X-Mailer: NIMS ModWeb Module
I don't know what this is, but it generates pretty seriously malformed
SMTP messages :-/.
Using the Win32 port of GNU make 3.79.1 on Windows 2000 with either the =
Cygwin shell, or the MKS sh.exe, or even the Windows cmd.exe I get a =
hang when running the
My previous message should have given the URL as:
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.80rc2.tar.gz
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.80rc2.tar.bz2
not alpha.ftp.org. Sums in my previous email are correct. Sorry for
the confusion :(
--
Hi;
After looking at the code I've determined that passing the o is not
sufficiently safe. There are sections of the eval() function which call
variable_expand(), which will reset the variable_buffer setup. So if
you put any of those in your expansion text you'll be sad.
So, I'm going with my
%% Regarding [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: SHELL query/bug]; you wrote:
sb I'm using make v3.78.1 under MS-Windows2k
sb The problem I'm having is that it just doesn't seem to pick up the
sb shell that I've specified in my environment variables.
sb I've tried combinations of SHELL and MAKESHELL
On Monday, 6 November, Eli Zaretskii ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As far as Make is concerned, I think you can say SHELL=mysql -e and
have it your way, no?
No. Make is hardcoded to add the -c option; every command make invokes is run
with $(SHELL) -c cmd.
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:45 -0800, Martin Dorey wrote:
Using heap, which requires a system call to get more memory
(It doesn't affect the main point of Paul's reply but just for academic
interest) no it doesn't:
Even in less contrived applications, brk isn't called anything like as
often
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 03:48 -0800, rocky john wrote:
I am amateur at linux .i am trying to install nagios-2.6.i
went through documentations after executing commands
make install -commandmode
make install -config
I got
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 13:22 +, Jon Grant wrote:
Finally, there is no way to detect an out of stack error and exit gracefully
with a warning as you suggest: the behavior of alloca() is undefined if you
run out of stack space (it doesn't just return NULL as malloc() etc. do).
Is it
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 22:51 +, Jon Grant wrote:
Martin Dorey elucidated on 30/11/06 21:32:
Isn't this more relevant? (Quoting from here on.)
Yeah, Looking at it again I can see that's likely the problem.
I might need to reopen that bug; there definitely was a change in
behavior WRT
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 16:52 -0800, Martin Dorey wrote:
Works for me if I remove the two close-parentheses and replace the white
space with underscores. Open-parenthesis fine, close-parenthesis bad.
Weird. Close-parenthesis is also bad with Debian sarge's make-3.80.
I suspect that has to do
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 13:08 -0800, david baker wrote:
I'm forwarding a note I sent to Karl Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] which he
advised to be sent to you. Additionally I am attaching screen shots of
the actions I took and published on linuxquestions.org and the
Makefile.in from LPRng-3.8.28.
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 13:08 -0800, david baker wrote:
I'm forwarding a note I sent to Karl Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] which he
advised to be sent to you. Additionally I am attaching screen shots of
the actions I took and published on linuxquestions.org and the
Makefile.in from LPRng-3.8.28.
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 00:35 +0100, sofia wrote:
I'm trying to install the packages Net-Pcap0.14 but it's impossible to
do make,it reports:
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libpcap.a(pcap-linux.o): no se puede usar la
reubicación R_X86_64_32 contra `a local symbol' cuando se hace un objeto
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 15:36 +0100, Sombat Ketrat wrote:
the error msg. is
---
GNUmakefile:3: *** Sorry, your version of GNU make (3.81) is too old.
You need one that defines the CURDIR variable. Stop.
---
ifneq (default,$(origin CURDIR))
$(error Sorry, your version of GNU make
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 06:29 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
But this test could be defeated if CURDIR was defined in the
environment, right? If so, the test should make sure CURDIR doesn't
come from the environment.
I was assuming that if it was defined, someone set it. But I guess
you're
I can only assume you're trying to prove a point by making this bug
report virtually unintelligible, with no concrete suggestions for
improvement. Well played. Unfortunately for your point, there's a good
reason for make's behavior.
Pattern rules only match if make can successfully create all
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 23:43 -0500, Shannon Coffey wrote:
I am attempting to compile GCL on a Macintosh.
This list is for bugs with the GNU make program itself. If you're
having problems building some particular software you should find a
mailing list dedicated to that software and ask there
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 22:26 -0500, Ken Takusagawa wrote:
In main.c we have
jobserver_fds-list[0] = xmalloc ((sizeof (1024)*2)+1);
sprintf (jobserver_fds-list[0], %d,%d, job_fds[0], job_fds[1]);
Shouldn't xmalloc get a +2 instead of +1? 1 for the comma, and
one for the null
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 10:32 +, James Coleman wrote:
Ken Takusagawa wrote:
For reasons I haven't completely triaged yet, I've been having my
parallel makes die with
read jobs pipe: Resource temporarily unavailable. Stop.
All memory on machine might be used up (real memory + all
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 01:53 -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
An essential design choice. This stuff relies on reads and writes of the
job_fd being atomic and the writes never blocking. POSIX guarantees a 4K
buffer for pipes. Perhaps the code should check the resource limit and
complain if the -j
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 20:01 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
I'm using GNU make 3.81 (on Linux, if this is important) and see strange
behaviour in parallel builds with the following Makefile:
file1.txt file2.txt: file.in
cat $ file1.txt|tee file2.txt
test: file1.txt file2.txt
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 17:35 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
So if make behaves correctly in the parallel case, does this mean that the
non-parallel case is wrong?
??
No, both are correct.
In the non-parallel case, make examines the first target and its
prerequisites and sees that it needs to
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 22:22 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
In the parallel case, make does exactly the same thing EXCEPT that
instead of waiting for the first command to complete it immediately
checks the second target and, since the first command is not done yet
and hasn't updated it, make
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 13:27 -0800, Bill Harding wrote:
In regards to Paul's earlier questions about the version and
distribution of my make, it is a Cygwin version of make running on
Windows XP. Specifically, if I access my make's help it says Program
built for i686-pc-cygwin. The version of
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 20:15 -0800, suresh babu wrote:
I am interested to do development required for GNU make. Can you give
me the details what should I do?
Hi Suresh.
There are many outstanding issues but nothing jumps out at me at the
moment. I'm currently working on two things: memory
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:00 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
There is a bug tracked in Red Hat bugzilla
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219409
The problem is best demonstrated by this Makefile snippet:
all:;@echo e\
cho
With this make invocation, it works as
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:15 +, Mark Seaborn wrote:
I profiled make. It's spending around 60% of the time in
new_pattern_rule(), which does a linear search through the list of
pattern rules to check for duplicate rules. glibc generates ~2500
rules (in sysd-rules).
Holy moly! How in the
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 07:36 +, Guyeng Gankhuyag wrote:
the build breaks whenever I include the ext2_fs.h header into C file
as simple as following:
This mailing list is for bugs in the GNU make program. Your problem has
nothing to do with GNU make, so it's not appropriate for this mailing
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 12:39 +0100, Depner, Simon wrote:
when im using this command: make -j 7 BUILD_SPEC=PPC32gnu
DEBUG_MODE=1 TRACE=1 clean all the make is not linking, so diden't
get any out-files.
Sorry, but there's not nearly enough information here to allow us to
help you.
Further, this
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 18:41 +0100, Johannes Hölzl wrote:
VPATH := ../dir/
all: a
.SECONDARY:
a: b b
@echo compile
../dir/b:
$ mkdir ../dir
$ touch ../dir/b
$ make -f test.make
make: Circular a - b dependency dropped.
compile
Of course a depends on b, but why depends b on a?
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 20:49 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
There is a de facto standard solution to this problem, which is that a
command line argument of the form @file causes arguments to be read from
file (a response file) if it exists. (If file doesn't exist,
@file is taken literally
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 15:36 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Now done.
Great; thanks!
--
---
Paul D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 16:17 -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Any guesses?
No guesses here. I can't think of any changes in make 3.81, offhand,
that would impact the environment used by the child process.
I think before we can debug this we need you or someone to examine the
cmake failure and try
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 15:57 +0200, Oriol Franquesa Cortés wrote:
Makefile archive runs on version 3.80 but not in 3.1 beta4 version. I
think that is a possible bug.
You should try the released version of GNU make 3.81. It was released
over a year ago so there is no reason to be using a beta
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 14:49 +0100, Jon Grant wrote:
I just ran make check and got 33 failures. I'm running make 3.81, on a
6 month old Ubuntu Linux install.
They are all the same issue, the extra space. Not sure where the extra
space comes from, is anyone else seeing this?
Please be sure
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 23:05 -0400, Marty Leisner wrote:
There's a line
SHELL=/bin/sh
in the makefile...
This is illegal.
Make is not the shell; it does not strip quotes like the shell does.
Quoting is not harmless in make. These two variables:
FOO = A
BAR = A
are very
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 15:22 +0100, Jon Grant wrote:
Could this message below be updated to remind that make update is
needed to download the po files?
That message is generated from the standard gettext build environment,
that is provided by the gettext package. It's not part of the GNU make
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 15:26 +0100, Jon Grant wrote:
A wider query relating to these warnings is that since make 3.81 is
released now, could we change make to use const's instead of #define'd
values, and inline functions instead of #define macro expressions?
No... well, at least not inline.
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 11:21 -0400, Noel Yap wrote:
I'm using the following:
yapn:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/proj/aoeu make --version
GNU Make 3.81beta4
I've seen a number of messages stating that people are using 3.81beta4;
why are people still using a beta version over a year after the final
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 11:17 +0530, chandan wrote:
I am trying to build Microsoft visual c++ programs at the command line
using GNU MAKE. The msdn library says that If you have a project that
you build from the command line with a make file, then the Visual
Studio development environment will
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:16 +0200, Alexander Kahl wrote:
Hi,
I was building glibc today and make (newest cvs version) failed with
make: file.c:147: enter_file: Assertion `*name != '\0'' failed.
make: *** [all] Aborted
Interesting. Of course, the CVS versions of GNU make are not
Is currently unavailable due to a difference of opinion with my ISP as
to whether I've already given them their money or not :-/.
Hopefully this will be resolved shortly and the site will be back up
again.
Sorry for the inconvenience *sigh*.
--
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 11:19 +0800, Agent Zhang wrote:
Or is it indeed intentional by design and the database is not supposed
to be in strictly-valid makefile notation anyway? I'm not sure, so I
think it may be wise to ask here first before firing off a bug report
to Savannah.
It's certainly
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 20:50 +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
When a $(warning) or $(error) is inside a 'define', it is evaluated
even if it is part of a comment.
Others have responded with all the info but I'm not sure everyone
understood it.
There are two factors at work here.
First, note that
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 17:32 +0200, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
I compiled bash 3.2 locally. When I set
SHELL=/home/waterlan/src/bash-3.2/bash -e -o pipefail everything
works as expected. So the problem must be in the ATT sh.
As far as I know, ksh doesn't support pipefail. If so, it's not a
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 12:47 +0200, Dirk Emmermacher wrote:
Is there a make-3.81 file that works with the old HP-UX 10.20?
The GNU project doesn't make binary versions of software available for
download. We provide the source and you build your own binary. You can
obtain the source here:
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 14:28 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
CVS make currently fails to build because make update fails to fetch
the translation files.
Thanks for this note; I had no idea that the site had moved. I'll fix
this.
--
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 11:00 +0530, Anantharamaiah Bhaskara wrote:
make T1 clean T2
I expect
1. pre-requisites of T1 get built and then T1 itself
2. pre-requisities of T1 T2 (common to both) get removed
3. pre-requisites of T2 get built and then T2 itself.
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 14:03 +0800, suyi wrote:
After I uncompress make.3.81.tar on IBM AIX 5.3 ,I run make then
get the error
exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program ./make because of the following errors:
0509-150 Dependent module /usr/local/lib/libintl.a(libintl.so.3)
could not
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:45 -0700, Samuel Klatchko wrote:
Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding how target specific variables
work.
The latter.
See the section in the GNU make manual 'Target-specific Variable Values'
and read the part starting with There is one more special feature of
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 22:31 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How it looks on our GNUmakefile, if sources specified within the limit
around 450, this error occurs otherwise it reports error the parameter
or environment list are too long.
The maximum size of the environment for a new process
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:37 +0530, Jeenu V wrote:
Please see the attached package.
It's difficult for us to unpack and debug larger packages. It's easier
if you provide just a single makefile, and also show the command you
invoked and show the output you received (cut and paste, please)
Please always CC the mailing list.
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 19:13 +0530, Jeenu V wrote:
Your problem is here:
DIRS = $(shell ls)
Thanks for this too. Actually I tried to get the list of directories
with this command:
$(shell for i in $(ls -d */); do echo $i | sed
Krejsa, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, using 'override' also seems to prevent subsequent assignments
to the variable, done within the Makefile without 'override', from
taking effect, as if using 'override' made the variable look as if it
had been defined on the command line. This does
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 11:09 +0200, Frank Schaefer wrote:
The problem is that 'make' seems to start building a target as soon as
the dependency has been started to be built
This is not how make works... or at least not how it should work. If
you can provide a reproducible test case, then that
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 14:53 -0700, Jim Belton wrote:
I've been considering making an enhancement to gmake to support
bmake's '.include file' semantics. In bmake, when you
include a .mk file, its included files are searched for in its
own directory as well as in the path. This
Hi all;
I'm considering switching from CVS to another form of SCM. Currently,
Savannah supports (in addition to CVS) GNU arch and GIT. If SVN were
supported I'd probably go for that, because (a) it has great support for
alternative OSs like Windows, etc.; and (b) GNU make development is
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 20:40 +0800, Zhongxing Xu wrote:
In function library_search(),
libpatterns and buf is malloced memory in line 1486 and 1553
respectively.
They are not freed.
Is this true?
Correct, they are not freed--but no, this is not a memory leak. These
variables are declared
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 21:10 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Can you tell why?
The main reasons are lack of functionality in CVS re renaming, removing,
and reorganizing files. However, it's not a critical issue; I've lived
with it for this long. The other problems CVS has (poor branch/merge,
no
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 18:33 +0100, Jon Grant wrote:
Do they get free'd up when make exits?
No. It's quite difficult to do this since the variables are static and
so are only visible within that function. In order to free them we'd
have to add them to some kind of global free list that could be
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 20:12 +0100, Jon Grant wrote:
the OS should cover that, but in some case I wonder if there may be a
leak left. Would the DOS version for instance result in lost memory the
OS cannot reallocate? (I'm not a DOS expert to answer that)
I would be surprised, since DOS is so
It looks like this discussion may have been premature, perhaps by as
little as a few weeks or so, based on the fact that Savannah has
Subversion support in beta right now and that there seems to be a lot of
action around GIT support on Windows that is being published either now
or very shortly.
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 13:36 -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
IMO the objections to requiring MSYS/Cygwin on Windows made no sense
in this discussion. Make is inherently a POSIX command line tool.
Anybody using it on Windows needs a POSIX environment already anyway.
That is definitely not true. The
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 23:20 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
I'm not asking for conversion of the duration to days, hours, minutes, and
seconds. Just using fixed-point notation instead of exponential notation
is enough: 480 s is understandable.
Thanks Bruno; this seems like a good thing. I'll apply
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 23:20 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
I'm not asking for conversion of the duration to days, hours, minutes,
and seconds. Just using fixed-point notation instead of exponential
notation is enough: 480 s is understandable. Here's a patch to
achieve this
Thanks Bruno; applied.
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 12:17 +0530, Nisha G wrote:
When compiling with make I'm getting an error as below.
This is a bug in your code, not a bug in GNU make. We can't help you
solve bugs in your code: this mailing list is for bugs in the GNU make
program itself.
Good luck!
--
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 17:07 -0800, Anand, CJ wrote:
make OS=nto CPULIST=x86 -B install LDFLAGS=-M
You have to quote the argument so make treats the entire CPULIST as one
argument:
make OS=nto CPULIST='x86 -B install' LDFLAGS=-M
This is really more of a shell syntax question than a make
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 01:32 +0100, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:
/* Handle other OSs. */
#ifndef PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR
# if defined(HAVE_DOS_PATHS)
# define PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR ';'
# define IS_PATHSEP(c) ((c) == '/' || (c) == '\\')
# define HAVE_DRIVE(n) ((n)[0] (n)[1] == ':')
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 09:24 -0700, Gert Jan van Loo wrote:
I assume this 'feature' will not be removed as it will break the
makefile of all simple souls who are not competent enough to add a
space in the right place.
Actually, it won't be removed because to do so would contravene the
POSIX
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:17 +0530, vasanthan wrote:
where could i found the same version of GNU make
can any1 send me the link
Source code for GNU make can be found here:
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make
--
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 17:11 +0200, Arthur Carlson wrote:
$ make SWITCH=on a
makefile:10: *** missing `endif'. Stop.
This is a bug in GNU make 3.80. You should upgrade to 3.81.
I can only assume that the reason it works on one system and not the
other, is that the working version was patched
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 01:09 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Trying to compile ltp (ltp.sf.net) with modified makefiles and
whenever I run make as follows, it segfaults:
---
shiina:ltp-full-20080430 gcooper$ make -Np
Segmentation fault
Hm. I can't reproduce this; it doesn't
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:02 +, willard mapurisa wrote:
I get the following compilation error when I try to compile a nurbs++
package with openGL support .
Hi Willard;
This mailing list is for people having problems with the program GNU
make. Your error here is not related to make, it's
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:22 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Trying out a recursive include, I seem to have run into a resource
issue:
make[2]: Entering directory `/scratch/ltp-full-20080430/tools/apicmds
../Makefile.inc:4: ../Makefile.inc: Too many open files
make[2]: *** No rule to make
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 19:14 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
A, Sravanthi wrote on 23 May 2008 12:14:
Hi team,
Iam trying to build my application using make on Linux server. But my
build doesn't stop after first error. I tried -S options but doesn't
seems to help.
The top-level makefile
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 19:49 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All is well:
$ cat Makefile
all:z.bak
%.bak:;
$ make
make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
Until we add a %:
$ cat Makefile
all:z.bak
%.bak:%;
$ make
make: *** No rule to make target `z.bak', needed by `all'.
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:28 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, OK, is perhaps this message,
make: *** No rule to make target `z', needed by `a'. Stop.
is actually triggered by several different conditions, and could
instead be refashioned into several more exact messages, e.g., no
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 12:02 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe whatever prints messages prefixed by
make: *** No rule to make target
is called from several different points in the code, and could give
finer grained messages, all still on one line.
Maybe there is a difference between
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 01:49 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do differentiate error messages from different triggers,
I'm not sure this is fruitful, but to reiterate: there are no different
triggers. There is one procedure. It looks something like this (100%
psuedo code):
rule *r;
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 16:00 +0530, A, Sravanthi wrote:
3. b.o is dependant on a.o
If any changes are done to a.cc file, b.o should get rebuilt.
This is an extremely unusual situation. In what way is b.o depending on
a.cc or a.o? Generally, .o files depend on the single .c or .cc or
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 23:50 +0400, Ilya N. Golubev wrote:
This may seem justified, and is at least understandable. And
complying with all of this takes in most cases even more work than
isolating (and even possibly fixing) the bug entirely on one's own.
So the posting becomes pointless.
Yes.
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 09:06 +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
I sent a message to this mailing list some months ago but I still
didn't get an answer. Doesn't GNU Make want to consider files
checksum in addition to mtime?
There was a Google SOC project for GNU make which added user-definable
out
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 15:39 +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
suppose that you have some include-statement in the makefile like
this:
include foo.d
and make knows how to generate foo.d.
Then you get a message that foo.d is missing _and_ after that make
generates foo.d.
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:39 -0600, Chang-Yeol Jung wrote:
When running make, in the computer screen, a long list of warning
messages are displaying. I'd like to see only the compile errors.
Is there an option for this? Or, is there a way that I can see only
the errors so that I can debug
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 22:42 +0200, Daniela Rütting wrote:
1st problem: In an attempt to reduce tedious typing when defining a variable
from the command line, I tried:
ifeq (max,$(O))
O = -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-unroll-loops
endif
ifeq (,$(O))
O = -O
endif
CXXFLAGS = -W -Wall $(O)
Hi all;
While working on some changes to 2nd expansion etc. to try to reduce
total heap usage in GNU make, I've discovered that there is a bug in the
current makefile parsing. My new version doesn't have this bug (or,
more precisely, it contains the opposite bug) and I've noticed at least
two
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 23:15 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Can you give me a more precise pointer where we have this issue
so I can get it fixed. I guess it is Makefile.build...
If you mean in the Linux kernel there are two places:
Makefile:1601: *** mixed implicit and normal rules.
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 15:32 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
Just to be clear, the problem with mixing a pattern with a normal
target is what happens when there's a pattern prerequisite, right? I
mean, the example you gave at least has a sensical _possible_
interpretation, but this:
foo %.c:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 11:49 -0600, Afowowe,Emmanuel O wrote:
Have you seen errors similar to the one below during the compile of
AFNI for Solaris 10?
# make 'CC=gcc' totality
gcc -c thd_loaddblk.c -I. -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/openwin/include
-I/usr/openwin/share/include/X11
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 18:53 +, David Wuertele wrote:
I posted this to the developer list but got no response. Looks like there's
been no activity on that list since October. Is it dead? Anyway, here's the
bug report:
Which list do you mean by the developer list? It's helpful if you
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 16:34 +0530, jaskirat singh wrote:
i have been installing GNU radio on fedora. after giving
the ./bootstrap and ./configure command in gnuradio-core,it works fine
but as i move to make it shows the following error.
Your problem is with installing GNU Radio; this
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:27 -0800, willard wrote:
I am new to this message board... I did not intend to yell...
Thanks for the info... I hope the Gnu Make developers are listening to
bug-m...@gnu.org.
I had a quick look at the CVS tree bug tracking (on sourceforge.net), and I
didn't see
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 05:04 -0800, Yakup Akbay wrote:
in chapter ‘2.7 Rules for Cleaning the Directory’ in ‘GNU make’
document.
.PHONY : clean
clean :
-rm edit $(objects)
The minus sign before ‘rm’ seems to be a clerical error.
Why do you say so? That's
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 10:24 -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
Those are just the sort of items I would consider if this was my
project; Paul and the other developers may have completely different
criteria in mind, but I would be surprised if they didn't overlap
some.
I think all of Philip's
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 13:23 +0100, Antoine Petitet wrote:
Hi Folks,
I sent this message to help mailing alias. I should have sent it
maybe to this alias, eventhough, it is not obvious to me at this
point that the issue is in GNU make.
This is not good at all. This means that somehow make
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 09:52 +0200, bestellrep1 wrote:
Please keep my email-address confidential, as I don't want to get spam.
Sorry, but this is a mailing list. Anyone can subscribe. Plus it's
archived in numerous places, all of which are publicly available and
searchable.
The command (1)
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 23:59 -0500, Hamed Janzadeh wrote:
Last night I found a very cruel bug in GNU make that led to a costly
experience for me. Hence, I decided to report it and to help others
not to repeat my experiment.
In a Makefile, and in assignment operations, the space character
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 03:03 +1000, Anthony Shipman wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009 11:26:14 am Philip Guenther wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Anthony Shipman a...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I've tried the example in section 3.8 Overriding Part of Another
Makefile. i.e.
foo:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 16:07 -0400, Aleksey Yakovlev wrote:
Please take a look at my posting #4:
http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.utils.bug/browse_thread/thread/e23e2352bf6f8a91?hl=en#
It would work out better to use this list. Here's the message I guess
you mean:
It looks like the make
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 00:46 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
//%: //%
@echo oops!
When I run this with GNU make 3.80, I get this error:
make: Circular /tmp/x1.mk - /tmp/x1.mk dependency dropped.
Is that what you mean by normal?
I do agree that something is broken
1 - 100 of 1345 matches
Mail list logo
