bug#65456: [PATCH v3] self: Build guix/ and gnu/packages/ directories in 26 steps.

Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hi! > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > Hi! > >> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen skribis: >> [..] >> In fact, guix/*.go is entirely missing, it seems: > > Right...that makes sense now that I look at the code again. > > Wait...I probably even experienced this breakage after running

bug#65461: Cannot compile any Rust projects

Hello Brian, On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:22:07 +0800, brian wrote: > > I'd like to propose that the ‘out’ output of gcc-toolchain include the > stub rt, pthread, and dl stub static libraries. This problem comes up on > a very regular basis, and I can think of no reason not to have the > compatibility

bug#64586: Emacs-Packages should contain native-compiled files

Hi, Am Mittwoch, dem 23.08.2023 um 17:37 +0200 schrieb Simon Tournier: > Hi, > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 21:36, Liliana Marie Prikler > wrote: > > > You are correct, but unlike other language ecosystems (e.g. Python > > or Common Lisp), we don't have a convenient "package-with-emacs" as > > of

bug#65461: Cannot compile any Rust projects

I'd like to propose that the ‘out’ output of gcc-toolchain include the stub rt, pthread, and dl stub static libraries. This problem comes up on a very regular basis, and I can think of no reason not to have the compatibility shims made available. They contain no code, as they only exist to

bug#65219: OpenFOAM is not reproducible

Hi, On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 09:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > /share/OpenFOAM/build/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/applications/solvers/heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionFoam/chtMultiRegionTwoPhaseEulerFoam/chtMultiRegionTwoPhaseEulerFoam.C.dep > >

bug#64999: Acknowledgement (emacs-next: emacs-29.1 fails to native-compile libraries, giving a runtime error that ctri.o and other files can't be found)

Hi, On Tue, 01 Aug 2023 at 17:37, Adam Porter wrote: > I don't know enough about Guix to understand why using "guix install" > with the package transformation option caused the runtime problem with > gcc, but everything does seem to work with the updated definition. See Josselin’s

bug#56365: Emacs crash when built with Guix

Hi, On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 at 01:01, Ryan Prior wrote: > I've been getting a persistent crash when I select text in Emacs this > past couple days. I'll post the stacktrace below. This bug seems related to #58606 [1], no? And a similar bug is tracked upstream with [2]. Could you confirm it is

bug#64586: Emacs-Packages should contain native-compiled files

Hi, On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 21:36, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > You are correct, but unlike other language ecosystems (e.g. Python or > Common Lisp), we don't have a convenient "package-with-emacs" as of > yet. This is basically step 3 of > of which only

bug#65208: etc/teams.scm regexp

Hi, On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 09:34, Greg Hogan wrote: > I am seeing unapplied "#" in some team scopes when running > `./etc/teams.scm list-teams`. This is done by . I do not know what it had never been merged. Probably because the revamp for a v3 was more

bug#64753: compute-guix-derivation

Hi, On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 23:25, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > It seems that the gut of the problem is that ci.guix.gnu.org was either > unreachable or very slow. Well, #64659 [1] seems another similar bug report. And I often hit transient failures with substitutions. How could we improve the

bug#65460: ghc/ghci are broken

> > Thanks! Adding gcc-toolchain to the profile fixed it, but shouldn't this > > be automatically brought in by `guix install ghc`? This does still feels > > like a bug to me, shouldn't gcc-toolchain be a part of ghcs native-inputs? native-inputs are for buildtime inputs and here ghc needs a c

bug#65460: ghc/ghci are broken

Jonas via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > Thanks! Adding gcc-toolchain to the profile fixed it, but shouldn't this > be automatically brought in by `guix install ghc`? This does still feels > like a bug to me, shouldn't gcc-toolchain be a part of ghcs native-inputs? > > sanoj@deimos

bug#65474: Reproducing a texlive bug

Hello, I can confirm that the same problem presents itself on guix 9896b37 Repository-URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git Branch: master Commit: 9896b37ac53e9b0504de55dd5ba4bfa2c241a7ed of August 17. A likely culprit is commit 3481a5cb37cacbb54f74a2b1fa52ffc5c972b09f

bug#65127: Python-pytorch slow

>lun. 07 août 2023 at 16:50, Cayetano Santos wrote: > Hi guix, > > I just noticed that the following line (latest guix, as for today) > > guix shell -C --emulate-fhs --network python python-pytorch > python-torchvision -- python3 quickstart_tutorial.py > > with > > >

bug#65474: Bug in python-notebook

Hi guix, I have just updated by local copy of guix with guix pull At this point, a simple guix pack python-notebook gives me an error message related to a failed compilation in /gnu/store/8wf5h68zm5lf9n157qbwdfmqz8dfpczq-texlive-font-maps.drv The compilation journal

bug#65472: texlive split packages are missing isodate.sty, wallpaper.sty, and dashrule.sty

Hi, after switching to split texlive packages (via texlive-scheme-medium), my documents fail to compile. I cannot find split packages for isodate.sty, wallpaper.sty, and dashrule.sty Minimal reproduction: --- file: test.tex --- \documentclass{memoir} \usepackage[iso,german]{isodate}

bug#65390: bug#65395: [PATCH] gnu: naev: Fix build.

iyzs...@envs.net writes: > From: 宋文武 > > * gnu/packages/games.scm (naev)[inputs]: Don't use sdl-union. > Remove sdl2-mixer. Pushed now, closing.

bug#65460: ghc/ghci are broken

Thanks! Adding gcc-toolchain to the profile fixed it, but shouldn't this be automatically brought in by `guix install ghc`? This does still feels like a bug to me, shouldn't gcc-toolchain be a part of ghcs native-inputs? sanoj@deimos ~/builds/hs-hello$ guix shell --container ghc -- ghc hello.hs

bug#65456: [PATCH v4] self: Build directories in chunks of max 25 files at a time.

Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hi! > Ludovic Courtès writes: >> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen skribis: >> [..] > it still has the "gnu/packages" directory name hardcoded here. (I even > believe this was kind-of intentional, meaning not to split-up builds of > other directories...). The result is, of

bug#65419: [Shepherd] Non-reponding service control fiber

Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] > The conclusion seems to be that the control fiber of the ‘root’ service > is not responding: it is blocked on a get/put? did it exit? > > Unfortunately we don’t have data from the logs that would give clues as > to what went wrong. I've had a look at

bug#65463: Herd `fport_write: Broken pipe` error when running `guix home reconfigure`

Hi Guix, I think this has been happening for quite a long time, but I never paid attention to it, for everything seemed to be running just fine. When I run `guix home reconfigure`, it completes with the following message: ``` # […] Finished updating symlinks. SSLoading

bug#65456: [PATCH v3] self: Build guix/ and gnu/packages/ directories in 26 steps.

Ludovic Courtès writes: Hi! > Janneke Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >> Similar to the Makefile.am change, this breaks-up packages into 26 chunks >> when building on 32bit. Also force garbage collection. >> >> * guix/self.scm (compiled-modules)[process-directory/32bit]: New inner >> define. >> Use