I just commited this diff:
diff --git engine.c engine.c
index 147ba75d66f..986ee0a250e 100644
--- engine.c
+++ engine.c
@@ -1554,6 +1554,11 @@ void update_iface_ra(struct slaacd_iface *iface, struct
radv *ra)
gen_dfr_proposal(iface, ra);
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 11:13:30PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 06:04:30PM +0000, Florian Obser wrote:
> > > It'd be nice if somebody could tell us what the RFCs say about this
> > > case. Florian do you have an idea? Should we fix something or shoul
Hi Matthias,
can you please send a pcap to me in private (no need to bother the
mailing list with it). If at all possible with a few solicitations &
advertisements in there.
The output of
slaacctl sh in
could also be interesting...
Thanks,
Florian
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:44:31PM +0200,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 26/06/17(Mon) 12:39, Marc Peters wrote:
> > Am 06/26/17 um 10:58 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
> > > [...]
> > > Could you set net.inet6.icmp6.nd6_debug to 1 and redo this?
> > >
> > > Do you see anything in the log?
> >
> >
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:18:25PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> when using a server.key with a passphrase, ie
>
> openssl genrsa -aes256 -out /etc/ssl/private/server.key 2048
>
> server "default" {
> listen on * port 80
> listen on * tls port 443
> directory { auto index }
> }
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 06:37:55PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:05:37AM +0200, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > httpd crashes with a segmentation violation when servicing requests with
> > the following (minimal) config file:
> >
> > server "default" {
> >
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 05:49:12AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 06:29:32PM +0000, Florian Obser wrote:
> >
> > ... it just sits here forever.
> >
> > Using hostserver's archive I bisected miniroots and found that
> > this one works:
>
... it just sits here forever.
Using hostserver's archive I bisected miniroots and found that
this one works:
https://ftp.hostserver.de/archive/2017-03-07-0105/snapshots/armv7/miniroot-panda-61.fs
OpenBSD 6.1-beta (RAMDISK) #52: Sun Mar 5 15:11:37 MST 2017
U-Boot SPL 2016.11
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:43:03PM +0100, Gabriel Nieto wrote:
> if you are doing ping to one host and some one else use the
> traceroute command, then traceroute command no timeout all the hops.
indeed, the problem is that poll(2) returns because it sees a packet that
is not for us. and
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.0
Details : OpenBSD 6.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Tue Oct 18 19:53:17
MDT 2016
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Architecture: OpenBSD.amd64
Machine : amd64
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 07:34:32PM +0200, thoma...@twelveletter.com wrote:
> >Synopsis:Man page for hostname.if contains outdated IPv6 autoconf
> >information
> >Category:documentation
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.0
> Details : OpenBSD 6.0 (GENERIC.MP) #3: Wed
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:50:48AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> rkito...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >Synopsis: rm -rf "" # prints error message but should be silent
> > >Category: system
> > >Environment:
> > System : OpenBSD 5.9
> > Details : OpenBSD 5.9 (GENERIC.MP) #1888: Fri Feb 26
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:26:00PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 14/06/16(Tue) 15:18, Florian Obser wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm seeing this panic on my v6 gateway running in a vm (don't ask):
> > It has a v6 tunnel via HE on gif0.
> >
> > I hope I copied all
Hi,
I'm seeing this panic on my v6 gateway running in a vm (don't ask):
It has a v6 tunnel via HE on gif0.
I hope I copied all relevant information, if not, my appologies, I'm
in a hurry currently, please just ask for more.
I will probably investigate more when I'm home :)
panic: trap type 6,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:31:28PM -0700, Shohrukh Shoyoqubov wrote:
> >Synopsis: pflow(4) is not sending packets when initialized through
> hostname.if(5) and flowsrc is on trunk(4)
> >Category: system i386
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 5.8
> Details : OpenBSD 5.8 (GENERIC.MP)
(Cc: semarie@ added)
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:04:30PM -0400, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
If you have a CGI script that produces multiple headers in separate writes,
then they may be delivered to httpd as separate FastCGI records, depending on
a race between the CGI script writing more
this version is better
Index: httpd.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/httpd.h,v
retrieving revision 1.92
diff -u -p -r1.92 httpd.h
--- httpd.h 19 Jul 2015 05:17:27 - 1.92
+++ httpd.h 25 Jul 2015 22:40:39 -
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:15:09PM -0500, Matthew Martin wrote:
Synopsis:Serving large files with httpd eats fscktons of memory.
Category:system
Environment:
System : OpenBSD 5.7
Details : OpenBSD 5.7 (GENERIC) #0: Thu Apr 30 22:01:01 CEST 2015
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:05:46PM +, Florian Obser wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:15:09PM -0500, Matthew Martin wrote:
Synopsis: Serving large files with httpd eats fscktons of memory.
Category: system
Environment:
System : OpenBSD 5.7
Details : OpenBSD 5.7
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:04:53PM +0200, Alexander Lobodzinski wrote:
Synopsis: wrong max value for rltime in rtadv.conf(5)
Category: documentation
Environment:
System : OpenBSD 5.6
Details : all
Architecture: all
Machine : all
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 03:56:25PM +, Nishal Ranchhod wrote:
Synopsis:OpenBSD 5.4 Stable kernel fails to compile
Category:
Environment:
System : OpenBSD 5.3
[...]
While preparing to upgrade to OpenBSD-5.4-stable the kernel fails to
compile.
You are not supposed to do
I just noticed the patch is not correct as it might compare random
garbage at least in the AF_INET case. I'll send a new patch soon.
Sorry for the noise,
Florian
On 07/03/2012 01:09 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
I think this should go in. oks?
dammit, I turned this into the fix from hell :/
The patch tries to do the right thing when nh-true_nexthop.aid !=
nh-nexthop_net.aid I'm pretty sure this should never be the case for
AID_INET and AID_INET6 but no idea what AID_VPN_IPv4 does.
If nh-true_nexthop.aid != nh-nexthop_net.aid is
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 06:08:29PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Florian Obser flor...@narrans.de [2012-07-03 17:07]:
dammit, I turned this into the fix from hell :/
The patch tries to do the right thing when nh-true_nexthop.aid !=
nh-nexthop_net.aid I'm pretty sure this should never
Hi,
after a very brief reading of ospfd sources I think I understand
why it touches the route on the external interface. (This might be
entirely wrong, but I think it does its spf dance and then puts the
best routes into the fib wether they changed or not.)
In any case since I understand ospfd a
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo