Sorry if removing the jprt.config file caused you any grief.
David is right as to what they are used for.
Managing all the repository copies of jprt.config for all the
different jdk releases was becoming a pain, so I moved all these
files into the jprt system itself, their contents were very speci
I'll try and get the example fixed.
-- Jon
On May 21, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/5/21 Jonathan Gibbons :
Andrew,
Yes, Contributed-by: just takes a simple email address. It'll be
munged (@
-> " at ") automatically on web pages.
-- Jon
Ugh, should have thought
2009/5/21 Jonathan Gibbons :
> Andrew,
>
> Yes, Contributed-by: just takes a simple email address. It'll be munged (@
> -> " at ") automatically on web pages.
>
> -- Jon
>
Ugh, should have thought of that. It's confusing having an example
that doesn't work as given :(
>
> On May 21, 2009, at 8
Andrew,
Yes, Contributed-by: just takes a simple email address. It'll be
munged (@ -> " at ") automatiocally on web pages.
-- Jon
On May 21, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/5/21 Mark Reinhold :
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:17:21 +0100
From: Andrew John Hughes
Ok, new
2009/5/21 Mark Reinhold :
>> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:17:21 +0100
>> From: Andrew John Hughes
>
>> Ok, new webrev created against jdk7/build:
>>
>> http://fuseyism.com/6841728/webrev.01/
>
> Looks good to me -- go ahead and push when ready.
>
Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev
Changeset: c06d30bd8c69
Author:andrew
Date: 2009-05-21 16:29 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/c06d30bd8c69
6841728: Make building the Nimbus L 'n' F optional (100054)
Summary: Add DISABLE_NIMBUS variable to prevent Nimbus subdirs being built
Reviewed-by: mr,
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:17:21 +0100
> From: Andrew John Hughes
> Ok, new webrev created against jdk7/build:
>
> http://fuseyism.com/6841728/webrev.01/
Looks good to me -- go ahead and push when ready.
> I presume I need to wait a bit due to the current block on pushes though.
No, the grou
In article <[email protected]>,
David Holmes - Sun Microsystems
wrote:
> Sorry that flag should be LP64=1
Thanks for the suggestions - it seems the patch to jprt.config isn't
necessary any more. (I had somehow lost the corba patch and the way the
build was failing was confusing me.)
