On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:01:30PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
> On 2021-12-09 6:46 p.m., Ted Bullock wrote:
> > On 2021-12-06 4:21 p.m., Ted Bullock wrote:
> > I think that there is an bug triggered by endian code here:
> >
> >> radeondrm0: RV100
> >> BIOS signature incorrect 0 0
> >
> > in
On 2021-12-09 6:46 p.m., Ted Bullock wrote:
> On 2021-12-06 4:21 p.m., Ted Bullock wrote:
> I think that there is an bug triggered by endian code here:
>
>> radeondrm0: RV100
>> BIOS signature incorrect 0 0
>
> in sys/dev/pci/drm/radeon/radeon_bios.c:840
>
> if (rdev->bios[0] != 0x55 ||
On 2021-12-06 4:21 p.m., Ted Bullock wrote:
> Ok, so this time I plugged in a discrete GPU into this ultrasparc
> system, the sun XVR-100 which is a PCI card with vga and dvi ports. The
> card uses an ati radeon r100 generation video chip.
I think that there is an bug triggered by endian code
Hi,
I would like to follow up on submitted patch, is there any concern on
applying it for vte(4) driver (as well as adding new PHY models to
rdcphy(4): https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs=163105121012387=2 to
rdcphy)? It would be helpful for me to avoid patching it manually.
Thank you.
Regards,