Re: ipv6 problem on 6.1-beta

2017-03-25 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:29:28PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > Could you tell me if the diff below solve the issue? Yes it solves it. The router entry isn't marked as expired on timeout, but renewed, and inet6 connectivity still works after 1 day of inactivity. 05:36:46.725925 2001:41d0:f

Re: miniroot-panda-61.fs doesn't boot since March 8

2017-03-25 Thread Florian Obser
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 05:49:12AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 06:29:32PM +, Florian Obser wrote: > > > > ... it just sits here forever. > > > > Using hostserver's archive I bisected miniroots and found that > > this one works: > > > > https://ftp.hostserver.de/

Re: miniroot-panda-61.fs doesn't boot since March 8

2017-03-25 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 18:29:32 + > From: Florian Obser So what changed was the U-Boot version: > U-Boot SPL 2016.11 (Dec 24 2016 - 09:08:50) > OMAP4460-GP ES1.1 > Trying to boot from MMC1 > SPL: Please implement spl_start_uboot() for your board > SPL: Direct Linux boot not active! > readi

Re: miniroot-panda-61.fs doesn't boot since March 8

2017-03-25 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 06:29:32PM +, Florian Obser wrote: > > ... it just sits here forever. > > Using hostserver's archive I bisected miniroots and found that > this one works: > > https://ftp.hostserver.de/archive/2017-03-07-0105/snapshots/armv7/miniroot-panda-61.fs > OpenBSD

miniroot-panda-61.fs doesn't boot since March 8

2017-03-25 Thread Florian Obser
... it just sits here forever. Using hostserver's archive I bisected miniroots and found that this one works: https://ftp.hostserver.de/archive/2017-03-07-0105/snapshots/armv7/miniroot-panda-61.fs OpenBSD 6.1-beta (RAMDISK) #52: Sun Mar 5 15:11:37 MST 2017 U-Boot SPL 2016.11 (D

Re: RTM_NEWADDR with zeroed prefixlen

2017-03-25 Thread kwesterback
> On Mar 25, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 10:40:12AM -0600, Philip Guenther wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Claudio Jeker wrote: >> ... I've made a diff that fixes this problem for me. I just moved the mask calculation to somewhere before rt_ifa_

Re: RTM_NEWADDR with zeroed prefixlen

2017-03-25 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 10:40:12AM -0600, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Claudio Jeker wrote: > ... > > > I've made a diff that fixes this problem for me. I just moved the mask > > > calculation to somewhere before rt_ifa_addlocal(), which is the function > > > responsible for callin

Re: RTM_NEWADDR with zeroed prefixlen

2017-03-25 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Claudio Jeker wrote: ... > > I've made a diff that fixes this problem for me. I just moved the mask > > calculation to somewhere before rt_ifa_addlocal(), which is the function > > responsible for calling the RTM_NEWADDR message. > > IMO we should kill classless routes and jus

Re: RTM_NEWADDR with zeroed prefixlen

2017-03-25 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:14:50PM +0100, Rafael Zalamena wrote: > I found a problem in the routing socket interface address install message. > This issue only happens when installing IPv4 addresses on interfaces > without specifying a prefix. > > e.g. ifconfig vether0 1.1.1.1 > > The command abo