famulari
Subject: Re: bug#52957: Switching from gdm lead to error
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Keyboard-Layout.htmlI have
found solution. Actually bug was caused by
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 02:40:55PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 10:11:01AM -0900, Christopher Howard wrote:
> > Package "freedroidrpg" fails to build:
> [...]
> > ld: addon_crafting_ui.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `tux_rendering';
> > action.o:(.bss+0x0): first
Hello Guix World,
I recently upgraded, and on reboot found that the Gnome Shell extension Dash to
Dock was no longer working properly.
Instead of displaying my favorite applications on the bottom dock, it only
displays the "applications" icon. Running applications are also not displayed.
I
Yes, issue is still here. The text field is not editable and blank (empty value) -- Cheers, Aleksei
Applied, thank you for the patch!
--
Ricardo
This was fixed in Guix commit fd22921490f40044d58be8ddc3b38b8be12188a6
(September 10, 2021). See:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=50419
-Philip
Wow, you were able to reproduce. I feared that this would just be lost
to the sands, but apparently not. Nicely done!!! :-D
Oskar Berndal schreef op wo 05-01-2022 om 16:19 [+0100]:
> 179:23 2 (update-build #< building: () downloadin…> …)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure
Oskar Berndal schreef op wo 05-01-2022 om 16:19 [+0100]:
I tried running `guix pull` with the `--debug=2` flag. However, it led
a backtrace, that I include at the bottom. I tried the command twice
with the same backtrace, and then I tried without the debug flag,
simply running `guix pull`. This
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 09:33:56PM +, John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU
Guix wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syncthing-gtk has an option to enable autostart, which it does by creating
> the .desktop file in ~/.config/autostart However, this has the wrong exec
> line, getting the -real script
Calcium,
Thanks for the report!
In future, please submit separate issues separately, it helps keep
discussion, er, separate. It's easier to merge issues than to
split them.
Can't (specification->package "package@version:output")
Short answer: it is not intended to work. Use
Same problem still present as of start of 2022. Virt-manager can't connect to
libvirt service
...
(users ...
(supplementary-groups '("kvm" ...)
...)
(services ...
(service libvirt-service-type (libvirt-configuartion (unix-sock-group
"kvm")))
...)
...
I'm not the OP, but that QTWEBENGINE_CHROMIUM_FLAGS trick works for me.
The syntaxe to specify a package version and desired output
only works on guix install package@version:output
guix remove package@version:output doesn't works
guix remove package@version doesn't works
(specification->package "package@version") works
(specification->package "package:output")
Dear all,
after updating my system today nextcloud client segfaults. No helpful error
message is output.
The call of
#+begin_src sh
nextcloud --logdebug --logfile -
#+end_src
after removing all configuration of nextcloud produces the following output
#+begin_example
2022-01-05
I tried running `guix pull` with the `--debug=2` flag. However, it led
a backtrace, that I include at the bottom. I tried the command twice
with the same backtrace, and then I tried without the debug flag,
simply running `guix pull`. This worked without error. Trying to run
with the debug flag
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:24:25PM +0100, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> TL;DR: you have to add the packages gst-plugins-good and gst-plugins-bad if
> you want WebKit-based browsers to work in Guix. Otherwise WebKit complains
> about lack of WebVTT handling on many Web sites and just gives up. Adding
>
Hello again,
I should have sent this here directly, but I just submitted a patch for this
issue. I opted to just use a plain exec line of "syncthing-gtk". Please see
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53036
As we had discussed, it is not perfect, but it will work and won't break on
Am 05/01/2022 um 08:41 schrieb zimoun:
Since the last message was from 2018 and, to my knowledge*, nothing
related was reported recently, I am closing.
For information, here's a lengthy discussion of WebKit crashes in the
Nyxt browser when built under Guix:
NOTE: The patch does not apply to our qtwebengine source.
* gnu/packages/patches/qtwebengine-fix-text-rendering.patch: New file.
* gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
* gnu/packages/qt.scm (qtwebengine)[source]: Use it.
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
Hi,
Carl Dong schreef op wo 05-01-2022 om 12:40 [-0500]:
> Simon, Maxime, Danny,
>
> Thanks for CCing me on this message! The rationale for bundling
> leveldb in Bitcoin Core goes a bit beyond convenience, it is several
> things:
>
> 1. The original reason for sub-treeing is that Bitcoin Core
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 02:08:08PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 07:04:57PM +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> > Alternatively, to fix the issues with missing text, backporting this
> > patch should suffice:
> >
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 07:04:57PM +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> Alternatively, to fix the issues with missing text, backporting this
> patch should suffice:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtwebengine-chromium/+/374232
I'm testing this now.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 09:50:57PM +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you try whether:
>
> export QTWEBENGINE_CHROMIUM_FLAGS="--disable-seccomp-filter-sandbox"
>
> before starting Anki fixes this? If so, this is probably the same issue
> as https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52672
Yes,
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 04:19:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On commit 0d9d151424ab5823e441f056237819277b8aa072, the test
> tests/guix-pack-relocatable fails on Debian due to a failure to build
> a profile, because of a profile collision involving propagation of
> numpy:
Fixed by commit
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:05:58AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > + guix pack -RR python-numpy python-scipy --no-grafts -n
> > guix pack: error: profile contains conflicting entries for python-numpy
> > guix pack: error: first entry: python-numpy@1.21.3
> >
Simon, Maxime, Danny,
Thanks for CCing me on this message! The rationale for bundling leveldb in
Bitcoin Core goes a bit beyond convenience, it is several things:
1. The original reason for sub-treeing is that Bitcoin Core used to maintain
its own version of leveldb with its own fixes here:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:58 AM Chris Marusich wrote:
>
>
> > It would be great to get this upstreamed soon so I can start guix
> > pulling master. I think the guix commit and revision in
> > package-management.scm will also need to be bumped after applying this
> > fix.
>
> It shouldn't be
Hi Chris,
Chris Marusich writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Hi Aiko and Leo,
>
> Aiko Kyle writes:
>
>> It would be great to get this upstreamed soon so I can start guix
>> pulling master. I think the guix commit and revision in
>> package-management.scm will also need to be bumped
zimoun schreef op wo 05-01-2022 om 00:09 [+0100]:
> Hi Maxime.
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 06:28, Maxime Devos wrote:
> > zimoun schreef op vr 26-11-2021 om 02:38 [+0100]:
> > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 17:20, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > > > zimoun skribis:
> > > > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 at 09:33,
Hi Aiko and Leo,
Aiko Kyle writes:
> It would be great to get this upstreamed soon so I can start guix
> pulling master. I think the guix commit and revision in
> package-management.scm will also need to be bumped after applying this
> fix.
It shouldn't be necessary to update the guix commit
Hi Maxime,
On Wed, 05 Jan 2022 at 10:39, Maxime Devos wrote:
>> The package bitcore-core still provides ’leveldb’:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> and I am not sure to get what is the issue. Some explanations?
>
> The issue is that bitcoin-core bundles leveldb (which you have shown
> is still the case),
zimoun schreef op vr 03-12-2021 om 11:29 [+0100]:
> Hi,
>
> This old bug#34170 [1] provides only the ’Subject’ as elements.
> The package bitcore-core still provides ’leveldb’:
>
> [...]
>
> and I am not sure to get what is the issue. Some explanations?
The issue is that bitcoin-core bundles
>From e12c75a2c4a6430a15511d1e8aba77cde90042f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: raid5atemyhomework
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:19:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: zfs: Update to 2.1.2.
* gnu/packages/file-systems.scm (zfs): Update to 2.1.2.
---
gnu/packages/file-systems.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
36 matches
Mail list logo
