On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 04:14:25PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> I think the Spanish page is not being generated, so yes, linking to
> English as other languages do is the next bad thing. A Spanish PDF is
> being generated and correctly linked; therefore, please, if any,
> change only the two fir
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:37:52AM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
> Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?
This is fixed in git, but it will only update on the web when I
make a new 2.14.1 release. I would like to do this ri
2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
>> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> >> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
>> >> split+bigpage Changes page. PD
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> >> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
> >> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
> >> Other langu
2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
>> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
>> Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.
>
> Well, if
> http://
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
> Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.
Well, if
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation
2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:55:08PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> > It looks easy to fix this; however, the string is intended to show new
>> > features in current development since latest stable. When 2.15 comes
>> > out, it should be changed to "2.15 since 2.14".
>>
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:55:08PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> > It looks easy to fix this; however, the string is intended to show new
> > features in current development since latest stable. When 2.15 comes
> > out, it should be changed to "2.15 since 2.14".
>
> Patch attached.
Already done
2011/6/7 Francisco Vila :
> 2011/6/7 Xavier Scheuer :
>> On 7 June 2011 09:37, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>>> Congratulations for the release of 2.14!
>>>
>>> CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
>>> Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?
>
> It looks easy to fix thi
2011/6/7 Xavier Scheuer :
> On 7 June 2011 09:37, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>> Congratulations for the release of 2.14!
>>
>> CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
>> Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?
It looks easy to fix this; however, the string is intended t
On 7 June 2011 09:37, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> Congratulations for the release of 2.14!
>
> CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
> Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?
I forgot the link:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/changes/index.html
Cheers,
X
Congratulations for the release of 2.14!
CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://list
12 matches
Mail list logo
