On Aug 26, 2014, at 21:56 , David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
Knute Snortum ksnortum at gmail.com writes:
Adding an n modifier isn't saying that C Sharp is C Natural, it's an
assertion. Yes, I really mean
Dan Eble d...@faithful.be writes:
On Aug 26, 2014, at 21:56 , David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
Knute Snortum ksnortum at gmail.com writes:
Adding an n modifier isn't saying that C Sharp is C Natural, it's an
David Nalesnik david.nalesnik at gmail.com writes:
In the US, I hear people calling c-sharp c often enough. This usage is
certainly not good practice in music theory classes (where I correct it
whenever I can). I can't say anything about informal usage.
The original question here was about
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
David Nalesnik david.nalesnik at gmail.com writes:
In the US, I hear people calling c-sharp c often enough. This usage is
certainly not good practice in music theory classes (where I correct it
whenever I can). I can't say anything about informal
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 00:03 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Btw, bn would also help people who have to switch between german and
dutch/english naming often (e.g. me).
Janek makes a good point, but I'm not sure whether the problem to which
he refers is caused by the existence of different national
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nalesnik at gmail.com writes:
In the US, I hear people calling c-sharp c often enough. This usage
is
certainly not good practice in music theory classes (where I correct it
whenever I can). I
Just my two cent's worth:
Adding an n modifier isn't saying that C Sharp is C Natural, it's an
assertion. Yes, I really mean natural. No, I didn't just forget the
sharp.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:22 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug
Knute Snortum ksnortum at gmail.com writes:
Just my two cent's worth:
Adding an n modifier isn't saying that C Sharp is C Natural, it's an
assertion. Yes, I really mean natural. No, I didn't just forget the
sharp.
That sounds like a benefit, but I would think that people who value
cn for
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
Knute Snortum ksnortum at gmail.com writes:
Just my two cent's worth:
Adding an n modifier isn't saying that C Sharp is C Natural, it's an
assertion. Yes, I really mean natural. No, I didn't just forget the
sharp.
David Winfrey dlw at patriot.net writes:
A new accidental for entering natural notes would be useful.
In English, this would be 'n', as in 'bn4' or 'gn2'.
This is in the bug tracker as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4076
It is easy to add an alternate name for a pitch,
Keith OHara k-ohara5a5a at oco.net writes:
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
But if you enter b4 in F major, you'll get a natural typeset, so there
can
be no confusion. It seems like you're effectively proposing that b4 is a
b
natural I've entered accidentally, but bn4
David Winfrey d...@patriot.net writes:
Keith OHara k-ohara5a5a at oco.net writes:
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
But if you enter b4 in F major, you'll get a natural typeset, so there
can
be no confusion. It seems like you're effectively proposing that b4 is a
b
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:57 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Winfrey d...@patriot.net writes:
Keith OHara k-ohara5a5a at oco.net writes:
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
But if you enter b4 in F major, you'll get a natural typeset, so there
can
be no
As my musical education and practice is from a different note
language, I cannot really say much about the motivation of that
approach. In my country one would never call a cis just c when
talking about music, not even informally (but then nobody wants to
get caught being informal anyway).
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote in message
news:20140823.201350.355342913...@gnu.org...
As my musical education and practice is from a different note
language, I cannot really say much about the motivation of that
approach. In my country one would never call a cis just c when
talking about
2014-08-23 6:57 GMT+02:00 Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net:
As I understand David, Lily need not show any difference.
Accepting the explicit bn helps the user read his own input.
If you learned the note-names as referring generically to scale steps,
with B being the general term, B-natural and
David Winfrey d...@patriot.net wrote in message
news:loom.20140822t182826-...@post.gmane.org...
A new accidental for entering natural notes would be useful.
In English, this would be 'n', as in 'bn4' or 'gn2'.
These would have exactly the same effect as 'b4' or 'g2',
but would be easier to
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
David Winfrey dlw at patriot.net wrote in message
news:loom.20140822T182826-365 at post.gmane.org...
A new accidental for entering natural notes would be useful.
In English, this would be 'n', as in 'bn4' or 'gn2'.
These would have exactly
18 matches
Mail list logo
