Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32]

2008-03-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
no unexpected failures. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 40 41 42 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 failed

2008-03-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
10.4, and i386 Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5. What versions of autoconf and automake did you use? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: [patch] 1.5.26 do echo=echo if necessary

2008-03-08 Thread Peter O'Gorman
, the generated libtool script should already have: # An echo program that does not interpret backslashes. echo=echo Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32]

2008-03-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:40:08AM CET: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Ralf has already checked in a workaround for gcj being unable to create objects/executables. I guess I will add to that so it tests that an executable created by the compiler

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

2008-03-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:04:41AM CET: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: libtool: link: f90 -shared -Qoption ld --whole-archive ./.libs/liba1.a ./.libs/liba2.a -Qoption ld --no-whole-archive -Qoption ld

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Nelson, Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:18:42AM CET: Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: libtool: compile: gcj -g -O2 -c A3.java gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory Your gcj and automake are broken. Do you have a sane toolchain

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 08:43:15PM CET: On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Peter O'Gorman wrote: I think the test for a working GCJ should be in libtool, and unset GCJ, avoid adding the tag etc.if it is found to be nonfunctional. We would have to issue

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: libtool: link: f90 -shared -Qoption ld --whole-archive ./.libs/liba1.a ./.libs/liba2.a -Qoption ld --no-whole-archive -Qoption ld -soname -Qoption ld liba12.so.0 -o .libs/liba12.so.0.0.0 /convenience.at:211: exit code was 1, expected

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
86-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o Thank you. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Libtool detected FC as f90, but otherwise used the gcc tools. I'll look into this. Because we generally use the same archive_cmds for F77, FC as for CXX, things can get a little messed up. This fixes the most common case, gcc

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: On 6 Mar 2008, at 20:04, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: libtool: link: f90 -shared -Qoption ld --whole-archive ./.libs/liba1.a ./.libs/liba2.a -Qoption ld --no-whole-archive -Qoption ld -soname -Qoption ld liba12.so.0 -o

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
mailbox :) Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [Solaris AMD64]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
O'Gorman http://pogma.com 2008-03-07 Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG): Need to set LD. Reported by Nelson H. F. Beebe. Index: libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 === RCS file: /sources/libtool

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32]

2008-03-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Peter O'Gorman wrote: The gcj in /usr/local/bin does indeed add -liconv, thank you for confirming my suspicion. Ralf has already checked in a workaround for gcj being unable to create objects/executables. I guess I will add to that so it tests that an executable created by the compiler

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [Solaris IA-32]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
: grep 'require .*but have' stderr (exit 77) 35. am-subdir.at:33: 35. C subdir-objects (am-subdir.at:33): FAILED (am-subdir.at:78) There appears to be a problem with your automake install that is causing most of these test failures. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
variable and the access to the archives. Your gcj install is broken. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Automake::generate_makefile('Makefile.am', 'Makefile.in') called at /usr/local/bin/automake line 7834 Your gcj and automake are broken. Do you have a sane toolchain on any of your systems? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
, but somehow not add it to the rpath? What does: gcj -### -o /dev/null /dev/null show? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [Solaris AMD64]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: Hi Nelson, I admit that I don't understand the failures like this one yet. /convenience.at:265: $LIBTOOL --tag=GCJ --mode=link $GCJ $GCJFLAGS $LDFLAGS -o liba12.la liba1.la liba2.la -rpath /notexist stderr: stdout: libtool: link: gcj -shared -Wl,-z -Wl,text -Wl,-h

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Your gcj and automake are broken. Do you have a sane toolchain on any of your systems? That sounds a little harsh. I think that the LZMA complaint from automake may be because libtool requests a lzma package and it requires

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
' does not appear to do anything? I think Ralf has seen this before, if not I will look at it. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 12 17 19 38 64 failed [Mac OS X Intel]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory libtool: compile: gcj -g -O2 -c A3.java gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory So does this. I am now building gfortran, gcj etc on Mac OS X intel to make sure that things are working :) Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux Alpha]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
): FAILED (convenience.at:277) Your gcj on this system does not appear to add the runpath to libgcj when linking. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug

Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux AMD64]

2008-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: Another powerpc64 biarch problem.

2008-03-04 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Steven Munroe wrote: On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 09:39 -0600, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Steven Munroe wrote: I am trying to build a package on a OpenSuse-10.3 PowerMac G5. and I see the following: /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link /usr/bin/gcc -m64 -g -O2 -mcpu=power 4 -fno-strict-aliasing

Re: libltdl memory corruption

2008-03-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
tonight (dyld on mac os x 10.2, and shl_load on hpux10.20). Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: Another powerpc64 biarch problem.

2008-03-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
and stderr to a log, reading the log should tell you which one. Alternatively, grep for /usr/lib64/libpcre.la in /usr/lib64. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: portability of -Lrelative_directory_name

2008-02-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
that it encodes the build directory into the .la files, however, you are correct, it is a doc bug too, I will look making a patch to the docs tonight. Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http

Mac OS X 10.2.8 HEAD test failures.

2007-12-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
05,29,30,31,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,52 and 53 fail because aclocal: macro `_LT_CHECK_BUILDDIR' required but not defined Looks like _LT_CHECK_BUILDDIR is m4_defun'ed but AC_REQUIRED. Should we skip 28,46,47 and 48 if autoconf is too old, and m4_require _LT_CHECK_BUILDDIR? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com

Re: libtool fails if user has environment variable D defined

2007-08-08 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:16 -1000, Sebastian Jester wrote: We do not want portage's install root ($D) present. This is not in the official libtool release, probably from a gentoo patch. Peter ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org

Re: lt_dlsym() Doesn't Allow for a Symbol with Address of 0.

2007-07-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 18:30 +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: Hi Peter, I investigated a problem on the llvmdev mailing list where someone was trying to find the value of a symbol that has an address of 0. $ nm /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Foundation |

Re: libtool generates incorrect option for Solaris ld

2007-07-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 15:48 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: I've done a make dist on the MPFR library under Debian, and with this tarball, when I do a ./configure --enable-shared under Solaris, make fails: [...] /bin/ksh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -xtarget=native -xarch=v9 -xO4

Re: dlfcn.h (libtool 1.5.23b)

2007-06-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 16:04 -0600, deckrider wrote: On 6/5/07, Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, why does AC_PROG_CPP set CPP= for you? Not sure, but in the Makefile that was generated, it is this: CPP = cc +DD64 -Wl,+k -E How odd! Could you post the entire config.log

Re: version scripts and symbol prefixes

2007-05-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 01:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 29 May 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 19:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 29 May 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On May 29, 2007, at 1:59 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: i just came across libupnp

Re: version scripts and symbol prefixes

2007-05-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 19:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 29 May 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On May 29, 2007, at 1:59 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: i just came across libupnp which uses some libtool functionality to generate a list of exported symbols and pass it to ld so

Re: libtool_osx

2007-05-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 04:40 -0700, seth tyler wrote: Hi! I'm new to the terminal and trying to install jpeg-6b on my ibook running osx.3.9 and I tried the ./configure -enable-shared and got the following. seth-tylers-Computer:~/Desktop/jpeg-6b.1 sethtyler$ ./configure checking host

Re: make check fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.10

2007-05-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
only need to use the daily snapshots (updated today after a while of not updating - sorry). Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: linking got broken on MacOSX

2007-05-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
into this. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: linking got broken on MacOSX

2007-05-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
, but new_inherited_linker_flags has not. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: Libtool fails to build working binary when -no-install is used

2007-04-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
exposed by my last patch. Yes. Sorry, I have not been watching the list as closely as I should be. This looks okay to me, please apply. Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http

Re: Libtool fails to build working binary when -no-install is used

2007-04-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
information from Mac OS X experts. There is no -rpath on Mac OS X 10.4 and earlier, it is, or at least was, I believe, a planned feature for 10.5, but plans and reality don't always intersect... Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___ Bug

Re: libjpeg.la

2007-03-25 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Mar 23, 2007, at 1:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am installing GDAL1.3.2 and 1.4.0 but here I am getting error as follows.. usr/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libjepg.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: '/usr/lib/libjpeg.la' is not a valid libtool

Re: libtool-1.15.23b (i386-unknown-freebsd4.3) check results

2007-02-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Feb 22, 2007, at 8:38 AM, David Fang wrote: Hi again, Here are my results for libtool-1.15.23b on i386-unknown-freebsd4.3 (most PASSes omitted): Hi David, Hmm, all tests pass for me with i386-unknown-freebsd4.8. Please rerun the failing tests with VERBOSE=1 e,g: env VERBOSE=1

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed

2007-02-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
[cutting autoconf-patches list] On Feb 11, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to apply? + +# Cheap backport of AS_EXECUTABLE_P and required macros +# from Autoconf 2.59; we should not use $as_executable_p directly. + +# _AS_TEST_PREPARE +#

Re: tries to link to 32-bit libs on 64-bit build

2007-02-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Feb 6, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Paul Raines wrote: I am trying to build libgnomedb from RPM on a 64-bit box. It dies as follows: /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -m64 -o libgnomedb-2.la -rpath /usr/lib64 -version-info 4:0:0 db-shell.lo sql-viewer.lo

Re: tries to link to 32-bit libs on 64-bit build

2007-02-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Paul Raines wrote: I took a guess and got the RPM to build by putting in a export LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib64 before the configure line in the RPM spec file. That seems to have worked as it got a -L/usr/lib64 into the below. But I still don't understand why

Re: AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER gcc -print-search-dirs problem

2006-10-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:43 AM, Kate Minola wrote: To followup on my previous post on this subject, I propose that in libtool.m4 in the macro AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER the line Hi Kate, I just applied a patch that I believe fixes your issue.

Re: AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER gcc -print-search-dirs problem

2006-09-14 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sep 15, 2006, at 1:08 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Ralf, Okay, I don't think my solution solves anything :/. My gcc compiler in /opt/gcc-4.0.1 only passes -L flags for /opt/gcc-4.0.1/lib/gcc/ powerpc-apple-darwin8.2.0/4.0.1 and /opt/gcc-4.0.1/lib, but -print- search-dirs also includes

Re: AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER gcc -print-search-dirs problem

2006-09-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Kate Minola wrote: On my x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu system, the m4 macro AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER in libtool.m4 uses gcc -print-search-dirs to set sys_lib_search_path_spec. Unfortunately, -print-search-dirs lists

Re: AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER gcc -print-search-dirs problem

2006-09-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:41 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Kate Minola wrote: On my x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu system, the m4 macro AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER in libtool.m4 uses gcc -print-search-dirs to set

Re: AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER gcc -print-search-dirs problem

2006-09-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:49 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Only as a last resort, if you ask me. Other compilers love to disguise as gcc, and Autoconf's AC_FC_LIBRARY_LDFLAGS is witness of how helplessly maintenance-intensive an approach like the above is. That's looking at all kinds of flags, in

Re: AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER gcc -print-search-dirs problem

2006-09-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:12 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:55:11PM CEST: On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:49 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Only as a last resort, if you ask me. Other compilers love to disguise as gcc, and Autoconf's AC_FC_LIBRARY_LDFLAGS

Re: --whole-archive doesn't work on OSX

2006-08-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Aug 3, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Andrew Miller wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Andrew Miller wrote: Hi, I have just posted a bug regarding libtool on OSX to http:// savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?func=detailitemitem_id=105489 I'm not sure if that is the right

Re: 3 failed tests?

2006-07-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:49 AM, Jon Handler wrote: Hello, I ended up getting 3 failed tests, all being the same test, depdemo-inst.test. Im running off of Mac OS X 10.4.7, using the bash shell. Also it gave me this right under your email. make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[1]: ***

Re: libtool 1.5.22 tests failed

2006-07-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 11:50 -0600, Stephen Cartwright wrote: Here you go! Thank you, since the post was too big for the list, I rejected it. Here (for the list) is the failure: cc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\mdemo\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\mdemo\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\0.1\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\mdemo 0.1\

Re: libtool 1.5.22 tests failed

2006-07-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 15:47 -0600, Stephen Cartwright wrote: Hello, I tried to make the latest version of libtool in order to try to get automake to work. However these tests failed when I did a make check. This is on an alpha/Tru65 5.1B box. PASS: mdemo-conf.test FAIL:

Re: libtool uses incorrect module extension (.so instead of .dylib) under Darwin

2006-03-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 21:24 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 21:56 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: and this breaks GTK applications under Mac OS X. This is a bug with the glib2 package, either upstream or darwinports. The correct extension for loadable bundles on darwin

Re: darwin: mix up of .dylib and .bundle

2005-10-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Christoph Egger wrote: Attached. libgii-debug-experimental.output.gz is the whole subdirectory as I sent in my last mail with debug info. libgii-debug-experimental.output2.gz is the failing libtool link line with debug info. Doh! In a directory named ggbundle, file -L

Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?

2005-09-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
, Peter 2005-09-01 Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (old_postintall_cmds): chmod 644 before running ranlib. Reported by Gerald Pfeifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: libltdl/m4/libtool.m4

Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?

2005-08-31 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter O'Gorman wrote: | The problem is that libtool tries to run ranlib after install and that | ranlib can fail if the library is not writable? [crosspost - beware - for context see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-08/msg00937.html] When I look more

Re: [libtool 2.1a] testsuite: 5 15 failed

2005-07-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Oxenreider wrote: |5: inherited_flags.at:20 inherited_linker_flags | 15: stresstest.at:25 Link option thorough search test This patch, applied as obvious, should, I hope, fix the inherited linker flags test. Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman

Re: Handling object name conflicts

2005-05-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:56:03PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: What happens instead with your patch applied (sorry for not checking myself)? Attached is a gnuradio build snippit. Also passes all tests. That looks fine, yes

Re: Handling object name conflicts

2005-05-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Chen-Mou Cheng wrote: Yes it happens with released version as well. Can you confirm that the attached patch to ltmain.sh fixes this issue for you? Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com --- ltmain.sh~ Mon May 16 18:39:29 2005 +++ ltmain.sh Sat May 28 07:38:05 2005

Re: libtool fails without a CXX compiler installed

2005-05-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter O'Gorman wrote: | Eric Sandall wrote: | | Quoting Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | | snip | | | | The problems I have heard about up until now have been that autoconf | | found a C++ compiler, but it was discovered not to work

Re: libtool fails without a CXX compiler installed

2005-05-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Eric Sandall wrote: Quoting Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: snip Replying to myself... it is still fixed. Please use a newer libtool. http://www.opendarwin.org/~pogma/lt_no_cxx.txt I was using 1.5.16, will try 1.5.18, thanks. :) Was also fixed in 1.5.16. If your configure script

Re: [rth@redhat.com: libjava build times]

2005-05-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
they | matter less. | + $ECHO $oldobjs | $SP2NL | $SED -n -e '/./p' _objs Ralf, you really rock! I do worry about this echo though. How big is $oldobjs? Will we exceed the max_cmd_len if echo is an external program? Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

Re: libtool 1.5.14 eats -framework option on Darwin/MacOSX

2005-05-04 Thread Peter O'Gorman
, advice. Use -Wl, or -Xlinker or libtool-1.5.16. Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com Peter, libtool-1.5.16 still has the same bug Well aren't I stupid, I did not notice that you specified *program* and I tried linking a library and it got passed through happily enough. I applied

Re: Small fix for 1.5.16 to turn off installation on default

2005-05-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
topic | | [1] /me waves to pogma I'll wave back, but there is little chance of me having free time enough to do a release until mother-in-law leaves (i.e. mid-May). Anyway, Ralf is better :) Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin