midi2ly not working

2007-09-01 Thread Jonathan Mitchem
I've been unable to get any midis to convert. They have been stored as Midi format 1, as per what I read about midi2ly. The error is... C:\midi2ly 2007-07-05-002-ex.mid1.mid Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\midi2ly.py, line 996, in ? main() File

Re: 2.11.30 segmentation fault

2007-09-01 Thread Trevor Bača
On 8/31/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/8/31, Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Crossposted as Google #433. Running 2.11.30 on a relatively large file (110 measures of six staves with 4559 lines of total input) causes the following segmentation fault. GNU

Regression: trill-spanner-pitched.ly

2007-09-01 Thread Christian Hitz
Hi, I found the following regression in 2.11.31 in trill-spanner- pitched.ly: The parentheses of the indicated pitch collide with the following note. Christian ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Regression: tuplet-properties.ly

2007-09-01 Thread Christian Hitz
Hi, I found a regression in 2.11.31 over 2.10.29 in tuplet-properties.ly: The tuplet number of the second group collides with the stem of the middle note. Christian ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Re: 2.11.30 segmentation fault

2007-09-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007/9/1, Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Joe's looking at the inputfile, which is awesome. For future reference, is there any way to get an unstripped binary (one with all the debug messages not commented out, right?) from the website? Or is git the only way to go? (I've so far avoided

Strange cross-stave beam and slur behaviour with portato

2007-09-01 Thread Neil Puttock
Hello, The portato sign is causing some strange behaviour with both beams and slurs when a voice crosses staves. Unfortunately, I can't seem to replicate the beaming problem in a minimal example, but it seems related to the following snippet where the portato mark causes the slur to be skewed:

Issue 434 in lilypond: unwanted direction change of broken tie

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 434: unwanted direction change of broken tie http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=434 New issue report by lemzwerg: \version 2.11.31 \header { texidoc = A broken tie must never change its direction. Here is a counterexample. } \relative c'' { \time 4/4 bes1 ~ \break

Issue 345 in lilypond: broken tie in chord disappears

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 345: broken tie in chord disappears http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=345 Comment #1 by lemzwerg: This has been fixed somehow. However, it is currently (2.11.31) superseded by #434 and #435 Issue attribute updates: Status: Fixed -- You received this message

Issue 435 in lilypond: degenerated broken ties in chords

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 435: degenerated broken ties in chords http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=435 New issue report by lemzwerg: \version 2.11.31 \header { texidoc = Broken ties between chords must always be visible. Here is a counterexample where the ties degenerate to dots. } \relative

Issue 308 in lilypond: \once fails for Glissando grob properties before a rest

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 308: \once fails for Glissando grob properties before a rest http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=308 Comment #1 by lemzwerg: Doh. This actually works. My example above is flawed -- the \once is placed too early. Issue attribute updates: Status: Invalid -- You

Issue 291 in lilypond: \glissando doesn't work properly with chords

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 291: \glissando doesn't work properly with chords http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=291 Comment #4 by lemzwerg: The idea in comment #3 is probably a bad one... An easy work-around is to use something like this: \relative { \oneVoice \stemDown f2 \glissando \stemNeutral a

Issue 436 in lilypond: keep-inside-line sometimes fails in ragged-right mode

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 436: keep-inside-line sometimes fails in ragged-right mode http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=436 New issue report by lemzwerg: \version 2.11.31 \header { texidoc = In ragged-right mode, the grob with the largest horizontal extent should define the line length. Here is a

Issue 437 in lilypond: alignAboveContext doesn't work as expected

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 437: alignAboveContext doesn't work as expected http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=437 New issue report by lemzwerg: \version 2.11.31 \header { texidoc = `Alias' contexts with the same name should have identical vertical staff offsets. Here is a counterexample. }

Issue 438 in lilypond: subdivideBeams sometimes fails

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 438: subdivideBeams sometimes fails http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=438 New issue report by lemzwerg: \version 2.11.31 \header { texidoc = Setting @code{subdivideBeams} to @code{#f} should work in triplets also. Here is a counterexample. } \relative c' { \set

Re: 2.11.30 segmentation fault

2007-09-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 01 September 2007 09:00, Trevor Bača wrote: On 8/31/07, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 31 August 2007 23:17, Trevor Bača wrote: Should I send the inputfile to either Joe or Han-Wen for testing against .31? I'd be happy to take a look at it. Thank you *so*

Re: 2.11.30 segmentation fault

2007-09-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Joe Neeman escreveu: On Saturday 01 September 2007 09:00, Trevor Bača wrote: On 8/31/07, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 31 August 2007 23:17, Trevor Bača wrote: Should I send the inputfile to either Joe or Han-Wen for testing against .31? I'd be happy to take a look at it.

Re: Strange cross-stave beam and slur behaviour with portato

2007-09-01 Thread Trevor Bača
On 9/1/07, Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, The portato sign is causing some strange behaviour with both beams and slurs when a voice crosses staves. Unfortunately, I can't seem to replicate the beaming problem in a minimal example, but it seems related to the following snippet

Issue 291 in lilypond: \glissando doesn't work properly with chords

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 291: \glissando doesn't work properly with chords http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=291 Comment #5 by trevorbaca: There's a special override to do just this: \override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t Note that all clashing note column warnings will disappear where

Issue 291 in lilypond: \glissando doesn't work properly with chords

2007-09-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 291: \glissando doesn't work properly with chords http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=291 Comment #6 by lemzwerg: Thanks! I wasn't aware of this. Nice. So something like the following should be added to the glissando section in the documentation: I = \once \override