On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 03:18:06PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > It would seem like a simple change to treat @w the same as @shortcaption
> > and @math here.
>
> It is probably the converse that would be best, that is add
> contain_simple_text to shortcaption and math... Actually,
> it would
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:53:12PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 04:42:45PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > It could also be possible to accept more commands in @w without giving a
> > warning.
>
> Given that @footnote and @verb don't work properly inside @w and the
> using
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 04:42:45PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> It could also be possible to accept more commands in @w without giving a
> warning.
Given that @footnote and @verb don't work properly inside @w and the
using @pxref inside @w isn't something that document authors particularly
want
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:36:42 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said:
Eli> I was surprised to hear that @w is used around a cross-reference. I
Eli> admit I still don't understand the need: AFAIK all the viewers for all
Eli> the output formats can cope with a reference that is broken between
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:42:18 +0200, Patrice Dumas said:
>> I guess we could use @w for "The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual"
>> there (but I never read emacs docs in html, so Iʼm the wrong person to
>> offer an opinion).
Patrice> I think that it would avoid more unwanted break
