Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:59, Michael Witten mfwit...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 17:14, Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org wrote: On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 00:00, Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org wrote: On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' (`-t') rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, unexpected, possibly ruinous behavior). This patch seems correct to me. Is this discussions finished then? Yes, I will make this fix. Are you still planning to commit my patch? Message-ID: 4d76a62e.dd25e30a.5305.4...@mx.google.com http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2011-03/msg0.html Hello? ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 01:58 +, Michael Witten wrote: Hello? I do prefer bugs files in Savannah to things sent on the mailing list, just because they're easier to keep track of. I applied this patch. -- --- Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional. --Mad Scientist ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 05:38, Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org wrote: I do prefer bugs files in Savannah to things sent on the mailing list, just because they're easier to keep track of. Ah. Sorry about that. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
