bug#63551: (no subject)

2023-11-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, Guix now has cpp-mustanche 5.0 so I think we can close that bug. Denis. pgpwNDA_3cqCb.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#66986: ifdtool: Firmwares with missing source code present in source code

2023-11-07 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I found the following firmwares with missing source code inside ifdtool source code: src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f12/Proc/GNB/Nb/Family/LN/F12NbSmuFirmware.h src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f14/Proc/GNB/Nb/Family/0x14/F14NbSmuFirmware.h If there is a mechanism to produce modified source code releases,

bug#66866: aarch64 system cross compilation + pinebook pro image broken?

2023-10-31 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
stem configuration: > ;;; Copyright © 2023 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli. SPDX-License-Identifier: > GPL-3.0+ (use-modules (gnu bootloader) >(gnu bootloader u-boot) >(gnu system file-systems) >(gnu packages linux) >(guix gexp)) &

bug#60558: (no subject)

2023-10-05 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, When testing again with x86_64 Guix and Parabola it works fine now. Denis. pgpnRjdwFIn_d.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#66140: ghc-memory not maintained anymore

2023-09-21 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, The ghc-memory package uses the https://github.com/vincenthz/hs-memory git repository. Days ago[1] that repository was "archived" / made read-only, so is is not maintained anymore. The bad news is that ghc-memory package is used directly or indirectly by about 1400 packages. It only

bug#64966: Rockpro64 SBC not booting anymore after "gnu: shepherd@0.10: Use guile-fibers 1.3.1."

2023-09-13 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi again, For some reasons I didn't receive your last mail. In the machine definition I have (system "aarch64-linux"). I've now also added -s aarch64-linux as well just to be safe. As for the patch, it is now in Guix (4dd33fc628 gnu: shepherd: Switch back to Fibers 1.1 on Arm machines.), and

bug#65917: aarch64 system broken since "gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.4.8."

2023-09-13 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
u-revision, linux-libre-pristine-source, > linux-libre-source, linux-libre, linux-libre-with-bpf): Update to > linux-libre 6.4. > > gnu/packages/linux.scm | 16 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Denis. ;;; Copyright © Guix documentation authors ;;

bug#64569: [bug #64569] Document how GNU Boot deblobs coreboot

2023-08-31 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, > It would be good that our documentation explains how GNU Boot deblobs > coreboot for each board and how users can remove new blobs if they > found some (it would help people to create patches for us, knowing > where blobs are identified) Having blob specific documentation not in the code

bug#64966: Rockpro64 SBC not booting anymore after "gnu: shepherd@0.10: Use guile-fibers 1.3.1."

2023-08-25 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:00:26 +0200 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Denis, Hi, [...] > How about this patch: I've some issue testing the patch. With guix 1c916c167b7eb1f2f8af2cf621aa1512b00b1033 ("gnu: Add thunarx-python.") I've the following: > LD [M] net/nsh/nsh.ko > LD [M] net/qrtr/qrtr.ko

bug#64981: GTK4 applications broken (missing libGLESv2)

2023-08-10 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
fff4bb8306 in ?? () >from > /gnu/store/nb40pwd37v6i1g4b1fq4l6q4h9px3asr-glib-2.72.3/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #33 0x74bbe689 in g_signal_emit_valist () > from > /gnu/store/nb40pwd37v6i1g4b1fq4l6q4h9px3asr-glib-2.72.3/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #34 0x74bbebb2 in g_

bug#64966: Rockpro64 SBC not booting anymore after "gnu: shepherd@0.10: Use guile-fibers 1.3.1."

2023-07-30 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, With the commit right before c219c22cbd[1], my rockpro64 (ARM 64bit SBC) boots fine and I get a login prompt both on the attached display and serial port. With c219c22cbd[1] instead it blocks here (see the attached boot.log file for the full boot log): > [ 33.762050] avdd: disabling I've

bug#63551: cpp-mustache-4.1 build fails

2023-05-17 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Wed, 17 May 2023 12:44:58 +0200 Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > Since commit 4ed8c0b is setting version to 5.0.0 and that version > works (does it?), I'd go for an "update to 5.0.0" patch It at least builds fine. Thanks a lot for the advises. Denis. pgp1KzGnhigyb.pgp Description: OpenPGP

bug#62784: drascula, lure, lure-de, lure-es, lure-fr, lure-it, sky: non-commercial license

2023-04-11 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I also forgot the following games (same license clause): queen, queen-de, queen-fr, queen-it. Denis. pgpmIFPgb3_Hg.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#62784: drascula, lure, lure-de, lure-es, lure-fr, lure-it, sky: non-commercial license

2023-04-11 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, The license of all these packages have that inside: > 3) You may not charge a fee for the game itself. This includes > reselling the game as an individual item. And the FSDG has that: > Non-functional Data > --- > Data that isn't functional, that doesn't do a practical job,

bug#61628: Graphical installer: network check not working if date is wrong

2023-02-19 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, With an old date, the network isn't detected in the graphical installer. I'm unsure if it's related to bug 35630[1] or not though. Running date by hand to set an approximate date and retrying to detect the network makes it work. References: --- [1]https://issues.guix.gnu.org/35630

bug#61455: i686: go-gopkg-in-yaml-v3 build failed.

2023-02-12 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, go-gopkg-in-yaml-v3 is a dependency of docker and it fails to build on i686. Here's my guix revision: > $ guix describe > Generation 60 Feb 10 2023 01:09:07(current) > guix 07f19ef > repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git > branch: master > commit:

bug#51505: Request for official docker image on dockerhub

2023-02-12 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, If the idea is to be able to use a Guix docker image, as I understand dockerhub is not strictly required. For instance Fedora has its own docker registry[1] that works out of the box with docker pull. More generally to download an image one can just run: 'docker pull /'. As I understand that

bug#61206: fakeroot 1.30.1 doesn't build from x86_64 doing qemu-binfmt for armhf-linux breaking build of arm-related images

2023-02-09 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've the same issue when building for i686 from an x86_64 computer with the following commands: > guix build -s i686-linux fakeroot The log is in zdjf6dkagsmlrrimm6nsz8p3xkxpx3-fakeroot-1.30.1.drv.gz (attached). And: > guix build --target=i686-linux-gnu fakeroot The log is in

bug#60558: Libvirt LXC not working?

2023-01-04 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've tried to run a Parabola installation inside libvirt LXC (inside a guix system intallation) and it gives me the following error: > Unable to complete install: 'internal error: guest failed to start: Failure > in libvirt_lxc startup: Unable to create directory /sys/fs/cgroup/unified: No

bug#60109: gnome-boxes and distributions

2022-12-25 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 15:39:58 +0100 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some more information: > > The Parabola's patch fox fixing that is probably this one: > https://git.parabola.nu/abslibre.git/tree/libre/libosinfo/libre.patch > This is because libosinfo i

bug#60290: Manual: Is guix-patc...@debbugs.gnu.org valid?

2022-12-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, If I send patches to guix-patc...@gnu.org, everything works as intended. However if I send them to guix-patc...@debbugs.gnu.org, I can wait days and I get no confirmation at all. This second address was found in the following command inside the Guix devel manual: > $ git send-email

bug#60287: arm-linux-gnueabihf: system image: kernel module not found "ahci"

2022-12-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've been trying to build a system image with the following command: > $ guix system image --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf -t raw-with-offset \ > minimal.scm And the following minimal.scm: > (use-modules (gnu) > (gnu bootloader u-boot)) > (use-service-modules networking ssh) >

bug#43685: xonotic player ID and starts reporting are broken

2022-12-21 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, As I understand the statistics should also be opt-in to be compliant with the FSDG and GDPR, and currently they will be opt-out when they start working. If you run Xonotic for the first time, after agreeing to the services TOS, that basically tell you that TOS apply to stats.xonotic.org and

bug#60109: gnome-boxes and distributions

2022-12-17 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, Here are some more information: The Parabola's patch fox fixing that is probably this one: https://git.parabola.nu/abslibre.git/tree/libre/libosinfo/libre.patch This is because libosinfo is in the dependencies of gnome-boxes. I didn't check beyound that. To reproduce the bug one need to

bug#60109: gnome-boxes and distributions

2022-12-15 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've installed gnome-boxes and I found out that it proposes to download and run many distribution installers. As it contains many non-FSDG compliant distributions, many of these distributions probably contain nonfree firmwares at least. Not all distributions are problematic though, as it

bug#17152: GNU Guix backend for PackageKit / Gnome-Software

2022-12-08 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, How does it work when Nix is installed on top of another distribution? Is there something to handle that in packagekit? Or with distributions like Ubuntu that also use snap, it is is handled transparently somehow? Or do users have to choose which package manager to use? I wonder that

bug#59196: guix pull fails on A20-OlinuXino-LIME2-eMMC

2022-11-15 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've found an idea: guix pull can pull to a precise commit: > --commit=COMMITdownload the specified "guix" channel COMMIT So maybe it works with a commit close to Guix 1.3. If that's the case we can probably bisect it to the commit that broke your guix pull. Denis.

bug#59196: guix pull fails on A20-OlinuXino-LIME2-eMMC

2022-11-14 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
I've tried to cross compile an image but I end up with this build failure: > $ zcat > /var/log/guix/drvs/fl/nrxka21fgd5hpbchzp3fyv01xyrs2v-linux-modules.drv.gz > Backtrace: 5 (primitive-load > "/gnu/store/lm7mjsdx6p16pbavv80hpf561df?") In ice-9/eval.scm: > 619:8 4 (_ #f) >626:19 3 (_ #)

bug#59196: guix pull fails on A20-OlinuXino-LIME2-eMMC

2022-11-13 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 11:48:18 +0100 Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote: > Hi Denis, > > Thanks for your answer. > > Strange thing, though… I didn't received your answer!? > I came across it by chance while checking > [bug-guix](https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix). > > > Sat, 12 Nov 2022 16:40:20

bug#59196: guix pull fails on A20-OlinuXino-LIME2-eMMC

2022-11-12 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, Does it also fails with 'guix pull -M 1 -c 1' ? Denis. pgpuM7NXz38z1.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#58783: Strange booting/reproducibility issue

2022-10-25 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
-- [1] The computer is a Thinkpad X60 with only an external display running Coreboot with SeaBIOS. [2] The boot log was captured by adding console=ttyS0,115200 to the command line arguments in grub and by capturing the messages through a serial port. Denis. build_init.sh Descri

bug#58366: Guix build fails on i686

2022-10-08 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, After a guix pull it now builds fine again. I've tested it with guix build -s i686-linux on x86_64 and guix build guix on i686. So the bug can now be closed. Denis. pgp68OhkUF2Pp.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#58147: FAAC considered nonfree by Debian and Parabola

2022-09-28 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, The faac package is considered nonfree in Debian[1] and also in Parabola because according to the Parabola blacklist faac "is a GPL'ed package, but has non free code that can't be distributed under the GPL"[2]. The path chosen by Parabola (and probably most other FSDG compliant or 100% free

bug#56900: phoronix-test-suite downloads nonfree software (+ question on collaboration with Parabola on this package)

2022-08-04 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:28:56 -0400 Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi Denis, Hi, > Would you like to try preparing a snippet patch turning the above > 'Free' into 'Proprietary' or the likes so that the Python script can > remove them? Otherwise I can look into it. Since you wrote the python script

bug#56900: phoronix-test-suite downloads nonfree software (+ question on collaboration with Parabola on this package)

2022-08-02 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, Thanks a lot for working on having a recent FSDG compliant versions of phoronix-test-suite. I've found a minor issue with phoronix-test-suite and I've a couple of questions to help synchronize between Parabola and Guix to prevent accidental installation of nonfree software. Nonfree software

bug#56223: h-client not running with a host distribution

2022-06-25 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, After having done a 'guix pull', I added h-client to a system image made with guix system image, and when running that image I could launch h-client with any of the following command lines: $ h-client $ sudo -E h-client However with Parabola i686 (also after having done a 'guix pull',

bug#54651: Guix pull failing on ARM 32bit with "Please report the COMPLETE output above by email"

2022-05-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Mon, 23 May 2022 21:08:20 +0200 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > I'll now try with the current HEAD to see if that's somehow fixed. I've a similar failure with HEAD: > \ 'check' phasebuilder for > `/gnu/store/m1iyn6y1s3ajl6v0lv5658zq2cngdpq3-ruby-stackprof-0.2.17.drv' > failed wi

bug#54651: Guix pull failing on ARM 32bit with "Please report the COMPLETE output above by email"

2022-05-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Maybe an issue is that I've 2 cores on i686 while I've 4 on armv7h. Or Maybe I didn't see what was there before (I use screen so it's not convenient to copy-paste the output). Now I have: > $ guix pull --commit=f0e9048e98f0789aa98de88984f4ee0fc9687f52 -M 1 -c 1 > Updating channel 'guix' from Git

bug#54651: Guix pull failing on ARM 32bit with "Please report the COMPLETE output above by email"

2022-05-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Mon, 23 May 2022 16:10:04 +0200 Maxime Devos wrote: > Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli schreef op ma 23-05-2022 om 15:40 [+0200]: > > Hi, > > > > I've now made some free space. So we have: > > - 1GiB of RAM and 16GiB of swap: > >   > # c

bug#54651: Guix pull failing on ARM 32bit with "Please report the COMPLETE output above by email"

2022-05-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've now made some free space. So we have: - 1GiB of RAM and 16GiB of swap: > # cat /proc/swaps > FilenameTypeSizeUsed Priority > /dev/mmcblk0p1 partition 1677721216384 -2 -

bug#54651: Guix pull failing on ARM 32bit with "Please report the COMPLETE output above by email"

2022-05-18 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, Now it fails with the following error: > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... > 0.0% > /Backtrace: > > \ > 16 (primitive-load >

bug#54728: [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: valgrind: fix ld.so symbols not found

2022-05-06 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, Did you manage to receive the patches, or were they lost somehow[1]? At least I see them on https://issues.guix.gnu.org/54728 . References: --- [1]Personally for some reason I didn't receive a copy of the patches I sent through git-send-email in my mail. Denis.

bug#54728: [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: valgrind: fix ld.so symbols not found

2022-04-26 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
For some reasons I didn't receive a copy of the cover letter patch I sent with git-send-email yet, so I can't reply to the cover letter, so I'm replying to the patch instead. In any case the patches and the cover letter are in the bug[1] report and so as promised here's the libsamsung-ipc.scm I

bug#54728: [PATCH v2 1/2] gnu: valgrind: impots: sort imports alphabetically

2022-04-25 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
* gnu/packages/valgrind.scm: sort imports alphabetically Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- gnu/packages/valgrind.scm | 9 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/valgrind.scm b/gnu/packages/valgrind.scm index 1cdc0f3b71..6648f17dfa 100644

bug#54728: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: valgrind: fix ld.so symbols not found

2022-04-25 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've now managed to make a proper patch. I've used 'v2' for more clarity. I'll send the files used to test them in a subsequent mails. As for the tests, I've done them in Guix system, once installed valgrind works fine: > $ make check > valgrind -v --leak-check=full ./main > ==20324==

bug#54728: [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: valgrind: fix ld.so symbols not found

2022-04-25 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
-0,0 +1,100 @@ +From a7f17b57a94e9cde6d7fa96ac86be5c4fc4f9211 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli +Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 22:20:50 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] valgrind: fix default debuginfo path + +Description: Workaround for missing symbol in Guix's ld.so. The + correct fix (not stripping all the ld.so s

bug#54728: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: valgrind: fix ld.so symbols not found

2022-04-25 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:21:33 +0200 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello! Hi, [...] > I find this patch-as-code snippet rather difficult to follow; it might > also break easily if minor things change in those C files. > > How about making it an actual patch? In the patch, you’d have > placeholders

bug#54728: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: valgrind: fix ld.so symbols not found

2022-04-14 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
* gnu/packages/valgrind.scm (valgrind/interactive)[native-inputs]: Add libc:debug [arguments]: Add patch-default-debuginfo-path phase * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (glibc-final): Export variable. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- gnu/packages/commencement.scm | 2 +- gnu/packages

bug#54728: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: valgrind: impots: sort imports alphabetically

2022-04-14 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
* gnu/packages/valgrind.scm: sort imports alphabetically Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- gnu/packages/valgrind.scm | 9 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/valgrind.scm b/gnu/packages/valgrind.scm index 1cdc0f3b71..6648f17dfa 100644

bug#54728: Valgrind not working out of the box due to stripped ld.so

2022-04-14 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 18:40:08 +0200 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, Hi, > Unfortunately, until that branch is merge (most likely a few months > from now), we’ll have to use the workaround you mentioned. > > Alternatively, maybe we could temporarily patch the ‘valgrind’ package > such that it has

bug#54651: Guix pull failing on ARM 32bit with "Please report the COMPLETE output above by email"

2022-04-05 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I forgot to mention that it happened right after the installation of Guix on top of Parabola with the guix installer script. (I didn't manage to do a guix pull before). I'll keep retrying from time to time and report if it's fixed. Denis. pgpRdLh5okXYA.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital

bug#54728: Valgrind not working out of the box due to stripped ld.so

2022-04-05 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, The fact that Valgrind doesn't work out of the box seems to already be known[1] but I didn't find any bugreports on it. The workaround[1] mentioned is extremely useful but it's far from ideal. For instance if you have a software that uses Valgrind in its tests (for instance in 'make check')

bug#54651: Guix pull failing on ARM 32bit with "Please report the COMPLETE output above by email"

2022-03-31 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, Here's the failing command output: # guix pull Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to dda555f (17,297 new commits)... Building from this channel: guix

bug#42379: uninstaller

2022-03-30 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, There are valid use cases for uninstalling Guix: - On a Trisquel VM I use Guix to add matterbridge to it with guix pack. Once the tarball is done with guix pack I remove Guix and install the pack to limit the attack surface. To do the updates I install Guix back and re-do a tarball. -

bug#53462: Guile 2.0.14: check fails on i686

2022-01-22 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, With Guix system i686, at the following commit: > cadcbbaf65 gnu: r-bigmelon: Add r-knitr. guile 2.0.14 fails tests. I've attached the log. I'm unsure what to do here as it's Guile 2.0.14 and on Guile website I only see Guile 3.0.7 and guile 2.2.7[1], and Guile 2.0.14 s from 2017[2].

bug#52727: When logged as user, GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH points to the system cache instead of the user cache

2021-12-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
stream but not in an fdm release yet). Right now I can't test without fdm-git because when doing guix system reconfigure, it tries to build guix but its tests fails. I'll bugreport about that. Denis. ;; Copyright (C) 2021 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli ;; ;; This program is free software: you can

bug#52727: When logged as user, GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH points to the system cache instead of the user cache

2021-12-21 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
olution to that be to correctly export GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH in ~/.guix-profile/etc/profile like it is done in the patch I attached (with an extra small modification in the commit message to mention the bug report)? Other commits fixing bugs in that same profile mentioned bug reports, so I ass

bug#36786: Warn of AMD GPUs unusable with Guix System

2021-12-07 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Would it be better to find a way to fix these issue rather than warn people about it? They look realatively easy to fix. For the Radeon / AMDGPU drivers to work, you need: - A patch need to be upstreamed in linux-libre for the GPU family to make the driver load. That patch needs to be tested on

bug#51352: Matterbridge contained a lot of vendored code

2021-10-23 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, When I sent the patch adding matterbridge to Guix, I only notified that I didn't know if it contained vendored code or not at the last moment (after the patch was sent, during the discussion about it, and before it was merged). The issue is that I didn't know go at all and more specifically

bug#51259: Cannot build Guix from source (error messages about the translations)

2021-10-20 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:52:54 -0400 Julien Lepiller wrote: > You might be running with modified files, or the container is doing > something unexpected. Can you try again from a clean checkout, or > after cleaning with "git clean -fdx"? This should put the repo back > to the last commit, and

bug#51259: Cannot build Guix from source (error messages about the translations)

2021-10-20 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I'm on i686, and I've tried all the approaches mentioned: - export LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 - rm doc/contributing.*.texi - the patch in doc/local.mk on top of the following commit: 19d3cfec72 gnu: python-arrow: Move python-pytz to native-inputs. I tried building Guix with both: - guix environment

bug#49801: Guix time machine provenance/manifest reproducibility issue?

2021-09-02 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:10:22 +0200 zimoun wrote: > Hi Denis, > > Thanks for the investigation and the attempt. > > Well, I miss if it works or not... It doesn't work. The issue was that if you build a tarball with guix pack, without guix time-machine, you can't reproduce it with

bug#49801: Guix time machine provenance/manifest reproducibility issue?

2021-09-01 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi again. With and without this patch: > diff --git a/guix/scripts/pull.scm b/guix/scripts/pull.scm > index fb8ce50fa7..af1cf77f07 100644 > --- a/guix/scripts/pull.scm > +++ b/guix/scripts/pull.scm > @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ Use '~/.config/guix/channels.scm' instead.")) > (cons (match

bug#49913: python-networkx test failing

2021-08-08 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 13:54:10 +0300 Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 07:03:11PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > networkx/algorithms/shortest_paths/tests/test_weighted.py:29: > > > > AssertionError === 1 failed, 3517 passed, 182 skipped > > > > in 246.61s

bug#49913: python-networkx test failing

2021-08-06 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, when trying to install fdroidserver, I have the following build failure in the tests with python-networkx: > building > /gnu/store/64a09gnkl01k6vcwrn1cvv1v8nm88xhb-python-networkx-2.5.1.drv... > 100% 'check' > [###]builder > for >

bug#49801: Guix time machine provenance/manifest reproducibility issue?

2021-07-31 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've been trying to reproduce a tarball (sz1lkq3ryr5iv6amy6f3d2pziks27g28-tarball-pack.tar.xz) that I generated with guix pack on guix master the 28 January 2021. To build it, in January, I used the following commands: > guix pull > guix pack \ > --compression=xz \ >

bug#45517: Failed boot on arm32 with u-boot due to missing requirements with the distro boot protocol

2021-01-01 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:35:48 +0100 Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > The default image type creates an EFI partition which is not desirable > here. You should try again running this instead: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > guix system disk-image -t arm32-raw

bug#45519: MLO failed to load u-boot.img on beaglebone black(AM335x)

2020-12-30 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
boot with FS mode. It is difficult to > support this unless ROM passes some information on the bootmode. We are using this patch in Parabola. I'll try to test it too in Guix though I can often take quite some time to manage to test things with Guix when patching Guix itself. References: --

bug#45519: MLO failed to load u-boot.img on beaglebone black(AM335x)

2020-12-30 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 05:33:55 +0100 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: In addition I forgot that the patch I talked about was for omap3 and not for AM335x. Denis. pgpf5IWLeeep6.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#45517: Failed boot on arm32 with u-boot due to missing requirements with the distro boot protocol

2020-12-30 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I've generated an image for the Lime2 with this (lime2.scm) file: > ;; Based on Guix's beaglebone-black.tmpl > (use-modules (gnu) (gnu bootloader u-boot)) > (use-package-modules bootloaders) > (operating-system > (host-name "lime2") > (timezone "Europe/Paris") > (locale "en_US.utf8") >

bug#45519: MLO failed to load u-boot.img on beaglebone black(AM335x)

2020-12-30 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 04:47:25 +0100 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > > "/libexec/MLO")) (u-boot (string-append bootloader > > "/libexec/u-boot.img"))) (write-file-on-device mlo (* 256 512) > > image (* 256 512)) > >

bug#42964: Potential FSDG issue with debootstrap scripts

2020-08-20 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, I found a potential issue with the debootstrap package and the Guix blog. The Free System Distribution Guidelines states that: > A free system distribution must not steer users towards obtaining any > nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so. > The system should have

bug#40626: Poor performance on low-end ARMv7 devices

2020-07-13 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:34:15 +0200 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli skribis: > > > Many ARM Single Board Computers are commonly used with microSD for > > storage, and some microSD cards are extremely slow (and sometimes > > unreliable whe

bug#40626: Poor performance on low-end ARMv7 devices

2020-07-02 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, Many ARM Single Board Computers are commonly used with microSD for storage, and some microSD cards are extremely slow (and sometimes unreliable when they are old). Could the performance issues be related to storage device I/Os? Denis. pgpevYyzP4lp9.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital

bug#42161: Confusing '' error message

2020-07-02 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:48:26 +0200 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello, Hi, > If you’re having troubles building your system, I’d try building with > ‘-v3’ (verbose mode) for example, or ‘--on-error=debug’ if the problem > is in your ‘system.scm’ file. Here's with -v3 > # guix system -v3

bug#42161: Confusing '' error message

2020-07-01 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Hi, When doing guix system system.scm /path/to/empty/directory, I have the following error message: > # guix system --verbosity=99 --debug=99 --no-bootloader init > system.scm /srv/distros/guix/ guile: warning: failed to install locale > acquiring global GC lock `/var/guix/gc.lock' > acquiring