Re: bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Dan Eble writes: > Simon Albrecht mail.de> writes: > >> On 18.10.2015 13:25, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: >> > Hi Simon, >> > >> > Thanks for the reply. I am not sure I understand your answer, do you >> > mean that in the tiny example I created I should simply have used a >> >

Re: bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Simon Albrecht mail.de> writes: > On 18.10.2015 13:25, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > Thanks for the reply. I am not sure I understand your answer, do you > > mean that in the tiny example I created I should simply have used a > > "Solo I" indication in the fourth bar instead

Re: bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Hi Gilberto, there’s no point in discussing off-list. On 18.10.2015 17:33, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: > Which it can, and though it may not be up to your preferences, the output is unambiguous, understandable and correct. The output is ambiguous It is inconsistent, that’s true, since R1 is

Re: bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Hi Simon > there’s no point in discussing off-list. My bad, I hit the wrong button. Just for the sake of having the conversation registered in the list, I am copying my previous message to the bottom of this one. >> The output is ambiguous > It is inconsistent Yes, inconsistent is a much

Re: bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Hi Simon, Thanks for the reply. I am not sure I understand your answer, do you mean that in the tiny example I created I should simply have used a "Solo I" indication in the fourth bar instead of using rests? If that's the case, then I disagree with you that would be a better solution than

Re: bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

On 18.10.2015 13:25, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: Hi Simon, Thanks for the reply. I am not sure I understand your answer, do you mean that in the tiny example I created I should simply have used a "Solo I" indication in the fourth bar instead of using rests? No, the solo indication should be

Re: bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Hello Gilberto, sorry for the late answer. If this were a bug, it would be an instance of . But I don’t think there is a point in showing these rests in a partcombined voice. After all, there is a ‘Solo I’ indication showing that the

bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Hello all, I get strange results when I change the type of \partcombine (for instance, using \partcombineApart) when one of the parts is in the middle of a several bars long multi-measure rest: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n182372/39.png code: