On Sunday 06 of December 2015 22:28:54 Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> 1 - 4 applied (with slight modifications - 0a93c16c & 239441b5).
>
> As to 5, I have serious doubts. Of course hinting about the ? key
> is a nice idea. However, the "Prepare volume" prompt is in its
> present form
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> 1 - 4 applied (with slight modifications - 0a93c16c & 239441b5).
>
> As to 5, I have serious doubts. Of course hinting about the ? key
> is a nice idea. However, the "Prepare volume" prompt is in its
> present form for long enough time, so that some othe
Hi Pavel,
1 - 4 applied (with slight modifications - 0a93c16c & 239441b5).
As to 5, I have serious doubts. Of course hinting about the ? key
is a nice idea. However, the "Prepare volume" prompt is in its
present form for long enough time, so that some other software
might rely on its wording.
Hi Pavel,
> Ping?
Thanks for reminding me.
Regards,
Sergey
Ping?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2012-11/msg8.html
On Friday 02 of November 2012 14:45:40 Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could you please consider following series of patches:
>
> [PATCH 1/5] Make the multi-volume code more generic
> - low prio -> just avoid code duplicatio
On Friday, November 02, 2012 02:45:40 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could you please consider following series of patches:
>
> [PATCH 1/5] Make the multi-volume code more generic
> - low prio -> just avoid code duplication
>
> [PATCH 2/5] New test for extraction of multi-volume archives
>
Hello,
could you please consider following series of patches:
[PATCH 1/5] Make the multi-volume code more generic
- low prio -> just avoid code duplication
[PATCH 2/5] New test for extraction of multi-volume archives
- prepare test for the following commit
[PATCH 3/5] Fix for extracting multi-v
