Re: No follow up on patches to support newer glibc ?

On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:42:51 -0400 Paul Smith wrote: > It does look like we need to make a new release soon. If so, is there anything I can do to get the functionality of my contributed patch in bug #51200 into the upcoming new release? Best regards Henrik

Re: No follow up on patches to support newer glibc ?

On 04/04/18 03:42 PM, Paul Smith wrote: On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 13:03 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: After all the vibrant discussion I was at least expecting a reply that says "okay .. so that works" or perhaps a "ver 4.2.2 patches?" or something. Well, we thought it would work and it did work,

Re: No follow up on patches to support newer glibc ?

On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 13:03 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: > After all the vibrant discussion I was at least expecting a reply that > says "okay .. so that works" or perhaps a "ver 4.2.2 patches?" or > something. Well, we thought it would work and it did work, and those fixes are in the codebase...

Heuristic adaptation of compilation order: desirable? feasible?

I would like to propose a new option to the 'make' command which instructs the software to change the order of execution of same-level rules according to past success or failure, in order to reduce average turn-around times in software development. Consider a target T, which depends on

No follow up on patches to support newer glibc ?

After all the vibrant discussion I was at least expecting a reply that says "okay .. so that works" or perhaps a "ver 4.2.2 patches?" or something. What bothers me is that these patches are only needed on a i686 system thus far. Dennis