Marco d'Itri writes:
> On Jul 08, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>> I don't know the history of inetutils' fork of (g)whois, is there any
>> hope in getting these code-bases merged now? Maybe enough water has
>> passed under the bridges...
> I see no reasons at this point to tie whois to inetnutils
On Jul 08, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I don't know the history of inetutils' fork of (g)whois, is there any
> hope in getting these code-bases merged now? Maybe enough water has
> passed under the bridges...
I see no reasons at this point to tie whois to inetnutils development,
since inetutils
Chris Reveles writes:
> Hello,
>
>
> I hope 2022 is already up to a good start over there. I am doing some
> research and I noticed certain TLDs such as .art and .eth are not resolving
> properly from the *whois* command, are such domains on the map to be
> supported?
Thanks for the report -- I
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 04:34:07PM -0500, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>>I hope 2022 is already up to a good start over there. I am doing
>>some research and I noticed certain TLDs such as .art and .eth are
>>not resolving properly from the whois command, are such domains on
>
Hello everyone,
Thank you very much for your attention to this matter, I wish I replied
earlier, but we are busier than normal over here.
My profile may seem fairly technical, but I am more on the management,
legal and counseling side, in case the offer on maintaining the project was
addressed
>I hope 2022 is already up to a good start over there. I am doing
>some research and I noticed certain TLDs such as .art and .eth are
>not resolving properly from the whois command, are such domains on
>the map to be supported?
>
> They are supported, but the TLD
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 05:02:05AM -0500, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>I hope 2022 is already up to a good start over there. I am doing
>some research and I noticed certain TLDs such as .art and .eth are
>not resolving properly from the whois command, are such domains on
>the map to be
On Jan 03, Chris Reveles wrote:
> I hope 2022 is already up to a good start over there. I am doing some
> research and I noticed certain TLDs such as .art and .eth are not resolving
> properly from the *whois* command, are such domains on the map to be
> supported?
The
I hope 2022 is already up to a good start over there. I am doing
some research and I noticed certain TLDs such as .art and .eth are
not resolving properly from the whois command, are such domains on
the map to be supported?
They are supported, but the TLD list needs updating. Would
Understood, thank you for your prompt response Marco.
cR
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022, 21:52 Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 03, Chris Reveles wrote:
>
> > I hope 2022 is already up to a good start over there. I am doing some
> > research and I noticed certain TLDs such as .art and .eth are not
>
On Jan 03, Chris Reveles wrote:
> I hope 2022 is already up to a good start over there. I am doing some
> research and I noticed certain TLDs such as .art and .eth are not resolving
> properly from the *whois* command, are such domains on the map to be
> supported?
The version of whois in
11 matches
Mail list logo
