Hi Danny,
On +2020-10-17 12:20:11 +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> How do I debug this?
>
> $ guix-core-updates/guix/pre-inst-env guix environment -s armhf-linux --pure
> grep
>
> needs grep (it's in the implicit native inputs), and that grep has a test
> failure.
What if the test failure
Hi,
On +2023-10-09 20:33:38 +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 09.10.2023 um 14:21 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> >
> > > [...]
> > > If you need me to reduce it to four letters, yes, LGTM.
> >
> > Explicit is better than
Hello,
On +2022-05-21 00:19:06 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>
> > The installer built from:
> >
> > Generation 214 May 02 2022 21:44:14(current)
> > guix 6b588da
> > repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
> > branch: master
> >
Hi,
On +2022-07-07 23:45:35 -0300, André Batista wrote:
> qui 07 jul 2022 às 18:35:42 (1657229742), nan...@riseup.net enviou:
> > I think this may be actually a bug upstream. (...)
>
> I mean, we could change the submodule-update fetch-options to allow
> for repository initialization when it's
On +2022-06-27 12:17:08 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Chris Marusich skribis:
>
> > It turns out that it is probably not OK to rely on shell redirection in
> > this case, after all. For example, "dash does not support multi-digit
> > file descriptors":
> >
> >
Hi,
On +2022-07-02 20:26:40 +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> Guillaume Le Vaillant writes:
>
> > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> > Christopher Baines skribis:
> >
> >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> >> writes:
> >>
> >>> On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie
Hi Chris,
Did you observe this behaviour inside a git repo directory?
I wonder if this git security thing could be relevant:
https://lwn.net/Articles/892755/
It makes also me wonder about readline completion stuff
possibly interacting. Isn't that implemented with readline?
I have had some
Hi,
tl;dr: I hope there will be a security team discussing
whether/how this kind of privileged execution interval
could be exploited, and how to prevent such.
E.g., could something that stealthily gets put in a finalizer
for some innocent object be waiting to
Hi Ludo,
On +2022-07-18 11:29:55 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
> > Hi Ludovic,
> >
> > Ludovic Courtès writes:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> "Raghav Gururajan" skribis:
> >>
> Does simply adding ‘hicolor-icon-theme’ to ‘inputs’ fix the issue?
> >>>
> >>>
Hi,
On +2022-07-23 22:53:59 +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 23.07.2022 um 21:56 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> > On 23-07-2022 17:11, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> >
> > > + (revision "2022.05.23")) ; Use a date rather than a
> > > number
> >
> > This is a
Hi,
On +2022-07-27 14:31:32 -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > Maxim Cournoyer 写道：
> >> I'd suggest we revisit 8cb1a49a3998c39f315a4199b7d4a121a6d66449 to
> >> use
> >> 'unspecified (the symbol) instead of *unspecified*, which *can* be
On +2022-06-25 19:40:48 +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Chris Marusich schreef op za 25-06-2022 om 09:52 [-0700]:
> > Yes, I agree those are good reasons to avoid a temporary file if we
> > can.
> > To that end, do you know if we can somehow force Guile to use a
> > specific
> > file descriptor for
Hi,
On +2022-08-02 09:31:14 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
> > Ludovic Courtès writes:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> >>
> >>> Since commit 8cb1a49a3998c39f315a4199b7d4a121a6d66449, the
> >>> define-configuration machinery in (gnu
-cut here---start->8---
$ mktemp -d /tmp/joshclips.XX.d
/tmp/joshclips.rinY4L.d
$ ls -ltra /tmp/joshclips.rinY4L.d/
total 8
drwxrwxrwt 16 root root 4096 Oct 26 12:59 ..
drwx-- 2 bokr bokr 4096 Oct 26 12:59 .
--8<---cut here---end-
gdm activation script runs).
>
> I'll follow-up with a patch that puts /var/lib/gdm on a tmpfs. This
> should avoid many pitfalls people have had.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Maxim
>
>
>
PS. WDYT..
(If there isn't a tool already available that'd make it easy to use
the one-lin
Hi Ludo, Simon, et interested ..
On +2022-10-04 12:11:52 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Matthieu Haefele skribis:
>
> > Le 03/10/2022 à 16:03, Ludovic Courtès a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
> >> You should be able to get around it by first building things locally:
> >>
> >>guix build
Hi Joshua,
On +2022-08-03 21:54:12 -0400, Joshua Branson via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
>
> wterm is said to be a simple terminal for wayland:
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC shell :results: raw
> guix show wterm | recsel -p synopsis
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+RESULTS:
> : synopsis: Terminal emulator for
Hi,
tl;dr:
IMO this whole language neutering project, whose goal UIAM is
purportedly to exclude exclusion, is self-contradictory.
I.e., it excludes those who are used to natural language as they
have learned it (including words to charm or insult or play with),
and are not distracted by gender
Hi Tobias,
On +2022-07-31 01:46:07 +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU
Guix wrote:
> After the server migration, the ‘Build outputs’ links on pages like [0]
> return 502.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R
>
> [0]: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1123838/details
Works for me now,
Hi Liliana,
On +2022-08-08 12:45:10 +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.08.2022 um 23:29 + schrieb Cairn:
> > "HandleLidSwitchExternalPower= is completely ignored by default (for
> > backwards compatibility)"[1]
> >
> > I noticed (with help in IRC) that my laptop wasn't
Hi,
On +2022-08-04 21:58:16 +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU
Guix wrote:
> Hi Liliana,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler 写道：
> > I'm not saying either option is worse than the other
>
> I see; thanks for the clarification.
>
> Then I *will* say that transparently upgrading to a
Hi "(" aka paren :)
On +2022-07-21 16:03:19 +0100, paren--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
[ ... ]
>
> -- (
>
Are you hoping for some effect on a pre-rfc2822 parser??
Just curious :)
--
Regards,
Bengt Richter
Hi zimoun,
On +2022-11-27 13:22:22 +0100, zimoun wrote:
[...]
>
> This file lives in the store. Hum, I am surprised that a power shutdown
> removed this file.
>
Are all the conditions for a clean sync
of the file system where /gnu/store is mounted guaranteed?
What is the difference between
Hi,
On +2022-11-24 12:17:01 -0300, André Batista wrote:
> Hi!
>
> qui 04 ago 2022 às 13:59:20 (1659632360), ludovic.cour...@inria.fr enviou:
> > I think we should instead report it upstream. Do you feel like doing
> > it? I guess we’d need to give them the C version of the three-line
> >
On +2023-01-23 08:51:16 +0100, zimoun wrote:
[ ... ]
>
> Julien, the patch is here:
>
> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/20221125203328.21379-1-re...@remworks.net
https://... works too, for me.
Any reason to prefer http://... ?
[ ... ]
>
> Cheers,
> simo
>
--
Regards,
Bengt Richter
es the date to create a new scratch
"boot-session" directory and updates a symbolic link to it at ~/bs
like stat -c %N ~/bs shows:
'/home/bokr/bs' -> '/home/bokr/BS/bs20230115_0753'
which is annoyingly wrong. It also makes a link to the previous ~/bs
in the new, like
'/home/bok
On +2023-03-14 12:29:11 +0100, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 13:11, Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> wrote:
>
> > I often go to guix.gnu.org to read the (excellent!) Guix manual. This
> > leads to this click pattern: guix.gnu.org -> Help -> GNU
Hi,
On +2023-03-01 12:16:56 +0100, Csepp wrote:
[...]
> How the hell would my paths affect what's in the bin folder? Like, the
> flatpak binary is literally not present in the profile, that's why it's
> not showing up in $PATH.
Could something in one of your path directories
accidentally have
Hi,
On +2023-02-06 16:54:20 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Simon Tournier writes:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > A naive question since it works when using the --no-cwd option.
> >
> > On ven., 27 janv. 2023 at 11:19, Maxim Cournoyer
> > wrote:
> >
> >> --8<---cut
On +2024-04-11 02:08:35 +0200, Rostislav Svoboda wrote:
> Do you mean the guix-install.sh script? If so then what about the
> https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#index-uninstallation_002c-of-Guix
> ?
>
>
>
It says (a bit reformatted):
On +2024-04-30 22:18:03 -0400, Richard Sent wrote:
> Hi Guix!
>
> When running guix search, relevance in synopsis and description fields
> are computed strictly by the number of matches, both as a word and as a
> subword. Ideally, if a search string matches an isolated word in a
> search, that
31 matches
Mail list logo
