https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #12 from Konstantin J. Chernov ---
Yann, thank you very much for the detailed explanation and for the patch.
First of all, I finally reproduced the issue, and you were right that it was
caused by a per-request content filter.
And
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #11 from Yann Ylavic ---
I meant the first request in "ho1.txt", not the one from your "openssl
s_client".
This first request in "ho1.txt" is sent with both the header and body at the
same time (and by the way has no "Expect:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #4 from nv5...@att.com ---
In the end, the following worked:
./configure \
--prefix=/sites/www-site/att/httpd-2.4.41 \
--enable-modules="all" \
--enable-mods-shared="all" \
--enable-authn-file \
--enable-authn-dbm \
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #3 from nv5...@att.com ---
below we can see the location of the ldap library and the required "ldap_init"
definition:
[build@ecombuild03 httpd-2.4.41]$ ls -l /sites/utils/lib/libldap.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 build build 37 Oct 15 14:11
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #10 from Konstantin J. Chernov ---
Thanks, I'll try to recompile/install on test env tomorrow (and hopefully get
it into prod a week later) to see if anything changes.
I'll also try to reproduce this issue several times during the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #9 from Yann Ylavic ---
Created attachment 36838
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36838=edit
Send 100-continue (if needed) when spooling the request body
OK, mod_proxy blocks on spooling the request body
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin J. Chernov ---
No, that env var was not set (all setenv's used are in the first comment).
Isn't it supposed to be suppressing the 100-continue in response to the client?
In this case, the Apache is not making
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #7 from Yann Ylavic ---
Possibly you had some "SetEnv proxy-interim-response" policy configured on the
original attempt but not on the following ones?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #6 from Konstantin J. Chernov ---
Created attachment 36837
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36837=edit
Fourth attempt (same settings as in ho1.txt, with ping parameter on BM) --
issue is not reproducing
Also
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin J. Chernov ---
Some magic is definitely happening here.
I was unable to reproduce this issue 12 hours after report. No changes were
made to tomcat or apache during this time.
I've added two attachments: ho1.txt
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin J. Chernov ---
Created attachment 36836
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36836=edit
Third attempt (same log settings as in ho1.txt) - issue is not reproducing
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin J. Chernov ---
Created attachment 36835
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36835=edit
Second attempt (full trace7), issue is not reproducing
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin J. Chernov ---
Created attachment 36834
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36834=edit
Original attempt, where the issue is shown
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63855
--- Comment #1 from Yann Ylavic ---
Could you please provide the error_log of the transaction with LogLevel trace7?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63628
--- Comment #2 from Martin Drößler ---
We're still blocked with our migration-project, due to this feature being
missing.
Any idea on when we can expect a response?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Pluem ---
--with-ldap does not have a path set unlike your other --with-something
options
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
16 matches
Mail list logo
