Joe Neeman escreveu: > On Saturday 01 September 2007 09:00, Trevor Bača wrote: >> On 8/31/07, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Friday 31 August 2007 23:17, Trevor Bača wrote: >>>> Should I send the inputfile to either Joe or Han-Wen for testing >>>> against .31? >>> I'd be happy to take a look at it. >> Thank you *so* much, Joe! Will send offlist ... > > I can't reproduce with git or the x86-linux binary. > I get a segfault with the amd64 binary... in ghostscript (during the > convert-to-pdf stage). If I take the .ps file and run it though the system's > ghostscript, it works perfectly. So it seems to be a problem with the > ghostscript that's included in the binary package.
In the original report, it didn't crash in GS but in lily. It looks as if someone needs to build a macos binary without stripping. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
